In the CQRS pattern, what is the primary reason for separating commands and queries into different models?
Think about how separating responsibilities can help improve system efficiency.
CQRS separates commands (writes) and queries (reads) so each can be optimized independently, improving performance and scalability.
Which component in a CQRS architecture is responsible for handling commands and updating the write database?
Commands change data, so which component processes these changes?
The Command Handler processes commands and updates the write database or triggers events.
In a high-traffic system using CQRS, which scaling strategy best improves read performance without affecting write throughput?
Think about how to handle many read requests efficiently without slowing down writes.
Scaling out the read model with replicas and caching improves read performance independently, keeping writes unaffected.
What is a common tradeoff when using eventual consistency between the write and read models in CQRS?
Consider what happens when updates take time to appear in the read model.
Eventual consistency means the read model updates asynchronously, so reads might show old data briefly.
A CQRS system handles 10,000 write commands per minute and 96,000 read queries per minute. If each read query requires 5ms processing time on average, how many read replicas are needed to handle the load with 80% CPU utilization per replica?
Calculate total processing time per minute and divide by capacity per replica.
Total read processing time per minute = 96,000 * 5 ms = 480,000 ms = 480 seconds. Each replica can process 60 * 0.8 = 48 seconds of CPU time per minute. Number of replicas = 480 / 48 = 10.