0
0
HLDsystem_design~25 mins

Multi-level caching in HLD - System Design Exercise

Choose your learning style9 modes available
Design: Multi-level Caching System
Design focuses on read path caching with multiple cache layers and cache consistency. Write path and cache invalidation strategies are included at a high level. Out of scope: detailed database schema design and write-heavy workload optimization.
Functional Requirements
FR1: Serve data requests with minimal latency
FR2: Support multiple cache layers (e.g., in-memory, distributed cache, disk cache)
FR3: Ensure cache consistency and freshness
FR4: Handle cache misses by fetching data from the primary database
FR5: Support high read throughput with low latency
FR6: Provide fallback mechanisms if a cache layer fails
Non-Functional Requirements
NFR1: System must handle 100,000 read requests per second
NFR2: P99 latency for cache hits should be under 5 milliseconds
NFR3: Availability target of 99.9% uptime
NFR4: Cache layers should have configurable expiration policies
NFR5: Data consistency should be eventual between cache layers and database
Think Before You Design
Questions to Ask
❓ Question 1
❓ Question 2
❓ Question 3
❓ Question 4
❓ Question 5
❓ Question 6
Key Components
Client application or service
In-memory cache (e.g., local cache like LRU cache)
Distributed cache (e.g., Redis, Memcached)
Persistent cache or disk cache layer
Primary database
Cache invalidation and refresh mechanism
Monitoring and metrics system
Design Patterns
Cache-aside pattern
Write-through and write-back caching
Cache invalidation strategies (time-based, event-based)
Multi-level cache hierarchy
Fallback and retry mechanisms
Reference Architecture
Client
  |
  v
Local In-Memory Cache (Level 1)
  |
  v
Distributed Cache (Level 2)
  |
  v
Persistent Cache / Disk Cache (Level 3)
  |
  v
Primary Database

Monitoring & Metrics system observes all layers
Components
Client
Any application or service
Sends data requests and receives responses
Local In-Memory Cache (Level 1)
LRU Cache or similar in-memory cache
Fastest cache layer to serve frequent requests with minimal latency
Distributed Cache (Level 2)
Redis or Memcached cluster
Shared cache across multiple clients or servers to reduce database load
Persistent Cache / Disk Cache (Level 3)
SSD-based cache or local disk cache
Stores less frequently accessed data with higher latency but larger capacity
Primary Database
Relational or NoSQL database
Source of truth for all data
Cache Invalidation and Refresh Mechanism
Background jobs or event-driven triggers
Keeps cache data fresh and consistent with the database
Monitoring and Metrics System
Prometheus, Grafana, or similar
Tracks cache hit rates, latencies, errors, and system health
Request Flow
1. Client sends a data request.
2. Request checks Local In-Memory Cache (Level 1). If hit, return data immediately.
3. If miss, request goes to Distributed Cache (Level 2). If hit, return data and update Level 1 cache.
4. If miss again, request goes to Persistent Cache (Level 3). If hit, return data and update Level 2 and Level 1 caches.
5. If still miss, fetch data from Primary Database.
6. Update all cache layers with fresh data.
7. Return data to client.
8. Cache invalidation jobs run periodically or are triggered by data changes to refresh or remove stale cache entries.
Database Schema
Entities: - DataItem(id, value, last_updated) Relationships: - No complex relationships needed for caching; primary key 'id' used for cache keys. Cache entries map to DataItem by id with expiration timestamps.
Scaling Discussion
Bottlenecks
Local in-memory cache size limits and eviction under high load
Distributed cache network latency and throughput limits
Cache consistency delays causing stale data
Database overload on cache misses
Cache invalidation complexity at scale
Solutions
Use efficient eviction policies and increase local cache size with memory optimization
Scale distributed cache horizontally with sharding and clustering
Implement event-driven cache invalidation and TTLs to reduce staleness
Use read replicas and database sharding to handle load
Automate cache invalidation with messaging systems and monitor cache freshness
Interview Tips
Time: Spend 10 minutes understanding requirements and clarifying constraints, 20 minutes designing the multi-level cache architecture and data flow, 10 minutes discussing scaling and trade-offs, and 5 minutes summarizing.
Explain why multi-level caching reduces latency and load
Describe cache hit and miss flows clearly
Discuss cache consistency and invalidation strategies
Highlight scalability challenges and solutions
Mention monitoring importance for cache health