BST Inorder Predecessor in DSA Typescript - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how long it takes to find the inorder predecessor in a Binary Search Tree (BST).
The question is: how does the time grow as the tree gets bigger?
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
function inorderPredecessor(root: TreeNode | null, key: number): TreeNode | null {
let predecessor: TreeNode | null = null;
let current = root;
while (current) {
if (key <= current.val) {
current = current.left;
} else {
predecessor = current;
current = current.right;
}
}
return predecessor;
}
This code finds the inorder predecessor of a given key in a BST by walking down the tree.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: The while loop that moves down the tree nodes.
- How many times: At most once per level of the tree, until it reaches a leaf or finds the predecessor.
As the tree grows taller, the number of steps to find the predecessor grows roughly with the tree height.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | About 3 to 4 steps (tree height) |
| 100 | About 6 to 7 steps |
| 1000 | About 9 to 10 steps |
Pattern observation: The steps grow slowly as the tree height grows, not directly with total nodes.
Time Complexity: O(h)
This means the time depends on the height of the tree, which is the number of levels from root to leaf.
[X] Wrong: "Finding the inorder predecessor always takes time proportional to the total number of nodes."
[OK] Correct: The search only follows a path down the tree, not all nodes, so it depends on tree height, not total nodes.
Understanding how tree height affects search time helps you explain and optimize tree operations clearly in interviews.
What if the BST is balanced versus completely unbalanced? How would the time complexity change?
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand inorder traversal in BST
Inorder traversal visits nodes in ascending order of their values.Step 2: Define inorder predecessor
The inorder predecessor of a node is the node visited just before it in inorder traversal, which means it has the largest value smaller than the given node.Final Answer:
The node with the largest value smaller than the given node -> Option BQuick Check:
Inorder predecessor = largest smaller value [OK]
- Confusing predecessor with successor
- Thinking predecessor is always left child
- Assuming predecessor is the parent node
Solution
Step 1: Identify required inputs and outputs
To find the inorder predecessor, we need the BST root and the target node, and we return the predecessor node or null if none.Step 2: Match function signature
function findInorderPredecessor(root: TreeNode, node: TreeNode): TreeNode | null matches this: it takes root and node, returns TreeNode or null.Final Answer:
function findInorderPredecessor(root: TreeNode, node: TreeNode): TreeNode | null -> Option CQuick Check:
Correct inputs and output type [OK]
- Missing root parameter
- Returning wrong type like number or boolean
- No parameters or void return type
20
/ \
10 30
\
15
Solution
Step 1: Perform inorder traversal around node 15
Inorder traversal visits nodes in order: 10, 15, 20, 30.Step 2: Find node before 15 in traversal
The node before 15 is 10, so 10 is the inorder predecessor.Final Answer:
10 -> Option AQuick Check:
Predecessor of 15 = 10 [OK]
- Choosing the node itself as predecessor
- Choosing parent node incorrectly
- Confusing predecessor with successor
function inorderPredecessor(root: TreeNode | null, node: TreeNode): TreeNode | null {
let predecessor: TreeNode | null = null;
while (root) {
if (node.val <= root.val) {
root = root.left;
} else {
predecessor = root;
root = root.right;
}
}
return predecessor;
}
What is the bug in this code?Solution
Step 1: Understand inorder predecessor logic
If node has a left subtree, predecessor is the rightmost node in that subtree, which this code does not check.Step 2: Analyze code behavior
The code only moves down from root to find predecessor by comparing values, missing the left subtree check for node.Final Answer:
It does not handle the case when node has a left subtree -> Option AQuick Check:
Left subtree check missing for predecessor [OK]
- Ignoring left subtree of node
- Assuming predecessor is always ancestor
- Confusing predecessor with successor logic
40
/ \
20 60
/ \ / \
10 30 50 70
/
25
Which steps correctly find the inorder predecessor of 25?Solution
Step 1: Check left subtree of node 25
Node 25 has no left child, so no predecessor in left subtree.Step 2: Move up to ancestors to find predecessor
Ancestor nodes smaller than 25 are candidates; 20 is the closest smaller ancestor.Final Answer:
Check left subtree of 25 (none), then move up to ancestors; predecessor is 20 -> Option DQuick Check:
Predecessor found by ancestor smaller than node [OK]
- Choosing successor instead of predecessor
- Ignoring ancestors when left subtree is empty
- Picking wrong ancestor value
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
