Consider a distributed system where components communicate asynchronously. What is the main advantage of using event-driven design in such a system?
Think about how components communicate and depend on each other in event-driven systems.
Event-driven design enables components to work independently by reacting to events asynchronously, reducing tight coupling and improving scalability.
In an event-driven architecture, what component helps to decouple the event producers from the event consumers?
Think about how events are passed without direct connection between components.
An event broker or message queue acts as an intermediary that stores and forwards events, allowing producers and consumers to operate independently.
Compare event-driven design with synchronous request-response design. How does event-driven design help improve scalability?
Think about how asynchronous processing affects resource usage and throughput.
Event-driven design allows components to handle events independently and in parallel, reducing wait times and improving throughput, which enhances scalability.
Event-driven systems often sacrifice something to gain scalability and decoupling. What is a common tradeoff related to data consistency?
Consider how asynchronous event processing affects the timing of data updates.
Event-driven systems often use eventual consistency, meaning data updates propagate over time rather than instantly, trading immediate consistency for scalability.
A system uses one event broker with 10 partitions. Each partition can handle 1000 events per second. What is the maximum total event throughput the system can handle?
Multiply the number of partitions by the throughput per partition.
The total throughput is the sum of throughput of all partitions: 10 partitions * 1000 events/sec = 10,000 events/sec.