Which statement best describes the difference in abstraction between High-Level Design (HLD) and Low-Level Design (LLD)?
Think about which design level shows the big picture and which one shows the detailed steps.
HLD provides a broad overview of the system architecture and major components. LLD breaks down these components into detailed logic, algorithms, and data structures.
Given a design document, which element belongs to Low-Level Design (LLD) rather than High-Level Design (HLD)?
LLD focuses on detailed design inside components, such as classes and methods.
Class diagrams with methods and attributes are detailed and part of LLD. System interaction and architecture diagrams are part of HLD.
When designing a large-scale system, which design level primarily addresses how to scale components and manage system capacity?
Consider which design level deals with system-wide structure and capacity planning.
HLD addresses scaling by defining components, their interactions, and system capacity. LLD focuses on internal component details, not overall scaling.
What is a key tradeoff when deciding how much detail to include in High-Level Design versus Low-Level Design?
Think about clarity for different audiences and stages of development.
HLD should be clear and not too detailed to avoid confusion among stakeholders. LLD needs enough detail to guide developers and avoid errors.
A project manager wants to allocate design time between High-Level Design and Low-Level Design for a complex system. Which estimation is most reasonable?
Consider which design phase requires more detailed work and documentation.
LLD involves detailed design of components, algorithms, and data structures, which usually takes more time than the broader HLD phase.