📖 Scenario: Imagine you are working with a system that needs to count how many lights are turned on in a row of switches. Each switch can be either off (0) or on (1). We represent the switches as bits in a number. Your task is to count how many switches are on using a smart method called Brian Kernighan's algorithm.
🎯 Goal: You will write a Rust program that counts the number of set bits (1s) in a given unsigned integer using Brian Kernighan's algorithm. This method efficiently counts bits by turning off the rightmost set bit one by one until the number becomes zero.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a variable called num with the exact value 29u32
Create a variable called count and initialize it to 0
Use a while loop that runs while num is greater than zero
Inside the loop, update num to num & (num - 1) to turn off the rightmost set bit
Increment count by 1 inside the loop
Print the final value of count
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Counting set bits is useful in network masks, permissions, and hardware control where bits represent states or flags.
💼 Career
Understanding bit manipulation and efficient algorithms is important for systems programmers, embedded developers, and performance engineers.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the number variable
Create a variable called num and set it to the unsigned 32-bit integer 29u32.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use let mut num = 29u32; to create a mutable variable named num.
2
Initialize the count variable
Create a variable called count and initialize it to 0 inside the main function after num.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use let mut count = 0; to create a mutable counter variable.
3
Implement Brian Kernighan's loop
Use a while loop that runs while num > 0. Inside the loop, update num to num & (num - 1) and increment count by 1.
DSA Rust
Hint
The loop should run while num is greater than zero. Each time, turn off the rightmost set bit and increase count by one.
4
Print the count of set bits
Print the value of count using println! inside the main function after the loop.
DSA Rust
Hint
Use println!("{}", count); to display the number of set bits.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Brian Kernighan algorithm do when counting set bits in a number?
easy
A. It repeatedly clears the least significant set bit until the number becomes zero
B. It counts the total number of bits in the number
C. It shifts the number right until it becomes zero
D. It converts the number to a string and counts '1' characters
Solution
Step 1: Understand the algorithm's main operation
The Brian Kernighan algorithm works by clearing the least significant set bit in each iteration.
Step 2: Effect of clearing bits
Each time the least significant set bit is cleared, the count of set bits increases by one until the number becomes zero.
Final Answer:
It repeatedly clears the least significant set bit until the number becomes zero -> Option A
Quick Check:
Clearing bits one by one counts set bits [OK]
Hint: Clear least set bit repeatedly to count set bits [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Counting total bits instead of set bits
Using string conversion instead of bit operations
Shifting without checking bits
2. Which of the following Rust code snippets correctly implements the Brian Kernighan algorithm to count set bits?
easy
A. fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 { let mut count = 0; while n > 0 { count += n & 1; n >>= 1; } count }
B. fn count_set_bits(n: u32) -> u32 { n.count_ones() }
C. fn count_set_bits(n: u32) -> u32 { n.trailing_zeros() }
D. fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 { let mut count = 0; while n != 0 { n &= n - 1; count += 1; } count }
Solution
Step 1: Identify the Brian Kernighan algorithm code
fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 { let mut count = 0; while n != 0 { n &= n - 1; count += 1; } count } uses the loop with n &= n - 1 to clear the least significant set bit repeatedly.
Step 2: Verify other options
fn count_set_bits(n: u32) -> u32 { n.count_ones() } uses built-in count_ones(), fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 { let mut count = 0; while n > 0 { count += n & 1; n >>= 1; } count } uses bit shifting, and fn count_set_bits(n: u32) -> u32 { n.trailing_zeros() } uses trailing_zeros(), which are not Brian Kernighan's method.
Final Answer:
fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 { let mut count = 0; while n != 0 { n &= n - 1; count += 1; } count } -> Option D
Quick Check:
n &= n - 1 loop is Brian Kernighan's method [OK]
Hint: Use n &= n - 1 in loop to clear bits [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using built-in functions instead of algorithm
Shifting bits instead of clearing
Using trailing_zeros which counts zeros, not ones
3. What is the output of the following Rust code?
fn main() {
let mut n = 29u32; // binary 11101
let mut count = 0;
while n != 0 {
n &= n - 1;
count += 1;
}
println!("{}", count);
}
medium
A. 3
B. 4
C. 5
D. 6
Solution
Step 1: Convert 29 to binary and count set bits
29 in binary is 11101, which has four set bits (1s).
Step 2: Apply Brian Kernighan algorithm steps
Each iteration clears one set bit until n becomes zero, so count increments 4 times.
Final Answer:
4 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Number of 1s in 11101 = 4 [OK]
Hint: Count 1s in binary representation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Counting total bits instead of set bits
Miscounting binary digits
Confusing zero bits with set bits
4. Identify the error in this Rust implementation of Brian Kernighan's algorithm:
fn count_set_bits(mut n: u32) -> u32 {
let mut count = 0;
while n > 0 {
n = n - 1;
count += 1;
}
count
}
medium
A. It uses n > 0 instead of n != 0 in the loop condition
B. It uses a while loop instead of a for loop
C. It decrements n by 1 instead of clearing the least significant set bit
D. It does not initialize count to zero
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the loop operation on n
The code subtracts 1 from n each time, which does not clear the least significant set bit correctly.
Step 2: Understand Brian Kernighan's method
The correct operation is n &= n - 1 to clear the least significant set bit, not n = n - 1.
Final Answer:
It decrements n by 1 instead of clearing the least significant set bit -> Option C
Quick Check:
Use n &= n - 1 to clear bits, not n = n - 1 [OK]
Hint: Use bitwise AND to clear bits, not subtraction alone [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using subtraction instead of bitwise AND
Wrong loop condition causing infinite loop
Not incrementing count properly
5. Given a list of unsigned integers [7, 8, 15, 23], which Rust code using Brian Kernighan's algorithm correctly returns a vector of their set bit counts?
hard
A. fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| { let mut x = n; let mut c = 0; while x != 0 { x &= x - 1; c += 1; } c }).collect() }
B. fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| n.count_ones()).collect() }
C. fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| n.trailing_zeros()).collect() }
D. fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| n.leading_zeros()).collect() }
Solution
Step 1: Identify Brian Kernighan's algorithm in code
fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| { let mut x = n; let mut c = 0; while x != 0 { x &= x - 1; c += 1; } c }).collect() } uses the loop with x &= x - 1 to count set bits for each number.
Step 2: Check other options
Options B, C, and D use built-in functions not related to Brian Kernighan's algorithm.
Step 3: Confirm output correctness
fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| { let mut x = n; let mut c = 0; while x != 0 { x &= x - 1; c += 1; } c }).collect() } returns a vector with counts of set bits for each number in the list.
Final Answer:
fn count_bits_list(nums: &[u32]) -> Vec<u32> { nums.iter().map(|&n| { let mut x = n; let mut c = 0; while x != 0 { x &= x - 1; c += 1; } c }).collect() } -> Option A
Quick Check:
Loop with x &= x - 1 counts bits per number [OK]
Hint: Map each number with Brian Kernighan loop to count bits [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using built-in count_ones instead of algorithm
Using trailing_zeros or leading_zeros which count zeros
Not collecting results into a vector
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.