What is the main goal of the 'Container With Most Water' problem?
To find two lines in an array that, together with the x-axis, form a container holding the maximum amount of water.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we use two pointers in the optimal solution for 'Container With Most Water'?
Two pointers start at both ends and move inward to efficiently check all possible containers without checking every pair, reducing time complexity to O(n).
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the two-pointer approach, which pointer do we move and why?
We move the pointer at the shorter line inward because moving the longer line won't increase the container size; the height is limited by the shorter line.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of the two-pointer solution for 'Container With Most Water'?
O(n), where n is the number of lines, because each pointer moves at most n times.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Show the formula to calculate the area of water contained between two lines at positions i and j.
Area = min(height[i], height[j]) * (j - i), where height[i] and height[j] are the heights of the lines and (j - i) is the distance between them.
Click to reveal answer
What does the 'Container With Most Water' problem ask you to maximize?
AThe sum of heights of all lines
BThe distance between the two tallest lines
CThe area between two lines and the x-axis
DThe number of lines used
✗ Incorrect
The problem asks to find two lines that form a container with the maximum area of water.
In the two-pointer method, where do the pointers start?
AOne at the start and one at the end
BBoth at the end of the array
CBoth at the start of the array
DRandom positions
✗ Incorrect
Pointers start at both ends to check the widest container first and then move inward.
Why do we move the pointer at the shorter line in the two-pointer approach?
ABecause the longer line is always better
BBecause the shorter line limits the container height
CTo increase the distance between pointers
DTo decrease the area
✗ Incorrect
The container's height is limited by the shorter line, so moving it may find a taller line and increase area.
What is the time complexity of the two-pointer solution?
AO(n)
BO(n log n)
CO(n^2)
DO(log n)
✗ Incorrect
The two-pointer approach checks each line at most once, resulting in linear time complexity.
Which of these is the correct formula for the container area between lines i and j?
Amax(height[i], height[j]) * (j - i)
Bheight[i] * height[j]
Cheight[i] + height[j] + (j - i)
Dmin(height[i], height[j]) * (j - i)
✗ Incorrect
Area is calculated by the shorter height times the distance between the lines.
Explain the two-pointer approach to solve the 'Container With Most Water' problem.
Think about how moving the shorter line pointer can help find a bigger container.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why the two-pointer method is more efficient than checking all pairs of lines.
Consider how many pairs there are and how two pointers reduce that.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the problem Container With Most Water ask you to find given an array of heights?
easy
A. The maximum area formed between two vertical lines and the x-axis
B. The minimum height in the array
C. The sum of all heights
D. The longest increasing subsequence of heights
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The problem asks to find two lines that together with the x-axis form a container holding the most water, which means maximizing the area between them.
Step 2: Identify what to calculate
The area is calculated by the distance between the two lines multiplied by the smaller height of the two lines.
Final Answer:
The maximum area formed between two vertical lines and the x-axis -> Option A
Quick Check:
Container with most water = max area between lines [OK]
Hint: Look for two lines maximizing width x min height [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing sum of heights with area
Choosing tallest lines without considering distance
Ignoring the smaller height between two lines
2. Which Rust code snippet correctly declares a vector of heights for the Container With Most Water problem?
easy
A. let heights = {1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7};
B. let heights = vec![1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7];
C. let heights = (1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7);
D. let heights = [1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7];
Solution
Step 1: Identify Rust vector syntax
In Rust, a vector is declared using vec![...] macro to create a growable array.
Step 2: Check each option
let heights = vec![1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7]; uses vec![...] correctly. let heights = [1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7]; is an array, not a vector. let heights = (1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7); is a tuple. let heights = {1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7}; uses braces which is invalid syntax.
Final Answer:
let heights = vec![1, 8, 6, 2, 5, 4, 8, 3, 7]; -> Option B
Quick Check:
Vector syntax = vec![...] [OK]
Hint: Use vec![...] for vectors in Rust [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using array syntax instead of vector
Using tuple parentheses instead of brackets
Using braces which is invalid
3. What is the output of this Rust code snippet that finds the max water container area?
fn max_area(height: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut left = 0;
let mut right = height.len() - 1;
let mut max_area = 0;
while left < right {
let width = (right - left) as i32;
let h = if height[left] < height[right] { height[left] } else { height[right] };
let area = width * h;
if area > max_area {
max_area = area;
}
if height[left] < height[right] {
left += 1;
} else {
right -= 1;
}
}
max_area
}
fn main() {
let heights = vec![1,8,6,2,5,4,8,3,7];
println!("{}", max_area(heights));
}
medium
A. 48
B. 56
C. 64
D. 49
Solution
Step 1: Understand the two-pointer approach
Start with left at 0 and right at last index, calculate area, move pointer with smaller height inward.
Step 2: Trace the code with given heights
Max area found is between height 8 at index 1 and height 7 at index 8, width = 7, area = 7 * 7 = 49.
Final Answer:
49 -> Option D
Quick Check:
Max area = 49 [OK]
Hint: Use two pointers, move smaller height inward [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Calculating area with max height instead of min
Not updating max area correctly
Moving wrong pointer in the loop
4. Identify the bug in this Rust function for Container With Most Water and select the fix:
fn max_area(height: Vec<i32>) -> i32 {
let mut left = 0;
let mut right = height.len();
let mut max_area = 0;
while left < right {
let width = (right - left) as i32;
let h = if height[left] < height[right] { height[left] } else { height[right] };
let area = width * h;
if area > max_area {
max_area = area;
}
if height[left] < height[right] {
left += 1;
} else {
right -= 1;
}
}
max_area
}
medium
A. Change right initialization to height.len() - 1
B. Change while condition to left <= right
C. Use max instead of min height for area calculation
D. Remove the if condition inside the loop
Solution
Step 1: Check initialization of right pointer
Rust vectors are zero-indexed, so last index is length - 1, not length.
Step 2: Identify impact of wrong right pointer
Using length causes out-of-bounds access when accessing height[right], leading to runtime error.
Final Answer:
Change right initialization to height.len() - 1 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Right pointer = last index = len() - 1 [OK]
Hint: Index last element with len() - 1, not len() [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using length as index causing panic
Changing loop condition incorrectly
Using max height instead of min for area
5. Given a vector of heights, how would you modify the two-pointer approach to also return the indices of the two lines forming the container with the most water?
hard
A. Return the sum of the two heights instead of area
B. Use a nested loop to check all pairs and store indices of max area
C. Keep track of max_area and update a tuple (left_index, right_index) whenever max_area changes
D. Only return the left pointer index as the answer
Solution
Step 1: Understand the two-pointer approach
We move pointers inward and calculate area at each step, updating max area found.
Step 2: Track indices when max area updates
Along with max_area, store the current left and right indices whenever a larger area is found.
Final Answer:
Keep track of max_area and update a tuple (left_index, right_index) whenever max_area changes -> Option C
Quick Check:
Track indices with max area updates [OK]
Hint: Update indices when max area changes [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Returning sum instead of area
Using nested loops losing O(n) efficiency
Returning only one index instead of both
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.