Many-to-many with GSI overloading in DynamoDB - Interactive Code Practice

Practice - 5 Tasks

1fill in blank

easy

Complete the code to define the partition key for the main table.

DynamoDB

PartitionKey: [1]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A"SK"

B"PK"

C"GSI1PK"

D"GSI1SK"

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using the sort key attribute instead of the partition key.

Confusing GSI keys with main table keys.

The main table's partition key is usually named "PK" to represent the primary key.

2fill in blank

medium

Complete the code to set the sort key for the GSI to overload multiple entity types.

DynamoDB

GSI1SortKey: [1]

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A"SK"

B"PK"

C"GSI1SK"

D"EntityType"

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using the main table's sort key instead of the GSI sort key.

Using the partition key as the sort key.

The GSI sort key is named "GSI1SK" to allow overloading with different entity types.

3fill in blank

hard

Fix the error in the query to fetch all related items by GSI partition key.

DynamoDB

KeyConditionExpression: "GSI1PK = [1]"

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A"pkValue"

BpkValue

C:GSI1PK

D:pkValue

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using the variable name without colon.

Using the attribute name instead of the value placeholder.

In DynamoDB queries, attribute values must be referenced with placeholders starting with a colon, like ':pkValue'.

4fill in blank

hard

Fill both blanks to complete the expression that filters items by entity type and status.

DynamoDB

FilterExpression: "EntityType = [1] AND Status = [2]"

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A:entityType

B:status

C"Active"

D"User"

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using raw strings instead of placeholders.

Mixing up entity type and status values.

The filter expression uses placeholders for values. Here, 'EntityType' equals ':entityType' which is 'User', and 'Status' equals ':status' which is 'Active'.

5fill in blank

hard

Fill all three blanks to build a dictionary for expression attribute values in a DynamoDB query.

DynamoDB

ExpressionAttributeValues: [1]: "User", [2]: "Active", [3]: "12345"

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A":entityType"

B":status"

C":userId"

D":id"

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using keys without colon prefix.

Using incorrect placeholder names.

The expression attribute values map placeholders to actual values. Here, ':entityType' maps to 'User', ':status' to 'Active', and ':userId' to '12345'.

Practice

1. What is the main advantage of using a Global Secondary Index (GSI) for many-to-many relationships in DynamoDB?

easy

A. It duplicates data across multiple tables for backup.

B. It allows querying related items from both sides without extra tables.

C. It automatically creates foreign key constraints.

D. It enforces strict schema validation on items.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand GSI role in many-to-many

   A GSI lets you query items using alternate keys, enabling access from either side of a relationship.

2. Step 2: Compare with other methods

   Unlike extra tables or joins, GSI overloading stores relationships in one table, simplifying queries.

3. Final Answer:

   It allows querying related items from both sides without extra tables. -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   GSI enables two-way queries without extra tables [OK]

Hint: GSI lets you query both sides in one table [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking GSI enforces foreign keys
• Assuming GSI duplicates data in multiple tables
• Believing GSI validates schema strictly

2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a GSI for overloading many-to-many relationships in DynamoDB?

easy

A. { "IndexName": "GSI1", "KeySchema": [{"AttributeName": "UserId", "KeyType": "HASH"}], "Projection": {"ProjectionType": "KEYS_ONLY"}}

B. { "IndexName": "GSI1", "KeySchema": [{"AttributeName": "PK", "KeyType": "HASH"}, {"AttributeName": "SK", "KeyType": "RANGE"}], "Projection": {"ProjectionType": "ALL"}}

C. { "IndexName": "GSI1", "KeySchema": [{"AttributeName": "SK", "KeyType": "HASH"}, {"AttributeName": "PK", "KeyType": "RANGE"}], "Projection": {"ProjectionType": "INCLUDE", "NonKeyAttributes": ["Name"]}}

D. { "IndexName": "GSI1", "KeySchema": [{"AttributeName": "ID", "KeyType": "HASH"}], "Projection": {"ProjectionType": "ALL"}}

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify correct GSI key schema for many-to-many

   The GSI should use SK as HASH and PK as RANGE keys to support querying from both sides.

2. Step 2: Check projection type

   Projection INCLUDE ensures required attributes like Name are available in the index for queries.

3. Final Answer:

   Definition with SK as HASH, PK as RANGE, and Projection INCLUDE -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   GSI keys SK HASH + PK RANGE + Projection INCLUDE [OK]

Hint: GSI keys: SK as HASH, PK as RANGE, Projection INCLUDE [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using only HASH key without RANGE
• Swapping PK and SK roles incorrectly
• Choosing Projection KEYS_ONLY when full data needed

3. Given a DynamoDB table with items storing user-group relationships using GSI overloading, what will this query return?

Query({
  IndexName: 'GSI1',
  KeyConditionExpression: 'SK = :groupId',
  ExpressionAttributeValues: { ':groupId': 'GROUP#123' }
})

medium

A. All users belonging to group with ID 'GROUP#123'.

B. All groups that user 'GROUP#123' belongs to.

C. All items with primary key 'GROUP#123'.

D. An error because PK cannot be used in GSI queries.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand GSI key usage in query

   The query uses GSI1 with SK = 'GROUP#123', so it fetches items where GSI partition key (SK attribute) equals this group ID.

2. Step 2: Interpret the meaning of PK in many-to-many

   SK in GSI represents the group, PK (range) the users, so we get users in that group.

3. Final Answer:

   All users belonging to group with ID 'GROUP#123'. -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Query by GSI SK = group ID returns users in group [OK]

Hint: GSI SK query with group ID returns users in that group [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing group ID with user ID in query
• Expecting groups for a user instead of users for a group
• Thinking PK cannot be queried in GSI

4. You wrote this query to get all groups for a user but it returns no results:

Query({
  IndexName: 'GSI1',
  KeyConditionExpression: 'SK = :userId',
  ExpressionAttributeValues: { ':userId': 'USER#456' }
})

What is the likely mistake?

medium

A. The GSI's HASH key is actually SK, not PK, for user queries.

B. The query syntax is invalid; KeyConditionExpression must use SK.

C. ExpressionAttributeValues should use ':user' instead of ':userId'.

D. You must use the main table's primary key, not GSI keys.

Solution

1. Step 1: Recall GSI key overloading pattern

   In many-to-many GSI overloading, use main table (PK=userId as HASH) for user-to-groups queries, GSI (SK=groupId as HASH) for group-to-users.

2. Step 2: Check query KeyConditionExpression

   The query uses GSI with SK = userId, but SK holds group IDs, so no results; use main table instead.

3. Final Answer:

   You must use the main table's primary key, not GSI keys. -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Main table PK=user for user queries [OK]

Hint: Main table for user->groups, GSI for group->users [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong GSI key attribute in query
• Confusing main table keys with GSI keys
• Incorrect ExpressionAttributeValues naming

5. You want to store many-to-many relationships between authors and books in one DynamoDB table using GSI overloading. Which design correctly supports querying all books by an author and all authors of a book efficiently?

hard

A. Use PK = 'AUTHOR#<authorId>', SK = 'BOOK#<bookId>' for author-to-book items, and GSI with PK = SK, SK = PK to query from book side.

B. Create separate tables for authors and books, then join them in application code.

C. Use PK = 'BOOK#<bookId>', SK = 'AUTHOR#<authorId>' only, and no GSI.

D. Store all relationships as JSON arrays inside author items without GSI.

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand many-to-many with GSI overloading

   Store relationships with PK as author and SK as book to query books by author.

2. Step 2: Use GSI to invert keys for reverse query

   Define GSI with PK = SK and SK = PK to query authors by book efficiently.

3. Step 3: Evaluate other options

   Separate tables or JSON arrays do not provide efficient two-way queries without extra work.

4. Final Answer:

   Use PK = 'AUTHOR#<authorId>', SK = 'BOOK#<bookId>' and GSI with PK = SK, SK = PK. -> Option A

5. Quick Check:

   Overload GSI keys to invert PK and SK for two-way queries [OK]

Hint: Invert PK and SK in GSI for reverse many-to-many queries [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not using GSI for reverse lookup
• Storing relationships only one way
• Using separate tables instead of one with GSI