Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Pythonprogramming~20 mins

0 1 Knapsack Problem in DSA Python - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Knapsack Mastery
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of 0 1 Knapsack DP Table
What is the final DP table (2D list) after running the 0 1 Knapsack algorithm on the given input?
DSA Python
def knapsack(weights, values, capacity):
    n = len(weights)
    dp = [[0] * (capacity + 1) for _ in range(n + 1)]
    for i in range(1, n + 1):
        for w in range(capacity + 1):
            if weights[i-1] <= w:
                dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], dp[i-1][w - weights[i-1]] + values[i-1])
            else:
                dp[i][w] = dp[i-1][w]
    return dp

weights = [1, 3, 4]
values = [15, 50, 60]
capacity = 5
result = knapsack(weights, values, capacity)
print(result)
A[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15], [0, 15, 15, 50, 50, 65], [0, 15, 15, 50, 60, 75]]
B[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15], [0, 15, 15, 50, 65, 65], [0, 15, 15, 50, 60, 80]]
C[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15], [0, 15, 15, 50, 65, 65], [0, 15, 15, 50, 60, 60]]
D[[0, 0, 0, 0, 0, 0], [0, 15, 15, 15, 15, 15], [0, 15, 15, 50, 65, 65], [0, 15, 15, 50, 60, 75]]
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Trace the DP table row by row, considering if the current item fits or not.
🧠 Conceptual
intermediate
1:30remaining
Maximum Value in 0 1 Knapsack
Given weights = [2, 3, 5], values = [20, 30, 50], and capacity = 5, what is the maximum value achievable?
A30
B50
C20
D80
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check which items fit without exceeding capacity and sum their values.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the error in this 0 1 Knapsack code snippet
What error does this code produce when run? ```python def knapsack(weights, values, capacity): n = len(weights) dp = [[0] * (capacity + 1) for _ in range(n)] for i in range(n): for w in range(capacity + 1): if weights[i] <= w: dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], dp[i-1][w - weights[i]] + values[i]) else: dp[i][w] = dp[i-1][w] return dp[n-1][capacity] weights = [1, 2] values = [10, 20] capacity = 3 print(knapsack(weights, values, capacity)) ```
AIndexError
BTypeError
CKeyError
DNo error, outputs 30
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Check how dp is initialized and accessed at dp[i-1].
🚀 Application
advanced
2:30remaining
Find selected items in 0 1 Knapsack
After computing the DP table for weights = [1, 3, 4], values = [15, 50, 60], capacity = 5, which items are selected to achieve max value?
AItems with weights 1 and 3
BItems with weights 3 and 4
CItems with weights 1 and 4
DOnly item with weight 4
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Trace back from dp[n][capacity] to find which items were included.
🧠 Conceptual
expert
1:30remaining
Time Complexity of 0 1 Knapsack DP
What is the time complexity of the classic 0 1 Knapsack dynamic programming solution with n items and capacity W?
AO(n * W)
BO(n + W)
CO(n^2 * W)
DO(2^n)
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Consider the nested loops over items and capacity.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the 0 1 Knapsack Problem aim to maximize given a set of items with weights and values?
easy
A. The total value of items without exceeding the weight limit
B. The total weight of items regardless of value
C. The number of items selected
D. The minimum weight of items selected

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem goal

    The 0 1 Knapsack Problem tries to select items to maximize total value without exceeding the weight capacity.
  2. Step 2: Clarify constraints

    Each item can be chosen only once (0 or 1 times), so the goal is to maximize value under weight limit.
  3. Final Answer:

    The total value of items without exceeding the weight limit -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Maximize value under weight limit = The total value of items without exceeding the weight limit [OK]
Hint: Focus on maximizing value, not weight or count [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing weight maximization with value maximization
  • Thinking the problem counts items instead of values
  • Ignoring the weight limit constraint
2. Which of the following is the correct Python syntax to initialize a 2D list dp of size (n+1) x (W+1) filled with zeros for the 0 1 Knapsack DP table?
easy
A. dp = [[0 for _ in range(W+1)] for _ in range(n+1)]
B. dp = [[0] * n for _ in range(W)]
C. dp = [0] * (n+1) * (W+1)
D. dp = [[0] * (W+1)] * (n+1)

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand 2D list initialization

    Using list comprehension with nested loops creates independent inner lists, avoiding shared references.
  2. Step 2: Analyze each option

    dp = [[0 for _ in range(W+1)] for _ in range(n+1)] correctly uses nested list comprehension to create a (n+1) x (W+1) zero matrix.
  3. Final Answer:

    dp = [[0 for _ in range(W+1)] for _ in range(n+1)] -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Nested list comprehension for 2D zero matrix = dp = [[0 for _ in range(W+1)] for _ in range(n+1)] [OK]
Hint: Use nested list comprehension for 2D lists [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using multiplication for inner lists causing shared references
  • Creating 1D list instead of 2D
  • Swapping dimensions incorrectly
3. What is the output of the following Python code snippet implementing 0 1 Knapsack DP for items with weights [1, 2, 3] and values [10, 20, 30] and capacity 5?
def knapsack(weights, values, W):
    n = len(weights)
    dp = [[0]*(W+1) for _ in range(n+1)]
    for i in range(1, n+1):
        for w in range(1, W+1):
            if weights[i-1] <= w:
                dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], dp[i-1][w-weights[i-1]] + values[i-1])
            else:
                dp[i][w] = dp[i-1][w]
    return dp[n][W]

print(knapsack([1,2,3], [10,20,30], 5))
medium
A. 60
B. 40
C. 50
D. 30

Solution

  1. Step 1: Trace DP table filling

    Items: (1,10), (2,20), (3,30), Capacity=5. Check combinations:
    - Take items 2 and 3: weight=5, value=50
    - Take items 1 and 3: weight=4, value=40
    - Take all items 1,2,3: weight=6 (exceeds capacity)
    - Take items 1 and 2: weight=3, value=30
  2. Step 2: Find max value within capacity

    Best is items 2 and 3 with total value 50, but check if better:
    Actually, items 1,2,3 total weight 6 > 5, so not allowed.
    Items 1,2,3 can't all be taken.
    Check items 1,2,3 subsets:
    Items 2,3: 5 weight, 50 value
    Items 1,3: 4 weight, 40 value
    Items 1,2: 3 weight, 30 value
    So max value is 50.
  3. Final Answer:

    50 -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Max value under weight 5 = 50 [OK]
Hint: Check all item subsets under capacity for max value [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assuming all items fit without checking weight
  • Mixing up indices in DP table
  • Forgetting to subtract weight when adding value
4. Find the error in this 0 1 Knapsack DP code snippet and select the fix:
def knapsack(weights, values, W):
    n = len(weights)
    dp = [[0]*(W+1) for _ in range(n+1)]
    for i in range(1, n+1):
        for w in range(1, W+1):
            if weights[i] <= w:
                dp[i][w] = max(dp[i-1][w], dp[i-1][w-weights[i]] + values[i])
            else:
                dp[i][w] = dp[i-1][w]
    return dp[n][W]
medium
A. Change range(1, W+1) to range(W)
B. Change dp[i-1][w] to dp[i][w]
C. Initialize dp with ones instead of zeros
D. Change weights[i] to weights[i-1] and values[i] to values[i-1]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify index error in array access

    Python lists are zero-indexed, but loop uses i from 1 to n, so weights[i] and values[i] cause IndexError or wrong access.
  2. Step 2: Correct indexing for weights and values

    Use weights[i-1] and values[i-1] to access correct item corresponding to dp row i.
  3. Final Answer:

    Change weights[i] to weights[i-1] and values[i] to values[i-1] -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Fix indexing to avoid off-by-one errors = Change weights[i] to weights[i-1] and values[i] to values[i-1] [OK]
Hint: Use i-1 to index weights and values inside loops [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using i instead of i-1 for zero-based lists
  • Changing dp indices incorrectly
  • Altering loop ranges unnecessarily
5. Given items with weights [2, 3, 4, 5] and values [3, 4, 5, 6], and a knapsack capacity of 5, which items should be selected to maximize value? Also, what is the maximum value achievable?
hard
A. Select item with weight 5 only; max value 6
B. Select items with weights 2 and 3; max value 7
C. Select items with weights 3 and 4; max value 9
D. Select items with weights 2 and 4; max value 8

Solution

  1. Step 1: List possible item combinations under capacity 5

    Check combinations:
    - Item 1 (2,3) + Item 2 (3,4): total weight 5, value 7
    - Item 3 (4,5) alone: weight 4, value 5
    - Item 4 (5,6) alone: weight 5, value 6
    - Item 2 (3,4) + Item 3 (4,5): weight 7 (exceeds capacity)
    - Item 1 (2,3) + Item 3 (4,5): weight 6 (exceeds capacity)
  2. Step 2: Choose combination with max value

    Items 1 and 2 together fit exactly and give value 7, which is higher than any single item value under capacity.
  3. Final Answer:

    Select items with weights 2 and 3; max value 7 -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    Max value with capacity 5 = 7 by items 2 and 3 weights [OK]
Hint: Try all item pairs fitting capacity, pick max value [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Choosing heavier single item over lighter combo
  • Ignoring exact capacity limit
  • Assuming max value is from single item
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard