Pod Disruption Budgets in Kubernetes - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is a Pod Disruption Budget (PDB) in Kubernetes?

A Pod Disruption Budget is a Kubernetes resource that limits the number of pods of a service that can be voluntarily disrupted at the same time, ensuring availability during maintenance or upgrades.

beginner

Which field in a Pod Disruption Budget specifies how many pods can be unavailable during voluntary disruptions?

The maxUnavailable field sets the maximum number or percentage of pods that can be unavailable during voluntary disruptions.

intermediate

What is the difference between voluntary and involuntary disruptions in Kubernetes?

Voluntary disruptions are planned actions like node draining or pod eviction. Involuntary disruptions are unexpected failures like node crashes. PDBs only control voluntary disruptions.

intermediate

How does Kubernetes behave if a Pod Disruption Budget is violated during a voluntary disruption?

Kubernetes will block the voluntary disruption if it would cause the number of available pods to fall below the PDB's allowed threshold, protecting service availability.

beginner

Show a simple YAML snippet of a Pod Disruption Budget that allows at most 1 pod to be unavailable.

apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget metadata: name: example-pdb spec: maxUnavailable: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: myapp

What does a Pod Disruption Budget control in Kubernetes?

A The CPU usage of pods

B The total number of pods in a cluster

C The number of pods that can be voluntarily disrupted at once

D The network bandwidth of pods

A Pod Disruption Budget limits voluntary disruptions to maintain availability.

Which of these is NOT controlled by a Pod Disruption Budget?

A Unexpected node crashes

B Node draining disruptions

C Voluntary pod evictions

D Rolling updates

PDBs do not control involuntary disruptions like node crashes.

In a PDB, what does setting maxUnavailable: 2 mean?

A At most 2 pods can be unavailable during voluntary disruptions

B Exactly 2 pods must be unavailable

C No pods can be disrupted

D 2 pods will be restarted automatically

maxUnavailable sets the maximum number of pods allowed to be down during voluntary disruptions.

If a PDB is violated, what happens when you try to drain a node?

A The node drains immediately ignoring the PDB

B The drain command is blocked until pods are available

C The pods are deleted forcibly

D Nothing happens, PDBs are only informational

Kubernetes blocks voluntary disruptions that violate the PDB to protect availability.

Which selector does a Pod Disruption Budget use to identify pods it protects?

A Service selector

B Node selector

C Namespace selector

D Label selector

PDBs use label selectors to match the pods they protect.

Explain what a Pod Disruption Budget is and why it is important in Kubernetes.

Think about how Kubernetes manages pod availability during maintenance.

Describe how you would create a Pod Disruption Budget to allow only one pod to be disrupted at a time for an app labeled 'webapp'.

Focus on the key fields in the PDB YAML.

Practice

1. What is the main purpose of a Pod Disruption Budget in Kubernetes?

easy

A. To ensure a minimum number of pods stay available during planned disruptions

B. To automatically restart pods when they crash

C. To scale pods up or down based on CPU usage

D. To backup pod data before deletion

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand Pod Disruption Budget purpose

   A Pod Disruption Budget (PDB) is designed to keep your app available during planned changes by limiting voluntary disruptions.

2. Step 2: Match purpose to options

   To ensure a minimum number of pods stay available during planned disruptions correctly states that PDB ensures a minimum number of pods remain running during disruptions, unlike other options which describe unrelated features.

3. Final Answer:

   To ensure a minimum number of pods stay available during planned disruptions -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Pod Disruption Budget = availability during disruptions [OK]

Hint: PDB = minimum pods running during planned changes [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing PDB with auto-scaling
• Thinking PDB restarts crashed pods
• Assuming PDB backs up pod data

2. Which of the following is the correct way to specify a Pod Disruption Budget that allows at most 1 pod disruption at a time for pods with label app=web?

easy

A. apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
name: pdb-web
spec:
maxUnavailable: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web
minReadySeconds: 10

B. apiVersion: v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
name: pdb-web
spec:
minAvailable: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web

C. apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
name: pdb-web
spec:
maxUnavailable: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web
strategy: RollingUpdate

D. apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
name: pdb-web
spec:
maxUnavailable: 1
selector:
matchLabels:
app: web

Solution

1. Step 1: Check API version and kind

   The correct API version for PDB is policy/v1 and kind is PodDisruptionBudget.

2. Step 2: Validate spec fields for maxUnavailable and selector

   apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget metadata: name: pdb-web spec: maxUnavailable: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: web correctly uses maxUnavailable: 1 and a selector matching label app: web. Other options either use wrong API version, extra unsupported fields, or wrong spec keys.

3. Final Answer:

   apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget metadata: name: pdb-web spec: maxUnavailable: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: web -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Correct API and maxUnavailable syntax = apiVersion: policy/v1 kind: PodDisruptionBudget metadata: name: pdb-web spec: maxUnavailable: 1 selector: matchLabels: app: web [OK]

Hint: Use policy/v1 and maxUnavailable with correct selector [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong API version like v1
• Adding unsupported fields like strategy
• Confusing minAvailable with maxUnavailable

3. Given this Pod Disruption Budget YAML snippet:

spec:
  minAvailable: 3
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: backend

If there are 5 pods with label app=backend, how many pods can be disrupted at once without violating the PDB?

medium

A. 3 pods

B. 2 pods

C. 5 pods

D. 0 pods

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand minAvailable meaning

   minAvailable: 3 means at least 3 pods must stay running during disruptions.

2. Step 2: Calculate allowed disruptions

   With 5 pods total, maximum disruptions allowed = 5 - 3 = 2 pods.

3. Final Answer:

   2 pods -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   5 total - 3 minAvailable = 2 allowed disruptions [OK]

Hint: Allowed disruptions = total pods - minAvailable [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing minAvailable with maxUnavailable
• Assuming all pods can be disrupted
• Ignoring total pod count

4. You applied this Pod Disruption Budget:

apiVersion: policy/v1
kind: PodDisruptionBudget
metadata:
  name: pdb-db
spec:
  maxUnavailable: 2
  selector:
    matchLabels:
      app: database

But Kubernetes reports an error: "spec.maxUnavailable: Invalid value: "2": must be less than the number of pods selected by the label selector". What is the likely cause?

medium

A. There are fewer than 3 pods with label app=database

B. maxUnavailable must be a percentage, not a number

C. The selector label is incorrect syntax

D. PodDisruptionBudget requires minAvailable, not maxUnavailable

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand maxUnavailable validation

   maxUnavailable must be less than the total number of pods matched by the selector.

2. Step 2: Analyze error message meaning

   The error says "must be less than the number of pods" meaning the number of pods with label app=database is less than or equal to 2.

3. Final Answer:

   There are fewer than 3 pods with label app=database -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   maxUnavailable < total pods = error if not [OK]

Hint: maxUnavailable must be less than pod count [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using maxUnavailable as percentage incorrectly
• Miswriting selector labels
• Thinking minAvailable is mandatory

5. You have a deployment with 10 pods labeled app=frontend. You want to ensure that during voluntary disruptions, at least 80% of pods remain available. Which Pod Disruption Budget spec is correct?

hard

A. spec:
minAvailable: 80
selector:
matchLabels:
app: frontend

B. spec:
maxUnavailable: 8
selector:
matchLabels:
app: frontend

C. spec:
maxUnavailable: 20%
selector:
matchLabels:
app: frontend

D. spec:
minAvailable: 20%
selector:
matchLabels:
app: frontend

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand percentage usage in PDB

   maxUnavailable and minAvailable can accept percentages. To keep 80% available, maxUnavailable should be 20%.

2. Step 2: Evaluate options for correctness

   spec: minAvailable: 80 selector: matchLabels: app: frontend: minAvailable: 80 - absolute value exceeds total pods (10) - invalid.
   spec: maxUnavailable: 8 selector: matchLabels: app: frontend: maxUnavailable: 8 - allows 8 pods unavailable (only 20% available) - insufficient.
   spec: maxUnavailable: 20% selector: matchLabels: app: frontend: maxUnavailable: 20% - allows 20% (~2 pods) unavailable - ensures 80% available - correct.
   spec: minAvailable: 20% selector: matchLabels: app: frontend: minAvailable: 20% - ensures only at least 20% available - insufficient.

3. Final Answer:

   spec: maxUnavailable: 20% selector: matchLabels: app: frontend -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   20% maxUnavailable = 80% pods available [OK]

Hint: Use maxUnavailable: 20% to keep 80% pods up [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using minAvailable with percentage incorrectly
• Confusing absolute numbers with percentages
• Not matching selector labels properly