Which scenario best justifies using a monorepo instead of multiple repositories?
Think about how often code is shared and how closely components are related.
A monorepo works best when components are tightly coupled and share code often, making coordination easier.
What is the biggest challenge when using multiple repositories for related projects?
Consider what happens when changes affect multiple repositories.
Multi-repos require careful coordination to keep versions compatible and changes synchronized.
In a large monorepo, what is a common workflow challenge when multiple teams work on different components?
Think about what happens when many people edit the same repository at once.
Monorepos can cause merge conflicts and slow integration because many changes happen in one place.
You have multiple repositories with interdependent projects. After updating a shared library in one repo, dependent repos fail to build. What is the most likely cause?
Consider how dependencies are managed across repositories.
Dependent repos must update their references to the new library version to build successfully.
What is a recommended best practice to keep a large monorepo manageable as it grows?
Think about how to reduce unnecessary work when many components exist.
Running tests and builds only on changed parts helps keep CI fast and efficient in large monorepos.