Merge strategies overview in Git - Interactive Code Practice

Practice - 5 Tasks

1fill in blank

easy

Complete the command to merge branch 'feature' into the current branch using the default merge strategy.

Git

git merge [1]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Acheckout

Bcommit

Cfeature

Drebase

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using 'commit' instead of the branch name.

Confusing 'rebase' with 'merge'.

Using 'checkout' which switches branches instead of merging.

The command git merge feature merges the 'feature' branch into the current branch using the default merge strategy.

2fill in blank

medium

Complete the command to merge branch 'feature' using the 'ours' merge strategy.

Git

git merge -s [1] feature

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Arecursive

Bours

Cresolve

Doctopus

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using 'recursive' which is the default strategy.

Using 'resolve' which is for simple merges.

Using 'octopus' which is for merging multiple branches.

The 'ours' merge strategy keeps the current branch's changes and ignores the other branch's changes during the merge.

3fill in blank

hard

Fix the error in the command to merge branch 'feature' using rebase instead of merge.

Git

git [1] feature

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Acommit

Bmerge

Ccheckout

Drebase

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using 'merge' which combines branches without rewriting history.

Using 'checkout' which switches branches.

Using 'commit' which records changes.

To apply changes from 'feature' branch on top of the current branch, use git rebase feature.

4fill in blank

hard

Fill both blanks to create a merge commit with a custom message and no fast-forward.

Git

git merge --no-[1] -m [2] feature

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Aff

B"Merge commit created"

C"Custom merge message"

Dsquash

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using 'squash' instead of 'ff' for the first blank.

Not quoting the commit message.

Using default merge without message.

The --no-ff option forces a merge commit even if fast-forward is possible. The -m option sets a custom message.

5fill in blank

hard

Fill all three blanks to create a squash merge with a custom message and no commit.

Git

git merge --squash --no-[1] --[2] -m [3] feature

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Aff

Bcommit

C"Squash merge without commit"

Dno-commit

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using 'commit' instead of 'no-commit' for the second blank.

Omitting quotes around the commit message.

Using fast-forward merge instead of squash.

The --no-ff disables fast-forward, --no-commit prevents automatic commit, and -m sets the commit message for the squash merge.

Practice

1. What does the --no-ff option do when merging branches in Git?

easy

A. It creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible.

B. It squashes all commits into one before merging.

C. It deletes the source branch after merging.

D. It aborts the merge if conflicts are found.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand fast-forward merges

   A fast-forward merge moves the branch pointer forward without creating a new commit if no divergent changes exist.

2. Step 2: Effect of --no-ff

   The --no-ff option forces Git to create a merge commit even if a fast-forward is possible, preserving branch history.

3. Final Answer:

   It creates a merge commit even if a fast-forward merge is possible. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   --no-ff keeps history with merge commit [OK]

Hint: Remember: --no-ff always makes a merge commit [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing --no-ff with --squash
• Thinking it deletes branches
• Assuming it aborts on conflicts

2. Which of the following is the correct syntax to perform a squash merge of branch feature into main?

easy

A. git merge --squash feature

B. git merge feature --no-ff

C. git merge --fast-forward feature

D. git merge --abort feature

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify squash merge syntax

   The --squash option is used with git merge to combine all commits from the source branch into one commit on the target branch.

2. Step 2: Check command correctness

   git merge --squash feature is the correct syntax to squash merge the feature branch into the current branch.

3. Final Answer:

   git merge --squash feature -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Squash merge syntax = git merge --squash [OK]

Hint: Use --squash right after git merge for squash merges [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Placing --no-ff instead of --squash
• Using --abort which cancels merges
• Assuming --fast-forward is a valid option

3. Given the following commands run on branch main:

git merge feature

If feature has 3 commits and no conflicts, what will be the result in the commit history?

medium

A. A single new merge commit combining all changes from feature.

B. Merge aborted due to conflicts.

C. Three separate commits from feature added to main with no merge commit.

D. No new commits; main pointer moves forward (fast-forward).

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand default merge behavior

   By default, if the main branch has no new commits since branching, Git performs a fast-forward merge, moving the main pointer forward.

2. Step 2: Analyze the scenario

   Since feature has 3 commits and main has no new commits, Git will fast-forward main to feature's tip without creating a merge commit.

3. Final Answer:

   No new commits; main pointer moves forward (fast-forward). -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Default merge with no divergence = fast-forward [OK]

Hint: If no new commits on main, merge fast-forwards [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Assuming a merge commit is always created
• Thinking commits are duplicated
• Confusing conflicts with no conflicts

4. You tried to merge branch feature into main using git merge feature, but Git reports conflicts. What is the best way to resolve this?

medium

A. Delete the feature branch and start over.

B. Run git merge --abort to cancel the merge and lose changes.

C. Manually edit conflicting files, then run git add and git commit.

D. Use git reset --hard to force merge.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand merge conflicts

   Conflicts occur when Git cannot automatically combine changes. Manual intervention is needed to fix conflicting files.

2. Step 2: Resolve conflicts properly

   Edit the conflicting files to fix issues, then stage changes with git add and complete the merge with git commit.

3. Final Answer:

   Manually edit conflicting files, then run git add and git commit. -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Resolve conflicts manually, then add and commit [OK]

Hint: Fix conflicts manually, then add and commit [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Aborting merge loses progress
• Deleting branches unnecessarily
• Using reset which discards changes

5. You want to merge a long-lived feature branch into main but keep the commit history clean with a single commit representing all changes. Which merge strategy should you use and what is the correct sequence?

hard

A. Use git merge --no-ff feature to keep all commits and a merge commit.

B. Use git merge --squash feature then commit manually.

C. Use git rebase main feature then fast-forward merge.

D. Delete feature and copy files manually.

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify goal - single commit for all changes

   Squash merge combines all commits from the feature branch into one commit on main, keeping history clean.

2. Step 2: Correct merge sequence

   Run git merge --squash feature to prepare changes, then create a new commit manually with git commit.

3. Final Answer:

   Use git merge --squash feature then commit manually. -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Squash merge + manual commit = single clean commit [OK]

Hint: Squash merge then commit for one clean commit [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using --no-ff which keeps all commits
• Confusing rebase with squash merge
• Deleting branches instead of merging