Sort Colors Two Pointer Dutch Flag in DSA Rust - Interactive Practice

Practice - 5 Tasks

1fill in blank

easy

Complete the code to swap elements at two indices in the vector.

DSA Rust

nums.swap([1], right);

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Aleft

Bright

C0

Di

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Swapping with 'right' instead of 'left' swaps wrong elements.

Using an index variable not defined in this scope.

We swap the element at 'left' with the element at 'right' to move 2s to the end.

2fill in blank

medium

Complete the code to decrease the 'right' pointer after swapping a 2.

DSA Rust

right [1] 1;

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A-=

B+=

C*=

D/=

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Increasing 'right' causes out-of-bound errors.

Using multiplication or division operators instead of subtraction.

We decrease 'right' by 1 to move the pointer leftwards after placing a 2.

3fill in blank

hard

Fix the error in the loop condition to continue while 'left' is less than or equal to 'right'.

DSA Rust

while left [1] right {

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

A>

B<

C>=

D<=

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Using '<' misses processing when pointers meet.

Using '>' or '>=' causes the loop to never run.

The loop runs while 'left' is less than or equal to 'right' to cover all elements.

4fill in blank

hard

Fill both blanks to correctly handle the case when nums[left] == 0.

DSA Rust

if nums[left] == 0 {
    nums.swap([1], left);
    [2] += 1;
    left += 1;
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Aleft

Bright

Ci

Dcount

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Swapping with 'right' here is incorrect.

Incrementing a variable other than 'left' causes logic errors.

We swap nums[left] with nums[left] (which is itself) and increment 'left' pointer.

5fill in blank

hard

Fill all three blanks to correctly handle the case when nums[left] == 2.

DSA Rust

if nums[left] == 2 {
    nums.swap(left, [1]);
    [2] -= 1;
    // Do not increment left here
}

Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'

Aleft

Bright

Attempts:

3 left

💡 Hint

Common Mistakes

Incrementing 'left' after swapping 2 causes skipping elements.

Swapping with 'left' instead of 'right' is incorrect.

We swap nums[left] with nums[right], then decrement 'right'. We do not increment 'left' here.

Practice

1. What is the main goal of the Sort Colors Two Pointer Dutch Flag algorithm?

easy

A. To sort an array containing only 0s, 1s, and 2s in a single pass

B. To sort any array of integers in ascending order

C. To find the maximum value in an array

D. To reverse the elements of an array

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem context

   The algorithm is designed specifically for arrays with only three distinct values: 0, 1, and 2.

2. Step 2: Identify the sorting goal

   The goal is to rearrange the array so that all 0s come first, then all 1s, and finally all 2s, in one pass without extra space.

3. Final Answer:

   To sort an array containing only 0s, 1s, and 2s in a single pass -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Sort Colors = Sort 0,1,2 in one pass [OK]

Hint: Remember: Dutch Flag sorts 0,1,2 in one pass [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking it sorts any integer array
• Confusing it with general sorting algorithms
• Assuming it reverses the array

2. Which of the following Rust code snippets correctly declares the pointers used in the Dutch Flag algorithm?

easy

A. let mut low = 0; let mut mid = 0; let mut high = nums.len() - 1;

B. let low = 0; let mid = 0; let high = nums.len();

C. let mut low = 1; let mut mid = 1; let mut high = nums.len() - 1;

D. let mut low = 0; let mut mid = 1; let mut high = nums.len();

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify pointer initialization

   In the Dutch Flag algorithm, low and mid start at 0, and high starts at the last index (len() - 1).

2. Step 2: Check mutability and bounds

   All pointers must be mutable to move during sorting, and high must be len() - 1 to avoid out-of-bounds errors.

3. Final Answer:

   let mut low = 0; let mut mid = 0; let mut high = nums.len() - 1; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Correct pointer setup = let mut low = 0; let mut mid = 0; let mut high = nums.len() - 1; [OK]

Hint: Pointers start at 0 except high at last index [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Setting high to nums.len() causing out-of-bounds
• Not using mutable variables
• Starting pointers at wrong indices

3. What will be the output of the following Rust code after applying the Dutch Flag algorithm?

let mut nums = vec![2, 0, 2, 1, 1, 0];
let mut low = 0;
let mut mid = 0;
let mut high = nums.len() - 1;

while mid <= high {
    match nums[mid] {
        0 => {
            nums.swap(low, mid);
            low += 1;
            mid += 1;
        },
        1 => {
            mid += 1;
        },
        2 => {
            nums.swap(mid, high);
            if high == 0 { break; }
            high -= 1;
        },
        _ => {}
    }
}
println!("{:?}", nums);

medium

A. [0, 1, 0, 1, 2, 2]

B. [2, 2, 1, 1, 0, 0]

C. [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2]

D. [1, 0, 2, 0, 1, 2]

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace initial swaps and pointer moves

   Starting with nums = [2,0,2,1,1,0], the algorithm swaps 2 at mid with 0 at high, then moves pointers accordingly.

2. Step 2: Continue until mid passes high

   After all swaps and increments, the array becomes sorted as [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2].

3. Final Answer:

   [0, 0, 1, 1, 2, 2] -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted 0,1,2 array = [0,0,1,1,2,2] [OK]

Hint: Swap 0s left, 2s right, 1s stay middle [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not updating pointers correctly after swap
• Swapping with wrong indices
• Stopping loop too early

4. Identify the bug in this Rust code snippet implementing the Dutch Flag algorithm:

let mut nums = vec![2, 0, 1];
let mut low = 0;
let mut mid = 0;
let mut high = nums.len();

while mid <= high {
    match nums[mid] {
        0 => {
            nums.swap(low, mid);
            low += 1;
            mid += 1;
        },
        1 => {
            mid += 1;
        },
        2 => {
            nums.swap(mid, high);
            high -= 1;
        },
        _ => {}
    }
}

medium

A. The match statement is missing a case for 3

B. mid pointer is not incremented after swapping 2

C. low pointer is incremented incorrectly

D. high is initialized to nums.len(), causing out-of-bounds access

Solution

1. Step 1: Check pointer initialization

   high is set to nums.len(), which is one past the last valid index, causing out-of-bounds when accessing nums[high].

2. Step 2: Understand valid index range

   Valid indices are 0 to nums.len() - 1, so high should be initialized to nums.len() - 1.

3. Final Answer:

   high is initialized to nums.len(), causing out-of-bounds access -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   high must be last index, not length [OK]

Hint: high = length - 1 to avoid out-of-bounds [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using length instead of last index for high
• Not incrementing mid after swapping 2
• Ignoring pointer bounds

5. Given an array nums = [1, 2, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1], how many swaps will the Dutch Flag algorithm perform to sort it?

hard

A. 3

B. 4

C. 5

D. 6

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace swaps during sorting

   Initial array: [1, 2, 0, 1, 2, 0, 1]. Swaps occur when 0 or 2 is found at mid.

2. Step 2: Count swaps step-by-step

   Swaps: - Swap 0 at index 2 with 1 at low (index 0) -> 1 swap - Swap 2 at index 1 with 1 at high (index 6) -> 1 swap - Swap 0 at index 5 with 1 at low (index 1) -> 1 swap - Swap 2 at index 1 with 1 at high (index 5) -> 1 swap Total swaps = 4.

3. Final Answer:

   4 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Count swaps for 0 and 2 moves = 4 [OK]

Hint: Count swaps only when swapping 0 or 2 [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Counting pointer moves as swaps
• Missing swaps when 2 is swapped
• Assuming swaps equal array length