Bird
Raised Fist0
DynamoDBquery~10 mins

Local Secondary Index (LSI) concept in DynamoDB - Interactive Code Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to define a Local Secondary Index (LSI) with a sort key.

DynamoDB
LocalSecondaryIndexes: [{
  IndexName: 'LSI1',
  KeySchema: [
    { AttributeName: 'UserId', KeyType: 'HASH' },
    { AttributeName: [1], KeyType: 'RANGE' }
  ],
  Projection: { ProjectionType: 'ALL' }
}]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AEmail
BUserId
CTimestamp
DStatus
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the same attribute 'UserId' for both partition and sort key.
Choosing an attribute not defined in the table schema.
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the query to use the LSI by specifying the index name.

DynamoDB
const params = {
  TableName: 'Orders',
  IndexName: [1],
  KeyConditionExpression: 'UserId = :uid and Timestamp > :ts',
  ExpressionAttributeValues: {
    ':uid': 'user123',
    ':ts': 1609459200
  }
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ADefaultIndex
BLSI1
CGSI1
DPrimaryIndex
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using the primary index name or a Global Secondary Index name instead of the LSI name.
Omitting the 'IndexName' parameter.
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in the LSI definition by choosing the correct attribute type for the sort key.

DynamoDB
AttributeDefinitions: [
  { AttributeName: 'UserId', AttributeType: 'S' },
  { AttributeName: 'Timestamp', AttributeType: [1] }
],
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AN
BB
CS
DBOOL
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Setting 'Timestamp' as a string when it is stored as a number.
Using unsupported attribute types like 'BOOL' for keys.
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to complete the LSI query with correct KeyConditionExpression and attribute values.

DynamoDB
const params = {
  TableName: 'Orders',
  IndexName: 'LSI1',
  KeyConditionExpression: 'UserId = :uid and [1] > :ts',
  ExpressionAttributeValues: {
    ':uid': 'user123',
    [2]: 1609459200
  }
};
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ATimestamp
B:ts
C:timestamp
D:time
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using different placeholder names in the expression and values.
Using attribute names instead of placeholders in ExpressionAttributeValues.
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to define an LSI with correct attribute definitions, key schema, and projection type.

DynamoDB
AttributeDefinitions: [
  { AttributeName: 'UserId', AttributeType: 'S' },
  { AttributeName: [1], AttributeType: 'N' }
],
LocalSecondaryIndexes: [{
  IndexName: 'LSI1',
  KeySchema: [
    { AttributeName: 'UserId', KeyType: 'HASH' },
    { AttributeName: [2], KeyType: 'RANGE' }
  ],
  Projection: { ProjectionType: [3] }
}]
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
ATimestamp
CALL
DUserId
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Mismatch between attribute definitions and key schema attribute names.
Using incorrect projection types.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of a Local Secondary Index (LSI) in DynamoDB?
easy
A. To store data in a separate table
B. To allow querying data with the same partition key but different sort keys
C. To create a new partition key for faster queries
D. To backup data automatically

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand LSI functionality

    LSI lets you query items with the same partition key but sorted by an alternate sort key.
  2. Step 2: Compare options

    Only To allow querying data with the same partition key but different sort keys correctly describes this feature; others describe unrelated features.
  3. Final Answer:

    To allow querying data with the same partition key but different sort keys -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    LSI = alternate sort key with same partition key [OK]
Hint: LSI changes sort key, not partition key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking LSI creates new partition keys
  • Confusing LSI with Global Secondary Index
  • Believing LSI stores data separately
2. Which of the following is the correct way to define a Local Secondary Index (LSI) when creating a DynamoDB table?
easy
A. Define the LSI with a different partition key than the main table
B. Define the LSI with a new partition key and no sort key
C. Define the LSI after the table is created using updateTable API
D. Define the LSI with the same partition key but a different sort key

Solution

  1. Step 1: Recall LSI definition rules

    LSIs must use the same partition key as the main table but can have a different sort key.
  2. Step 2: Check options

    Only Define the LSI with the same partition key but a different sort key matches this rule; others violate partition key or timing constraints.
  3. Final Answer:

    Define the LSI with the same partition key but a different sort key -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    LSI = same partition key + different sort key [OK]
Hint: LSI shares partition key, differs in sort key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Trying to create LSI after table creation
  • Using different partition keys for LSI
  • Omitting sort key in LSI definition
3. Given a DynamoDB table with partition key UserID and sort key Timestamp, and an LSI with sort key OrderStatus, what will the following query return?

Query: KeyConditionExpression = UserID = '123' AND OrderStatus = 'Pending'
medium
A. All items with OrderStatus 'Pending' regardless of UserID
B. All items with UserID '123' sorted by Timestamp
C. All items with UserID '123' and OrderStatus 'Pending' sorted by OrderStatus
D. Syntax error because OrderStatus cannot be used in KeyConditionExpression

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand query with LSI

    Query on LSI uses same partition key but different sort key (OrderStatus). The query filters UserID = '123' and OrderStatus = 'Pending'.
  2. Step 2: Analyze query result

    It returns items with UserID '123' and OrderStatus 'Pending', sorted by OrderStatus.
  3. Final Answer:

    All items with UserID '123' and OrderStatus 'Pending' sorted by OrderStatus -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Query on LSI filters by partition and LSI sort key [OK]
Hint: LSI query filters by partition key + LSI sort key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming LSI changes partition key
  • Thinking query returns all items with OrderStatus only
  • Believing syntax error occurs using LSI sort key
4. You created a DynamoDB table with an LSI but your query using the LSI's sort key returns no results even though matching items exist. What is the most likely cause?
medium
A. The partition key value in the query is incorrect
B. You used the LSI's partition key instead of the main table's partition key
C. The LSI's sort key attribute is missing in some items
D. The LSI was not defined at table creation time

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check LSI query requirements

    Queries on LSI require the correct partition key value; wrong partition key returns no results.
  2. Step 2: Evaluate options

    The partition key value in the query is incorrect explains no results due to incorrect partition key; other options are less likely or invalid.
  3. Final Answer:

    The partition key value in the query is incorrect -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Correct partition key needed for LSI query [OK]
Hint: Always verify partition key value in LSI queries [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Trying to add LSI after table creation
  • Ignoring missing sort key attributes
  • Confusing LSI partition key with main table partition key
5. You have a DynamoDB table with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderDate. You want to query all orders for a customer sorted by OrderStatus instead of OrderDate. How should you design the Local Secondary Index (LSI) to achieve this?
hard
A. Create an LSI with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderStatus defined at table creation
B. Create an LSI with partition key OrderStatus and sort key OrderDate after table creation
C. Create a Global Secondary Index (GSI) with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderStatus
D. Add OrderStatus as a new partition key in the main table

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand LSI design rules

    LSI must use the same partition key as the main table but can have a different sort key.
  2. Step 2: Apply to problem

    To sort by OrderStatus for the same CustomerID, create an LSI with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderStatus at table creation.
  3. Step 3: Eliminate wrong options

    Create an LSI with partition key OrderStatus and sort key OrderDate after table creation is invalid because LSI cannot be created after table creation; Create a Global Secondary Index (GSI) with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderStatus is about GSI, not LSI; Add OrderStatus as a new partition key in the main table changes partition key, which is not allowed.
  4. Final Answer:

    Create an LSI with partition key CustomerID and sort key OrderStatus defined at table creation -> Option A
  5. Quick Check:

    LSI = same partition key + new sort key at creation [OK]
Hint: LSI must be defined at table creation with same partition key [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Trying to create LSI after table creation
  • Confusing LSI with GSI
  • Changing partition key in LSI
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard