This Flask app has a route that calls an external API. The test function mocks the external call to return fixed data. When run, it prints the mocked JSON response.
Flask
from flask import Flask, jsonify
import requests
from unittest.mock import patch
app = Flask(__name__)
@app.route('/data')
def get_data():
response = requests.get('http://external-service.com/api')
if response.status_code == 200:
return jsonify(response.json())
else:
return jsonify({'error': 'Failed to get data'}), 500
@patch('requests.get')
def test_get_data(mock_get):
mock_get.return_value.status_code = 200
mock_get.return_value.json.return_value = {'name': 'Test User', 'age': 30}
with app.test_client() as client:
response = client.get('/data')
print(response.json)
if __name__ == '__main__':
test_get_data()
OutputSuccess
Important Notes
Always patch the exact location where the external call is used, not where it is defined.
Mocking helps keep tests fast and reliable.
Summary
Mock external services to test your Flask app without real network calls.
Use unittest.mock.patch to replace external calls with fake responses.
This makes your tests faster, more reliable, and easier to control.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main reason to mock external services in Flask testing?
easy
A. To change the Flask app configuration permanently
B. To speed up the Flask server in production
C. To add more routes to the Flask app
D. To avoid making real network calls during tests
Solution
Step 1: Understand the purpose of mocking
Mocking replaces real external calls with fake ones to avoid delays and failures during tests.
Step 2: Identify the benefit in Flask testing
This avoids real network calls, making tests faster and more reliable.
Final Answer:
To avoid making real network calls during tests -> Option D
Quick Check:
Mocking = Avoid real network calls [OK]
Hint: Mock to skip real network calls in tests [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking mocking speeds up production
Confusing mocking with adding routes
Believing mocking changes app config permanently
2. Which of the following is the correct way to patch an external function requests.get in a Flask test using unittest.mock?
easy
A. with patch('requests.get') as mock_get:
B. with patch(requests.get) as mock_get:
C. with patch('requests->get') as mock_get:
D. with patch('requests_get') as mock_get:
Solution
Step 1: Understand patch syntax
Patch requires the full path as a string, e.g., 'requests.get'.
Step 2: Identify correct string format
with patch('requests.get') as mock_get: uses the correct string 'requests.get'. Others use invalid syntax or missing quotes.
Final Answer:
with patch('requests.get') as mock_get: -> Option A
Quick Check:
Patch needs string path = with patch('requests.get') as mock_get: [OK]
Hint: Patch uses string path like 'module.function' [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Passing function object instead of string
Using wrong string format with arrows
Missing quotes around patch target
3. Given this Flask test code snippet, what will be printed?
from unittest.mock import patch
import requests
def fetch_data():
response = requests.get('http://example.com')
return response.status_code
with patch('requests.get') as mock_get:
mock_get.return_value.status_code = 404
print(fetch_data())
medium
A. None
B. 200
C. 404
D. Raises an error
Solution
Step 1: Understand patch effect on requests.get
The patch replaces requests.get with a mock whose return_value.status_code is set to 404.
Step 2: Trace fetch_data call inside patch
fetch_data calls requests.get, which returns the mock with status_code 404, so fetch_data returns 404.
4. What is wrong with this Flask test code that tries to mock requests.post?
from unittest.mock import patch
import requests
def send_data():
response = requests.post('http://example.com', data={'key': 'value'})
return response.ok
with patch('requests.post') as mock_post:
mock_post.ok = True
print(send_data())
medium
A. mock_post.ok should be set on return_value, not mock_post
B. patch target should be 'requests.get' not 'requests.post'
C. send_data should use requests.get instead of post
D. mock_post.ok is correct and code works fine
Solution
Step 1: Identify mock object usage
mock_post is the mock for requests.post function, its return_value simulates the response object.
Step 2: Correct attribute assignment
Setting mock_post.ok sets attribute on the function mock, not the response. It should be mock_post.return_value.ok = True.
Final Answer:
mock_post.ok should be set on return_value, not mock_post -> Option A
Quick Check:
Mock response attributes go on return_value [OK]
Hint: Set mock response attributes on return_value [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting attributes on mock function instead of return_value
Confusing post with get method
Assuming code works without fixing mock
5. You want to test a Flask route that calls an external API and returns JSON data. Which approach correctly mocks the external API call and returns a custom JSON response {"success": true} during the test?
hard
A. Use patch on the Flask route function and return {"success": true} directly
B. Use patch on the external call, set return_value.json.return_value = {"success": true}
C. Call the real external API and check if it returns {"success": true}
D. Mock the Flask app config to include {"success": true}
Solution
Step 1: Identify what to mock
The external API call (e.g., requests.get) should be mocked to avoid real network calls.
Step 2: Set mock return JSON data
Set the mock's return_value.json.return_value to the desired JSON dict to simulate API response.
Final Answer:
Use patch on the external call, set return_value.json.return_value = {"success": true} -> Option B
Quick Check:
Mock external call's json() method = Use patch on the external call, set return_value.json.return_value = {"success": true} [OK]
Hint: Mock return_value.json.return_value for JSON responses [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Mocking Flask route instead of external call
Calling real API in tests
Changing app config instead of mocking
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.