Wildcard and prefix queries in Elasticsearch - Time & Space Complexity
When searching text in Elasticsearch, wildcard and prefix queries help find words that start or match patterns.
We want to know how the search time changes as the data grows.
Analyze the time complexity of this Elasticsearch query using a wildcard and prefix search.
GET /products/_search
{
"query": {
"bool": {
"should": [
{ "wildcard": { "name": "sams*" } },
{ "prefix": { "name": "sam" } }
]
}
}
}
This query looks for product names starting with "sams" or "sam" using wildcard and prefix patterns.
Look at what repeats when Elasticsearch runs this query.
- Primary operation: Scanning terms in the index that match the wildcard or prefix pattern.
- How many times: It checks many terms depending on how many start with "sam" or match "sams*".
As the number of indexed terms grows, the search checks more terms that match the pattern.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | Few terms to check, fast search |
| 100 | More terms starting with "sam", more checks |
| 1000 | Many terms to scan, search takes longer |
Pattern observation: The time grows roughly with how many terms match the prefix or wildcard pattern.
Time Complexity: O(m)
This means the search time grows in proportion to the number of matching terms, not the total data size.
[X] Wrong: "Wildcard and prefix queries always scan the entire index."
[OK] Correct: They only scan terms that could match the pattern, so the cost depends on matching terms, not all data.
Understanding how search time grows with pattern matching helps you explain query performance clearly and confidently.
What if we changed the wildcard pattern from "sams*" to "*sam"? How would the time complexity change?
Practice
* symbol do in Elasticsearch?Solution
Step 1: Understand the wildcard symbol
The**symbol in wildcard queries matches zero or more characters in any position of the term.Step 2: Compare with other options
Exact match requires no wildcard, prefix queries use a different query type, and suffix matching is not directly done by*alone.Final Answer:
Matches any sequence of characters in the search term -> Option DQuick Check:
wildcard * = match any chars [OK]
- Confusing wildcard * with prefix query
- Thinking * matches only one character
- Assuming wildcard matches exact terms only
Solution
Step 1: Identify prefix query syntax
Prefix queries use theprefixkeyword with the field and the prefix string.Step 2: Check other options
Wildcard queries usewildcard, match and term queries do not support prefix syntax with asterisk.Final Answer:
{ "prefix": { "field_name": "pre" } } -> Option AQuick Check:
prefix query uses "prefix" keyword [OK]
- Using wildcard syntax for prefix query
- Using match query with asterisk
- Confusing term query with prefix query
{ "query": { "wildcard": { "name": "jo?n*" } } }Assuming documents have names: "john", "joan", "jonas", "joanathan", "jo".
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the wildcard pattern "jo?n*"
The pattern means: 'jo' followed by any single character (due to '?'), then 'n', then any characters (due to '*').Step 2: Check each name against the pattern
"john" matches ('h' replaces '?'), "joan" matches ('a' replaces '?'), "joanathan" matches ('a' replaces '?'). "jonas" does not match ('n' replaces '?' but next 'a' ≠ 'n'). "jo" is too short to match.Final Answer:
["john", "joan", "joanathan"] -> Option CQuick Check:
wildcard ? = one char, * = any chars [OK]
- Assuming ? matches zero characters
- Including too short strings like "jo"
- Confusing wildcard with prefix query
{ "query": { "prefix": { "title": "prog*" } } }What is the error?
Solution
Step 1: Understand prefix query syntax
Prefix queries expect a string prefix without wildcards like '*'. The asterisk is not needed and causes no matches.Step 2: Check other options
Field name is assumed valid, wildcard keyword is different query type, and match query is unrelated to prefix syntax.Final Answer:
Prefix query should not include the asterisk (*) -> Option BQuick Check:
Prefix query uses plain prefix string, no * [OK]
- Including * in prefix query string
- Confusing prefix with wildcard query
- Using match query instead of prefix
{ "query": { "wildcard": { "username": "alex*" } } } or { "query": { "prefix": { "username": "alex" } } }Solution
Step 1: Compare prefix and wildcard queries for this case
Both queries match terms starting with "alex" and any characters after. Wildcard uses "alex*", prefix uses "alex" without *.Step 2: Consider performance and usage
Prefix queries are optimized and faster for this use case. Wildcard queries are slower and more flexible but unnecessary here.Final Answer:
Prefix query is better because it is faster and matches all starting with "alex" -> Option AQuick Check:
Prefix query faster for starts-with matching [OK]
- Using wildcard when prefix is enough
- Adding * in prefix query string
- Thinking wildcard matches exact only
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
