Bird
Raised Fist0
LLDsystem_design~5 mins

Adapter pattern in LLD - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Recall & Review
beginner
What is the Adapter pattern in software design?
The Adapter pattern allows two incompatible interfaces to work together by converting the interface of one class into another expected by clients.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why is the Adapter pattern useful in system design?
It helps reuse existing code with incompatible interfaces without changing their source code, promoting flexibility and easier integration.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What are the main components of the Adapter pattern?
1. Target: The interface expected by the client.
2. Adaptee: The existing incompatible interface.
3. Adapter: Converts Adaptee's interface to Target's interface.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does the Adapter pattern differ from the Decorator pattern?
Adapter changes an interface to match another, while Decorator adds new behavior to an object without changing its interface.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Give a real-life analogy for the Adapter pattern.
An electrical plug adapter lets a plug from one country fit into a socket of another country by converting the plug shape, similar to how software adapters convert interfaces.
Click to reveal answer
What role does the Adapter play in the Adapter pattern?
ARemoves unused methods
BAdds new features to an object
CCreates new objects
DConverts one interface to another compatible interface
Which component in the Adapter pattern is the existing incompatible interface?
AAdaptee
BAdapter
CClient
DTarget
The Adapter pattern is mainly used to:
AAllow incompatible interfaces to work together
BAdd new behavior to objects
CCreate new classes dynamically
DManage object lifecycles
Which of the following is NOT a benefit of using the Adapter pattern?
ACode reuse without modification
BInterface compatibility
CAdding new methods to existing classes
DFlexibility in integrating legacy systems
In a real-world example, an electrical plug adapter is similar to which software design pattern?
ASingleton
BAdapter
CObserver
DFactory
Explain the Adapter pattern and its main components with a simple example.
Think about how two incompatible things can work together using a converter.
You got /5 concepts.
    Describe a scenario where using the Adapter pattern improves system design.
    Consider integrating old and new systems.
    You got /3 concepts.

      Practice

      (1/5)
      1. What is the main purpose of the Adapter pattern in system design?
      easy
      A. To improve the performance of a system by caching results
      B. To allow incompatible interfaces to work together by converting one interface to another
      C. To store data persistently in a database
      D. To create multiple instances of a class

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand the Adapter pattern role

        The Adapter pattern acts as a bridge between two incompatible interfaces, allowing them to communicate.
      2. Step 2: Compare with other options

        The other options describe different design goals unrelated to interface compatibility.
      3. Final Answer:

        To allow incompatible interfaces to work together by converting one interface to another -> Option B
      4. Quick Check:

        Adapter pattern = interface compatibility [OK]
      Hint: Adapter = bridge between incompatible interfaces [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Confusing Adapter with Singleton or Factory patterns
      • Thinking Adapter improves performance directly
      • Assuming Adapter stores data
      2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare an Adapter class in a typical object-oriented language?
      easy
      A. class Adapter implements Adaptee { private TargetInterface target; }
      B. class Adapter extends Adaptee implements TargetInterface { }
      C. class Adapter extends TargetInterface { private Adaptee adaptee; }
      D. class Adapter implements TargetInterface { private Adaptee adaptee; }

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Identify Adapter pattern structure

        The Adapter class implements the TargetInterface and holds a reference to the Adaptee to delegate calls.
      2. Step 2: Analyze options

        class Adapter implements TargetInterface { private Adaptee adaptee; } correctly shows Adapter implementing TargetInterface and containing Adaptee. The other options misuse inheritance or interfaces.
      3. Final Answer:

        class Adapter implements TargetInterface { private Adaptee adaptee; } -> Option D
      4. Quick Check:

        Adapter implements target and wraps adaptee [OK]
      Hint: Adapter implements target interface, holds adaptee instance [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Using inheritance incorrectly instead of composition
      • Confusing which interface to implement
      • Swapping adaptee and target roles
      3. Given this Adapter pattern code snippet, what will be the output?
      class Adaptee {
        String specificRequest() { return "Adaptee response"; }
      }
      
      interface Target {
        String request();
      }
      
      class Adapter implements Target {
        private Adaptee adaptee = new Adaptee();
        public String request() {
          return adaptee.specificRequest();
        }
      }
      
      public class Main {
        public static void main(String[] args) {
          Target target = new Adapter();
          System.out.println(target.request());
        }
      }
      medium
      A. Adaptee response
      B. Target response
      C. Compilation error
      D. Runtime exception

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Trace method calls in Adapter

        The Adapter's request() calls adaptee.specificRequest(), which returns "Adaptee response".
      2. Step 2: Check main method output

        Main creates Adapter as Target and prints target.request(), so output is "Adaptee response".
      3. Final Answer:

        Adaptee response -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Adapter delegates request() to adaptee.specificRequest() [OK]
      Hint: Adapter.request() returns adaptee.specificRequest() result [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Expecting 'Target response' instead of adaptee's
      • Assuming compilation or runtime errors without cause
      • Confusing method names
      4. Identify the error in this Adapter pattern implementation:
      interface Target {
        void request();
      }
      
      class Adaptee {
        void specificRequest() { System.out.println("Adaptee called"); }
      }
      
      class Adapter implements Target {
        Adaptee adaptee = new Adaptee();
        public void request() {
          specificRequest();
        }
      }
      medium
      A. Adapter calls specificRequest() without referencing adaptee instance
      B. Adaptee should implement Target interface
      C. Adapter should extend Adaptee instead of implementing Target
      D. Target interface method signature is incorrect

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Review Adapter's request() method

        Adapter calls specificRequest() directly, but specificRequest() belongs to Adaptee instance, so it should call adaptee.specificRequest().
      2. Step 2: Validate other options

        Adaptee does not need to implement Target. Adapter implements Target correctly. Target interface method is correct.
      3. Final Answer:

        Adapter calls specificRequest() without referencing adaptee instance -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Adapter must call adaptee.specificRequest() [OK]
      Hint: Call adaptee methods via adaptee instance inside Adapter [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Calling adaptee methods without instance prefix
      • Misusing inheritance instead of composition
      • Changing Target interface unnecessarily
      5. You need to integrate a legacy payment system with a new e-commerce platform. The legacy system has a method processLegacyPayment(), but the platform expects processPayment(). How should you apply the Adapter pattern to solve this?
      hard
      A. Create a new payment system and discard the legacy system
      B. Modify the legacy system to rename processLegacyPayment() to processPayment()
      C. Create an Adapter class implementing the platform's payment interface and inside it call processLegacyPayment() of the legacy system
      D. Use inheritance to make the legacy system extend the platform's payment interface

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand integration requirement

        The platform expects processPayment(), but legacy system only has processLegacyPayment().
      2. Step 2: Apply Adapter pattern

        Create an Adapter that implements the platform interface and inside calls legacy's processLegacyPayment() to adapt calls without changing legacy code.
      3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

        Modifying the legacy code is risky. Discarding the legacy system is costly. Using inheritance is not possible if the legacy system is not designed for it.
      4. Final Answer:

        Create an Adapter class implementing the platform's payment interface and inside it call processLegacyPayment() of the legacy system -> Option C
      5. Quick Check:

        Adapter wraps legacy method to match platform interface [OK]
      Hint: Adapter wraps legacy calls to match new interface [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Changing legacy code directly
      • Ignoring Adapter pattern benefits
      • Trying inheritance when not supported
      Recommended

      Ready to prove it?

      Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

      10 questions~5 mineasy hard