Bird
Raised Fist0
LLDsystem_design~10 mins

Code review checklist for LLD - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available

Start learning this pattern below

Jump into concepts and practice - no test required

or
Recommended
Test this pattern10 questions across easy, medium, and hard to know if this pattern is strong
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to check if the design follows the {{BLANK_1}} principle.

LLD
if design.adheres_to("[1]"):
    print("Design is modular and easy to maintain.")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ASingle Responsibility
BOpen-Closed
CLiskov Substitution
DDependency Inversion
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Confusing Single Responsibility with Open-Closed principle.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to validate if the design uses {{BLANK_1}} to reduce tight coupling.

LLD
if design.uses("[1]"):
    print("Design is loosely coupled.")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Ainheritance
Bhardcoded dependencies
Cglobal variables
Dinterfaces
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing inheritance which can increase coupling.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the checklist code to ensure {{BLANK_1}} is properly checked.

LLD
if not design.has_clear_[1]():
    raise ValueError("Design lacks clarity in this aspect.")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Anaming
Bcomments
Cinterfaces
Ddependencies
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Checking interfaces instead of naming clarity.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to verify design {{BLANK_1}} and {{BLANK_2}}.

LLD
if design.has_[1]() and design.is_[2]():
    print("Design is scalable and maintainable.")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Amodularity
Bperformance
Cextensible
Dtestable
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Choosing performance or testable which are important but not the focus here.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to check design {{BLANK_1}}, {{BLANK_2}}, and {{BLANK_3}}.

LLD
if design.is_[1]() and design.has_[2]() and design.supports_[3]():
    print("Design meets quality standards.")
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Atestable
Bdocumentation
Cscalability
Dsecurity
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Confusing security with scalability or testability.

Practice

(1/5)
1. Which of the following is the MOST important focus when reviewing a Low-Level Design (LLD) document?
easy
A. Clarity and correctness of the design
B. The color scheme of the document
C. The number of pages in the document
D. The font style used

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the purpose of LLD review

    The main goal is to ensure the design is clear and correct so developers can implement it properly.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate options based on relevance

    Options A, B, and D relate to formatting, which is less critical than clarity and correctness.
  3. Final Answer:

    Clarity and correctness of the design -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Focus on clarity and correctness = C [OK]
Hint: Focus on design clarity and correctness first [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Focusing on document style over content
  • Ignoring correctness for aesthetics
  • Confusing LLD with high-level design
2. Which checklist item should be included to ensure modularity in an LLD review?
easy
A. Ensure the document has a table of contents
B. Check if the design uses consistent variable names
C. Count the total number of classes
D. Verify if components have clear, single responsibilities

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand modularity in design

    Modularity means breaking the system into parts that each do one thing well.
  2. Step 2: Match options to modularity

    Verify if components have clear, single responsibilities directly relates to single responsibility, a key modularity principle. Others are unrelated.
  3. Final Answer:

    Verify if components have clear, single responsibilities -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Modularity = single responsibility components [OK]
Hint: Look for single responsibility to ensure modularity [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing naming consistency with modularity
  • Counting classes without checking responsibilities
  • Focusing on document formatting
3. Given this checklist item: "Ensure all public methods have clear input and output definitions." What is the MOST likely outcome if this is NOT followed?
medium
A. Developers may implement methods incorrectly due to unclear contracts.
B. The system will automatically generate method documentation.
C. The code will run faster.
D. The design will have fewer classes.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the role of input/output definitions

    Clear definitions guide developers on how to use methods correctly.
  2. Step 2: Analyze consequences of missing definitions

    Without clear contracts, developers may misunderstand method usage, causing errors.
  3. Final Answer:

    Developers may implement methods incorrectly due to unclear contracts. -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Unclear method contracts = incorrect implementation [OK]
Hint: Clear method contracts prevent implementation errors [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming code runs faster without definitions
  • Thinking documentation is auto-generated
  • Confusing method count with clarity
4. You find a design where security considerations are missing in the LLD. What is the BEST immediate action during the code review?
medium
A. Approve the design since security is handled later.
B. Ignore security as it is not part of LLD.
C. Request adding security checks and data validation in the design.
D. Suggest removing modularity to simplify security.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recognize importance of security in LLD

    Security should be considered early to avoid costly fixes later.
  2. Step 2: Choose action that improves design quality

    Requesting security checks and validation ensures design is robust and safe.
  3. Final Answer:

    Request adding security checks and data validation in the design. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing security = request additions [OK]
Hint: Always include security early in design reviews [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring security until later stages
  • Approving incomplete designs
  • Removing modularity harms security
5. During a code review for a complex LLD, you notice the design lacks scalability considerations and testability is weak. Which combined checklist items should you prioritize to improve the design?
hard
A. Increase code comments and skip testing details.
B. Add modular components with clear interfaces and include unit test plans.
C. Focus only on UI design and ignore backend scalability.
D. Reduce the number of classes and remove error handling.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify key improvements for scalability and testability

    Modular components with clear interfaces help scale and isolate parts for testing.
  2. Step 2: Match checklist items to these improvements

    Including unit test plans ensures testability is addressed alongside modularity.
  3. Final Answer:

    Add modular components with clear interfaces and include unit test plans. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Modularity + testing plans = better scalability and testability [OK]
Hint: Combine modularity and testing for scalable, testable design [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Removing error handling weakens design
  • Ignoring backend scalability
  • Focusing only on comments without tests