It is a problem where you check if a given string can be split into a sequence of one or more dictionary words.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What data structure is commonly used to store the dictionary in the Word Break Problem?
A set or hash set is commonly used for fast lookup of dictionary words.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the main approach to solve the Word Break Problem efficiently?
Use dynamic programming to check substrings and store results to avoid repeated work.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the Word Break Problem, what does the DP array represent?
Each position in the DP array indicates whether the substring up to that position can be segmented into dictionary words.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why is it important to check all possible partitions in the Word Break Problem?
Because the string might be segmented in multiple ways, and we need to find at least one valid segmentation.
Click to reveal answer
What does the Word Break Problem ask you to determine?
AIf a string can be segmented into dictionary words
BIf a string is a palindrome
CIf a string contains only letters
DIf a string has repeated characters
✗ Incorrect
The Word Break Problem checks if the string can be split into valid dictionary words.
Which technique is commonly used to solve the Word Break Problem efficiently?
ADynamic Programming
BGreedy Algorithm
CDepth First Search without memoization
DSorting
✗ Incorrect
Dynamic Programming helps avoid repeated checks by storing intermediate results.
What does dp[i] represent in the Word Break Problem's DP solution?
ANumber of dictionary words used
BLength of the longest word in dictionary
CIndex of last matched word
DWhether substring s[0..i-1] can be segmented
✗ Incorrect
dp[i] is true if the substring from start to i-1 can be segmented into dictionary words.
What data structure is best for quick dictionary word lookup?
AStack
BArray
CSet or Hash Set
DLinked List
✗ Incorrect
Set or Hash Set provides O(1) average lookup time for words.
If the string is 'applepenapple' and dictionary is ['apple', 'pen'], what is the answer to the Word Break Problem?
AFalse
BTrue
CDepends on order
DCannot determine
✗ Incorrect
'applepenapple' can be segmented as 'apple' + 'pen' + 'apple', so answer is True.
Explain how dynamic programming helps solve the Word Break Problem.
Think about how you remember past results to avoid redoing work.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe the steps to check if a string can be segmented using a dictionary.
Consider how you try all splits and remember which parts worked.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Word Break Problem ask you to determine about a given string s and a dictionary of words wordDict?
easy
A. If s contains any substring from wordDict
B. If s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words
C. If s is exactly equal to any word in wordDict
D. If s can be reversed to form a word in wordDict
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The Word Break Problem asks whether the entire string s can be split into parts where each part is a word from the dictionary wordDict.
Step 2: Compare options with the problem definition
If s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words correctly states the problem as checking if s can be segmented into dictionary words. Other options describe partial or different checks.
Final Answer:
If s can be segmented into a space-separated sequence of one or more dictionary words -> Option B
Quick Check:
Word Break Problem = segmentation check [OK]
Hint: Remember: Word Break means full segmentation check [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking it checks for substring presence only
Confusing exact match with segmentation
Assuming reversal or partial matches
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a function named wordBreak in JavaScript that takes two parameters: s (string) and wordDict (array)?
easy
A. function wordBreak[s, wordDict] {}
B. def wordBreak(s, wordDict): {}
C. func wordBreak(s, wordDict) {}
D. function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {}
Solution
Step 1: Recall JavaScript function syntax
In JavaScript, functions are declared using the function keyword followed by the name and parentheses enclosing parameters.
Step 2: Check each option's syntax
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {} uses correct JavaScript syntax. def wordBreak(s, wordDict): {} is Python syntax. func wordBreak(s, wordDict) {} resembles Go syntax. function wordBreak[s, wordDict] {} uses incorrect brackets.
Final Answer:
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {} -> Option D
Quick Check:
JS function syntax = function name(params) {} [OK]
Hint: JS functions use parentheses for parameters, not brackets [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using Python or other language syntax
Using square brackets instead of parentheses
Missing function keyword
3. What will be the output of the following JavaScript code?
const s = "leetcode";
const wordDict = ["leet", "code"];
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {
const dp = Array(s.length + 1).fill(false);
dp[0] = true;
for (let i = 1; i <= s.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && wordDict.includes(s.substring(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length];
}
console.log(wordBreak(s, wordDict));
medium
A. undefined
B. false
C. true
D. TypeError
Solution
Step 1: Understand the dynamic programming array dp
dp[i] means if substring s[0..i-1] can be segmented. dp[0] = true means empty string is segmentable.
Step 2: Trace the loops and substring checks
For s = "leetcode", wordDict = ["leet", "code"], dp updates to true at dp[4] ("leet") and dp[8] ("leetcode") because both substrings are in wordDict.
Final Answer:
true -> Option C
Quick Check:
"leetcode" split as "leet" + "code" = true [OK]
Hint: Check dp array updates for substring matches [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing substring indices
Not initializing dp[0] to true
Assuming partial matches are enough
4. The following code attempts to solve the Word Break Problem but has a bug. What is the bug?
function wordBreak(s, wordDict) {
const dp = Array(s.length).fill(false);
dp[0] = true;
for (let i = 1; i <= s.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && wordDict.includes(s.substring(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length];
}
medium
A. dp array length is incorrect; should be s.length + 1
B. dp[0] should be false, not true
C. substring indices are reversed in s.substring(j, i)
D. wordDict.includes should be replaced with wordDict.indexOf
Solution
Step 1: Check dp array initialization
dp array length should be s.length + 1 to include dp[s.length] index. Current length s.length causes out-of-bound errors.
Step 2: Verify dp usage and return statement
dp[s.length] is accessed at return, but dp array does not have that index, causing undefined or error.
Final Answer:
dp array length is incorrect; should be s.length + 1 -> Option A
Quick Check:
dp length = s.length + 1 for full coverage [OK]
Hint: dp array must cover from 0 to s.length inclusive [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using dp length equal to s.length only
Misunderstanding dp index meaning
Ignoring off-by-one errors
5. Given the string s = "applepenapple" and dictionary wordDict = ["apple", "pen"], which of the following modifications to the Word Break algorithm will allow it to return true only if all possible segmentations of s are valid dictionary words (not just one)?
hard
A. Change dp to store counts of valid segmentations and check if count equals total segmentations
B. Return true as soon as one valid segmentation is found (current approach)
C. Use a stack to store all substrings and check each against wordDict once
D. Sort wordDict and use binary search for substring checks
Solution
Step 1: Understand current algorithm behavior
The current algorithm returns true if at least one segmentation exists. It does not check all segmentations.
Step 2: Modify dp to count all valid segmentations
By storing counts of valid segmentations at each dp index, we can compare total segmentations to valid ones. Returning true only if all segmentations are valid requires counting and comparing.
Final Answer:
Change dp to store counts of valid segmentations and check if count equals total segmentations -> Option A
Quick Check:
Counting all segmentations ensures all are valid [OK]
Hint: Count all segmentations, not just existence, for full validation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming one valid segmentation means all are valid
Ignoring need to track all segmentation paths
Confusing substring search optimization with segmentation count
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.