Bird
Raised Fist0
HLDsystem_design~25 mins

CQRS (Command Query Responsibility Segregation) in HLD - System Design Exercise

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Design: CQRS-based System
Design the architecture separating command and query responsibilities including data flow, components, and database schema. Out of scope: detailed UI design and specific technology vendor choices.
Functional Requirements
FR1: Separate the system into command (write) and query (read) parts
FR2: Ensure commands update data consistently
FR3: Allow queries to be optimized for fast reads
FR4: Support eventual consistency between command and query data stores
FR5: Handle 10,000 concurrent users with 70% read and 30% write operations
FR6: API response time for queries should be under 150ms at p99
FR7: System availability should be 99.9%
Non-Functional Requirements
NFR1: Data consistency between command and query sides can be eventual, not immediate
NFR2: Write operations must be strongly consistent
NFR3: Read operations should not block writes
NFR4: System must scale horizontally
NFR5: Latency for command processing should be under 300ms
Think Before You Design
Questions to Ask
❓ Question 1
❓ Question 2
❓ Question 3
❓ Question 4
❓ Question 5
Key Components
API Gateway or Load Balancer
Command Service (handling writes)
Query Service (handling reads)
Command Database (transactional, relational or NoSQL)
Query Database (optimized for fast reads, possibly denormalized)
Event Bus or Message Queue for synchronization
Event Processor to update query database
Cache layer for queries
Design Patterns
Event Sourcing to capture all changes as events
Eventual Consistency for syncing read models
CQRS pattern itself for separation of concerns
Asynchronous messaging for decoupling command and query sides
Reference Architecture
          +-----------------+          
          |   API Gateway   |          
          +--------+--------+          
                   |                   
        +----------+----------+        
        |                     |        
+-------v-------+     +-------v-------+
| Command       |     | Query         |
| Service       |     | Service       |
+-------+-------+     +-------+-------+
        |                     |        
+-------v-------+             |        
| Command DB    |             |        
+-------+-------+             |        
        |                     |        
        |   Event Bus / MQ     |        
        +----------+----------+        
                   |                   
          +--------v--------+          
          | Event Processor |          
          +--------+--------+          
                   |                   
          +--------v--------+          
          | Query DB        |          
          +-----------------+          
Components
API Gateway
Nginx or AWS API Gateway
Routes requests to command or query services based on operation type
Command Service
REST/GraphQL API with transactional support
Handles all write operations ensuring strong consistency
Query Service
REST/GraphQL API optimized for read queries
Handles all read operations optimized for low latency
Command Database
Relational DB like PostgreSQL or NoSQL with ACID support
Stores the authoritative data for writes
Event Bus / Message Queue
Kafka, RabbitMQ, or AWS SNS/SQS
Transports events from command side to query side asynchronously
Event Processor
Microservice or Lambda function
Consumes events and updates the query database accordingly
Query Database
NoSQL DB like Elasticsearch or DynamoDB optimized for reads
Stores denormalized data optimized for fast queries
Cache Layer
Redis or Memcached
Speeds up frequent read queries
Request Flow
1. Client sends a write request to API Gateway
2. API Gateway routes the request to Command Service
3. Command Service validates and writes data to Command Database within a transaction
4. Command Service publishes an event describing the change to the Event Bus
5. Event Processor consumes the event asynchronously from the Event Bus
6. Event Processor updates the Query Database to reflect the change
7. Client sends a read request to API Gateway
8. API Gateway routes the request to Query Service
9. Query Service reads data from Query Database or Cache and returns response
Database Schema
Entities: User, Order, Product Command DB: normalized tables with foreign keys for consistency Query DB: denormalized documents or tables optimized for query patterns Relationships: User 1:N Orders, Order N:M Products via OrderProduct junction Events capture changes like OrderCreated, ProductUpdated
Scaling Discussion
Bottlenecks
Command Database write throughput limits
Event Bus message backlog under high write load
Event Processor lag causing stale query data
Query Database read load spikes
Cache invalidation complexity
Solutions
Scale Command Database vertically or shard by user or entity
Partition Event Bus topics and increase consumer instances
Parallelize Event Processors and use checkpointing
Use read replicas and horizontal scaling for Query Database
Implement cache expiration and event-driven cache invalidation
Interview Tips
Time: Spend 10 minutes understanding requirements and clarifying consistency needs, 15 minutes designing components and data flow, 10 minutes discussing scaling and trade-offs, 10 minutes for Q&A
Explain the separation of command and query responsibilities clearly
Discuss consistency trade-offs and eventual consistency implications
Highlight asynchronous event-driven communication
Mention database choices for transactional writes vs fast reads
Address scaling bottlenecks and solutions realistically