Discover how a simple rule can solve a seemingly impossible puzzle step by step!
Why Tower of Hanoi Problem in DSA Python?
Imagine you have three pegs and a stack of different sized disks on one peg. Your goal is to move all disks to another peg, but you can only move one disk at a time and never place a bigger disk on top of a smaller one. Trying to figure out the steps manually gets confusing very fast as the number of disks grows.
Manually planning each move is slow and easy to mess up. You might forget a step or break the rules by placing a bigger disk on a smaller one. The number of moves grows quickly, making it almost impossible to keep track without a clear method.
The Tower of Hanoi problem uses a simple, clear set of rules and recursion to break down the big problem into smaller ones. This method tells you exactly which disk to move and when, so you never get stuck or confused.
def move_disks(n, source, target, auxiliary): # Try to move disks manually without a plan pass # Too complex to write manually
def move_disks(n, source, target, auxiliary): if n == 1: print(f"Move disk 1 from {source} to {target}") else: move_disks(n-1, source, auxiliary, target) print(f"Move disk {n} from {source} to {target}") move_disks(n-1, auxiliary, target, source)
This problem teaches how to solve complex tasks by breaking them into smaller, manageable steps using recursion.
Moving a stack of plates from one shelf to another without breaking or mixing them up, by carefully moving one plate at a time following a clear plan.
Manual planning is confusing and error-prone for many disks.
Recursion breaks the problem into smaller, easier steps.
Following the recursive method guarantees a correct solution.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand the formula for minimum moves
The minimum moves required for n disks is 2^n - 1.Step 2: Calculate for 3 disks
For 3 disks, minimum moves = 2^3 - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7.Final Answer:
7 -> Option BQuick Check:
2^3 - 1 = 7 [OK]
- Using n instead of 2^n - 1
- Calculating 2*n - 1 instead of 2^n - 1
- Confusing number of disks with moves
Solution
Step 1: Identify base case for recursion
The base case stops recursion when only one disk is left, i.e., n == 1.Step 2: Understand base case action
When n == 1, the disk is moved directly from source to target.Final Answer:
if n == 1: move disk -> Option DQuick Check:
Base case is n == 1 [OK]
- Using n == 0 as base case incorrectly
- Not defining a base case causing infinite recursion
- Using invalid conditions like n < 0
def hanoi(n, source, target, auxiliary):
if n == 0:
return
hanoi(n-1, source, auxiliary, target)
print(f"Move disk {n} from {source} to {target}")
hanoi(n-1, auxiliary, target, source)
hanoi(2, 'A', 'C', 'B')Solution
Step 1: Trace recursive calls for n=2
First, move disk 1 from A to B, then disk 2 from A to C, then disk 1 from B to C.Step 2: Verify print statements order
Prints match the moves: disk 1 A->B, disk 2 A->C, disk 1 B->C.Final Answer:
Move disk 1 from A to B Move disk 2 from A to C Move disk 1 from B to C -> Option AQuick Check:
Correct move sequence for 2 disks [OK]
- Mixing source and auxiliary rods
- Printing moves in wrong order
- Confusing disk numbers
def hanoi(n, source, target, auxiliary):
if n == 1:
print(f"Move disk {n} from {source} to {target}")
else:
hanoi(n-1, source, target, auxiliary)
print(f"Move disk {n} from {source} to {target}")
hanoi(n-1, auxiliary, target, source)Solution
Step 1: Analyze recursive calls
The first recursive call incorrectly moves disks from source to target instead of auxiliary.Step 2: Correct the first recursive call
It should be hanoi(n-1, source, auxiliary, target) to move disks to auxiliary rod first.Final Answer:
Change first recursive call to hanoi(n-1, source, auxiliary, target) -> Option AQuick Check:
Correct recursive call order fixes the error [OK]
- Calling recursion with wrong target rod
- Changing base case incorrectly
- Swapping print statements unnecessarily
Solution
Step 1: Apply minimum moves formula for 3 rods
Minimum moves for n disks with 3 rods is 2^n - 1, so for 4 disks: 2^4 - 1 = 15.Step 2: Understand why moves can't be less
With 3 rods, no shortcut exists; all disks must be moved following rules, so 15 is minimum.Final Answer:
15 moves, because 2^4 - 1 is the minimum for 3 rods -> Option CQuick Check:
Minimum moves = 2^n - 1 for 3 rods [OK]
- Assuming fewer moves possible with 3 rods
- Adding extra moves unnecessarily
- Confusing number of rods with moves
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
