Which situation is the best reason to use a Scan operation in DynamoDB?
Think about when scanning the whole table is not costly or inefficient.
Scan reads every item in the table, so it is acceptable only when the table is small and you need all data without filtering by keys.
What is the main reason to avoid using Scan on large DynamoDB tables?
Think about the cost and speed of reading many items.
Scan reads every item, which can be slow and expensive on large tables because it consumes many read capacity units and increases latency.
Given a DynamoDB table with 3 items, what will be the output of a Scan operation without filters?
Table items: 1. {"id": "1", "name": "Alice"} 2. {"id": "2", "name": "Bob"} 3. {"id": "3", "name": "Carol"} Scan operation: scan the whole table without any filter.
Scan returns all items if no filter is applied.
Scan reads all items in the table and returns them as a list when no filter is used.
You have a DynamoDB table expected to grow very large. You need to occasionally retrieve all items for a report. What is the best design choice to allow efficient Scan usage?
Think about how to keep Scan efficient by controlling table size.
Archiving old data keeps the table small, making Scan efficient and acceptable for occasional full reads.
You run a Scan on a large DynamoDB table and notice very high latency and throttling. Which option explains the cause?
Scan operation without any filter or pagination on a table with millions of items.
Consider how Scan works internally on large tables.
Scan reads every item in the table, so on large tables it consumes many read capacity units at once, causing throttling and high latency.