Imagine you are designing a system with multiple modules that share similar logic. Why should you apply the DRY principle?
Think about how repeating the same code affects fixing bugs or adding features.
DRY helps avoid repeating code so that changes need to be made in only one place, reducing errors and saving time.
You have multiple services that need to validate user input in the same way. Which architecture approach best follows DRY?
Think about how to reuse code without copying it.
A shared library centralizes validation logic, so updates happen once and apply everywhere, following DRY.
When a system grows and new features are added, how does following DRY help with scaling?
Think about how shared code affects adding or changing features.
DRY reduces duplicated code, so changes to shared logic only need to be done once, easing scaling.
Applying DRY is good, but what problem can happen if you try to share code too much?
Think about what happens if many parts depend on the same code.
Over-sharing code can cause tight coupling, so a small change affects many parts, increasing risk.
You have many microservices that need consistent logging. Which approach best applies DRY?
Think about how to reuse logging logic without duplication across services.
A centralized logging service or shared library ensures consistent logging and avoids code duplication, following DRY.