Given the following GraphQL mutation to create a new user, what will be the output if the mutation is successful?
mutation {
createUser(input: {name: "Alice", email: "alice@example.com"}) {
id
name
email
}
}Successful mutations return the created object with requested fields.
The mutation returns the newly created user object with all requested fields: id, name, and email.
Which option correctly fixes the syntax error in this GraphQL mutation?
mutation {
createUser(input: {name: "Bob", email: "bob@example.com") {
id
name
}
}Check for balanced parentheses and correct object syntax.
Option C correctly closes the input object with a closing brace and parenthesis.
You want to create a new post but only need the post ID in the response. Which mutation query is optimized for this?
mutation {
createPost(input: {title: "Hello", content: "World"}) {
id
title
content
createdAt
}
}Request only the fields you need to reduce response size.
Option A requests only the post ID, minimizing data returned.
Given this mutation, why does it return an error?
mutation {
createUser(input: {name: "Eve"}) {
id
name
email
}
}Check required input fields in the schema.
The input requires an email field which is missing, so the server returns a validation error.
Why do GraphQL mutations commonly use an input type object for arguments instead of separate scalar arguments?
Think about how input objects help organize data.
Input types group related fields into one argument, making mutations easier to maintain and extend.