Why Handling PR feedback and updates in Git? - Purpose & Use Cases

The Big Idea

What if you could fix feedback without juggling emails and lost files?

The Scenario

Imagine you just submitted your code changes to a project and your teammate sends you a list of feedback points. You have to manually find each comment, update your files, and then send a new version by email or chat.

The Problem

This manual way is slow and confusing. You might miss some feedback, accidentally overwrite changes, or create multiple versions that are hard to track. It's easy to lose track of what was fixed and what still needs work.

The Solution

Using Pull Requests (PRs) with git, you can reply directly to feedback, update your code in the same PR, and keep all changes and conversations in one place. This makes collaboration clear, fast, and organized.

Before vs After

✗ Before

Edit files locally
Email updated files
Wait for reply

✓ After

git checkout -b fix-feedback
Make changes
git commit -am 'Address feedback'
git push
Update PR automatically

What It Enables

It enables smooth teamwork where everyone can see progress, discuss changes, and improve code together without confusion.

Real Life Example

A developer submits a PR for a new feature. Reviewers comment on some lines. The developer updates the code in the same PR, and reviewers see the changes instantly, speeding up approval and merging.

Key Takeaways

Manual feedback handling is slow and error-prone.

PRs keep feedback and updates organized in one place.

Collaboration becomes faster and clearer.

Practice

1. When you receive feedback on a pull request (PR), what is the first step to update your code accordingly?

easy

A. Check out the feature branch locally to make changes

B. Merge the main branch into your feature branch without changes

C. Close the PR and create a new one

D. Delete the feature branch and start over

Solution

1. Step 1: Switch to the feature branch

   You need to work on the branch where the PR was created to apply feedback changes.

2. Step 2: Make the necessary code updates

   After switching, edit the code to address the feedback.

3. Final Answer:

   Check out the feature branch locally to make changes -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Update code on feature branch = A [OK]

Hint: Always update code on the feature branch first [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Trying to update main branch instead of feature branch
• Closing PR unnecessarily
• Starting a new branch without reason

2. Which git command correctly stages all changed files before committing updates for a PR?

easy

A. git commit -a -m "Update code"

B. git checkout -b update-branch

C. git push origin main

D. git add .

Solution

1. Step 1: Stage all changes

   The command git add . stages all modified and new files in the current directory.

2. Step 2: Commit the staged changes

   After staging, you use git commit -m "message" to save changes locally.

3. Final Answer:

   git add . -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Stage all changes = git add . [OK]

Hint: Use 'git add .' to stage all changes before commit [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using git commit -a without staging new files
• Pushing before committing
• Creating new branches unnecessarily

3. Given the following commands run in sequence on a feature branch:

git add file.txt
git commit -m "Fix typo"
git push origin feature-branch

What happens to the existing pull request linked to feature-branch?

medium

A. A new pull request is created

B. The pull request updates automatically with the new commit

C. The pull request is closed

D. Nothing changes until you merge manually

Solution

1. Step 1: Push updates to the feature branch

   Pushing commits to the branch linked to the PR updates the PR automatically.

2. Step 2: PR reflects new commits

   The PR shows the new changes for reviewers to see and re-review.

3. Final Answer:

   The pull request updates automatically with the new commit -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Push to feature branch updates PR = A [OK]

Hint: Push changes to update existing PR automatically [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking a new PR is needed for each update
• Believing PR closes on push
• Assuming manual merge needed to update PR

4. You tried to push updates to your feature branch but got this error:
! [rejected] feature-branch -> feature-branch (non-fast-forward)
What is the best way to fix this?

medium

A. Pull latest changes from remote and rebase before pushing

B. Delete the remote branch and push again

C. Force push with git push --force

D. Create a new branch and push there

Solution

1. Step 1: Fetch and rebase remote changes

   Run git pull --rebase origin feature-branch to update your local branch with remote changes without merge commits.

2. Step 2: Push the rebased branch

   After rebasing, push your changes normally with git push origin feature-branch.

3. Final Answer:

   Pull latest changes from remote and rebase before pushing -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Fix non-fast-forward by rebasing and pushing = C [OK]

Hint: Rebase remote changes before pushing to avoid errors [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using force push without caution
• Deleting remote branch unnecessarily
• Creating new branches instead of syncing

5. You have multiple commits in your feature branch but want to combine them into one clean commit before updating the PR. Which sequence of commands achieves this?

hard

A. git merge main; git commit -m "Clean update"; git push

B. git rebase -i main; edit commits; git push

C. git reset --soft HEAD~3; git commit -m "Clean update"; git push --force

D. git checkout main; git cherry-pick feature-branch; git push

Solution

1. Step 1: Soft reset last 3 commits

   git reset --soft HEAD~3 moves HEAD back but keeps changes staged, allowing to combine commits.

2. Step 2: Create a single new commit and force push

   Commit staged changes with a new message, then force push to update PR with one clean commit.

3. Final Answer:

   git reset --soft HEAD~3; git commit -m "Clean update"; git push --force -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Combine commits by soft reset and force push = B [OK]

Hint: Use soft reset and force push to squash commits [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using merge instead of squash
• Forgetting to force push after rewriting history
• Incorrectly rebasing without editing commits