📖 Scenario: You have two sorted lists of numbers representing two shelves of books arranged by height. You want to combine these two shelves into one sorted arrangement without using extra space, so you can organize the books efficiently.
🎯 Goal: Build a Rust program that merges two sorted arrays into one sorted sequence without using any extra space (no new arrays). The final state should have the smallest numbers in the first array and the larger numbers in the second array.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create two sorted arrays named arr1 and arr2 with exact values
Create a variable n for the length of arr1 and m for the length of arr2
Implement the merge logic without using extra space or additional arrays
Print the final state of arr1 and arr2 after merging
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Merging sorted data streams or lists efficiently without extra memory is useful in embedded systems or memory-limited environments.
💼 Career
Understanding in-place merging is important for software engineers working on performance-critical applications, databases, or systems programming.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create two sorted arrays
Create two sorted arrays called arr1 and arr2 with these exact values: arr1 = [1, 5, 9, 10, 15, 20] and arr2 = [2, 3, 8, 13].
DSA Rust
Hint
Use let mut arr1 = vec![...] and let mut arr2 = vec![...] to create the arrays.
2
Create length variables for both arrays
Create two variables called n and m that store the lengths of arr1 and arr2 respectively.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use arr1.len() and arr2.len() to get lengths.
3
Implement merge logic without extra space
Write a nested for loop where the outer loop uses i from 0 to n - 1 and the inner loop uses j from 0 to m - 1. Inside the inner loop, if arr1[i] is greater than arr2[j], swap these two elements. Then sort arr2 after each swap using arr2.sort().
DSA Rust
Hint
Use two loops and swap elements if arr1[i] is bigger than arr2[j]. Then sort arr2 to keep it ordered.
4
Print the merged arrays
Print the final state of arr1 and arr2 using println!("arr1: {:?}", arr1) and println!("arr2: {:?}", arr2).
DSA Rust
Hint
Use println!("arr1: {:?}", arr1) and println!("arr2: {:?}", arr2) to show the arrays.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal when merging two sorted arrays without extra space?
easy
A. Sort each array separately using extra space
B. Combine both arrays into one sorted sequence without using extra memory
C. Copy elements from one array to another without sorting
D. Create a new array to hold merged elements
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem requirement
The problem asks to merge two sorted arrays into a sorted sequence without using extra space, meaning no new arrays can be created.
Step 2: Identify the correct approach
We must rearrange elements within the given arrays to maintain sorted order combined, without additional memory.
Final Answer:
Combine both arrays into one sorted sequence without using extra memory -> Option B
Quick Check:
Merge without extra space = Combine in place [OK]
Hint: Merge by swapping elements, no new arrays needed [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Trying to create a new array for merged result
Sorting arrays separately without merging
Ignoring the no extra space constraint
2. Which Rust syntax correctly declares two mutable sorted arrays for merging without extra space?
easy
A. let mut arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; let mut arr2 = [2, 4, 6];
B. let arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; let arr2 = [2, 4, 6];
C. mut arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; mut arr2 = [2, 4, 6];
D. let mut arr1 = (1, 3, 5); let mut arr2 = (2, 4, 6);
In Rust, arrays are declared with let mut for mutability and square brackets for arrays.
Step 2: Check each option
let mut arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; let mut arr2 = [2, 4, 6]; uses let mut with arrays correctly. let arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; let arr2 = [2, 4, 6]; misses mut keyword. mut arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; mut arr2 = [2, 4, 6]; misses let keyword. let mut arr1 = (1, 3, 5); let mut arr2 = (2, 4, 6); uses tuples, not arrays.
Final Answer:
let mut arr1 = [1, 3, 5]; let mut arr2 = [2, 4, 6]; -> Option A
Quick Check:
Mutable arrays use let mut and [] [OK]
Hint: Use let mut and square brackets for mutable arrays [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Forgetting mut keyword for mutable arrays
Using tuples instead of arrays
Missing let keyword
3. What will be the content of arrays after merging arr1 = [1, 4, 7] and arr2 = [2, 5, 6] without extra space using the gap method?
medium
A. ]7 ,6 ,5[ = 2rra ,]4 ,2 ,1[ = 1rra
B. arr1 = [1, 4, 5], arr2 = [2, 6, 7]
C. rr1 = [1, 2, 4], arr2 = [5, 6, 7]
D. arr1 = [1, 2, 4], arr2 = [5, 6, 7]
Solution
Step 1: Apply gap method to merge arrays
Start with gap = ceil((3+3)/2) = 3. Compare and swap elements at gap distance across arrays until gap reduces to 0.
Step 2: Final arrays after merging
After applying gap method, arr1 becomes [1, 2, 4] and arr2 becomes [5, 6, 7], maintaining sorted order without extra space.
Final Answer:
arr1 = [1, 2, 4], arr2 = [5, 6, 7] -> Option D
Quick Check:
Gap method merges arrays in place [OK]
Hint: Use gap method to compare and swap elements at decreasing gaps [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not reducing gap correctly
Swapping elements incorrectly across arrays
Confusing array indices during merge
4. Identify the error in this Rust code snippet for merging two sorted arrays without extra space:
let mut arr1 = [1, 5, 9];
let mut arr2 = [2, 6, 8];
for i in 0..arr1.len() {
if arr1[i] > arr2[0] {
let temp = arr1[i];
arr1[i] = arr2[0];
arr2[0] = temp;
}
arr2.sort();
}
medium
A. Using let temp causes ownership error in Rust
B. Swapping elements between arr1 and arr2 is not allowed
C. Sorting arr2 inside the loop is inefficient and incorrect
D. The loop range should be arr2.len() instead of arr1.len()
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the loop and sorting inside it
The code sorts arr2 inside the loop for every iteration, which is inefficient and unnecessary.
Step 2: Correct approach for sorting arr2
Sorting arr2 should be done once after all swaps, not inside the loop, to improve performance and correctness.
Final Answer:
Sorting arr2 inside the loop is inefficient and incorrect -> Option C
Quick Check:
Sort arr2 once after loop [OK]
Hint: Sort arr2 once after loop, not inside it [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Sorting arr2 repeatedly inside loop
Confusing loop ranges
Misunderstanding Rust ownership with temp variable
5. Given two sorted arrays arr1 = [1, 3, 5, 7] and arr2 = [0, 2, 6, 8, 9], how can you merge them without extra space so that after merging, arr1 contains the first 4 smallest elements and arr2 contains the remaining elements sorted? Choose the correct final arrays.
hard
A. arr1 = [0, 1, 2, 3], arr2 = [5, 6, 7, 8, 9]
B. arr1 = [1, 2, 3, 5], arr2 = [0, 6, 7, 8, 9]
C. arr1 = [0, 1, 3, 5], arr2 = [2, 6, 7, 8, 9]
D. arr1 = [0, 1, 3, 6], arr2 = [2, 5, 7, 8, 9]
Solution
Step 1: Understand merging without extra space for unequal sizes
We must rearrange elements so arr1 holds smallest 4 elements and arr2 holds the rest, both sorted.
Step 2: Apply gap method or swapping approach
By comparing and swapping elements between arrays and sorting arr2, final arrays become arr1 = [0, 1, 2, 3] and arr2 = [5, 6, 7, 8, 9].