Assuming map and reduce run one after another on one machine
Thinking reduce deletes data before map
Believing map sorts data before reduce
4. Look at this incorrect statement about MapReduce: MapReduce processes data chunks one by one to avoid errors. What is the main problem with this statement?
medium
A. MapReduce only works on small data, not big data
B. MapReduce does not process data chunks at all
C. MapReduce actually processes chunks in parallel, not one by one
D. MapReduce deletes data chunks before processing
Solution
Step 1: Understand MapReduce processing style
MapReduce splits data and processes chunks at the same time (parallel), not one after another.
Step 2: Identify the error in the statement
The statement says 'one by one', which is incorrect for MapReduce's parallel design.
Final Answer:
MapReduce actually processes chunks in parallel, not one by one -> Option C
Quick Check:
MapReduce = parallel chunk processing, not sequential [OK]
Hint: MapReduce runs chunks in parallel, not sequentially [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking MapReduce processes chunks sequentially
Believing MapReduce only works on small data
Assuming MapReduce deletes data chunks
5. You have a huge dataset that takes 10 hours to process on one machine. Using MapReduce, you split the data into 10 equal chunks and process them in parallel on 10 machines. Ignoring overhead, how long should the processing take approximately, and why?
hard
A. About 10 hours, because splitting data doesn't change total time
B. About 5 hours, because half the data is processed in parallel
C. About 100 hours, because parallel processing adds extra time
D. About 1 hour, because each chunk runs at the same time on different machines
Solution
Step 1: Understand parallel processing effect
Splitting data into 10 chunks and running on 10 machines means all chunks run at the same time.
Step 2: Calculate approximate time
Each chunk is 1/10th of data, so each machine takes about 1 hour, running simultaneously.
Final Answer:
About 1 hour, because each chunk runs at the same time on different machines -> Option D
Quick Check:
Parallel 10 chunks = 10x faster, so ~1 hour [OK]
Hint: Parallel 10 chunks on 10 machines cuts time by 10 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring parallelism and thinking time stays 10 hours
Assuming parallel adds extra time instead of reducing
Calculating half time instead of dividing by 10
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.