📖 Scenario: Imagine you are helping a robot find how many different ways it can move from the top-left corner to the bottom-right corner of a grid. The robot can only move right or down.
🎯 Goal: Build a program that calculates the number of unique paths the robot can take in a grid of given rows and columns using dynamic programming.
📋 What You'll Learn
Create a 2D array to represent the grid
Initialize the first row and first column with 1s
Use a nested loop to fill the grid with the number of unique paths to each cell
Print the number of unique paths to reach the bottom-right cell
💡 Why This Matters
🌍 Real World
Robots and automated systems often need to find paths in grids or maps, like warehouse robots moving goods.
💼 Career
Understanding dynamic programming and grid traversal is useful for software engineers working on robotics, game development, and pathfinding algorithms.
Progress0 / 4 steps
1
Create the grid
Create a 2D array called grid with 3 rows and 4 columns filled with zeros.
DSA Javascript
Hint
Use Array.from with a mapping function to create a 2D array.
2
Initialize first row and column
Set all cells in the first row of grid to 1 using a for loop with variable col. Then set all cells in the first column of grid to 1 using a for loop with variable row.
DSA Javascript
Hint
Use two separate for loops to set the first row and first column to 1.
3
Fill the grid with unique paths count
Use nested for loops with variables row and col starting from 1 to fill each cell in grid with the sum of the cell above it and the cell to the left.
DSA Javascript
Hint
Each cell is the sum of the cell above and the cell to the left.
4
Print the number of unique paths
Print the value in the bottom-right cell of grid using console.log(grid[2][3]).
DSA Javascript
Hint
The bottom-right cell holds the total unique paths.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the problem Unique Paths in Grid DP ask you to find?
easy
A. The number of different ways to move from the top-left to bottom-right corner of a grid using only right and down moves.
B. The shortest path length from top-left to bottom-right in a grid.
C. The maximum sum path from top-left to bottom-right in a grid.
D. The number of obstacles in the grid.
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks for counting all possible paths from the top-left corner to the bottom-right corner of a grid, moving only right or down.
Step 2: Differentiate from other path problems
It is not about shortest path length, maximum sum, or obstacles count, but about counting unique paths.
Final Answer:
The number of different ways to move from the top-left to bottom-right corner of a grid using only right and down moves. -> Option A
Quick Check:
Unique paths count = number of ways to move right/down [OK]
Hint: Count paths by moving only right or down [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing unique paths with shortest path length
Thinking about obstacles when none are given
Counting diagonal moves
2. Which of the following JavaScript code snippets correctly initializes a 2D array dp of size m x n filled with zeros for the Unique Paths problem?
easy
A. const dp = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array(n).fill(0));
B. const dp = Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0));
C. const dp = new Array(m).map(() => new Array(n));
D. const dp = Array(m).map(() => Array(n));
Solution
Step 1: Understand array initialization in JavaScript
Using Array.from with a mapping function creates independent inner arrays, avoiding shared references.
Step 2: Analyze each option
const dp = Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0)); shares the same inner array reference for all rows, causing bugs. Options C and D create inner arrays with undefined elements instead of zeros (missing .fill(0)). const dp = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array(n).fill(0)); correctly creates independent arrays filled with zeros.
Final Answer:
const dp = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array(n).fill(0)); -> Option A
Quick Check:
Use Array.from with arrow function for 2D array [OK]
Hint: Use Array.from with function to avoid shared inner arrays [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using fill with array directly causing shared references
Not filling inner arrays with zeros (elements undefined)
Not initializing inner arrays separately
3. What is the output of the following JavaScript code for uniquePaths(3, 3)?
function uniquePaths(m, n) {
const dp = Array.from({ length: m }, () => Array(n).fill(0));
for (let i = 0; i < m; i++) dp[i][0] = 1;
for (let j = 0; j < n; j++) dp[0][j] = 1;
for (let i = 1; i < m; i++) {
for (let j = 1; j < n; j++) {
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j] + dp[i][j - 1];
}
}
return dp[m - 1][n - 1];
}
console.log(uniquePaths(3, 3));
medium
A. 3
B. 6
C. 9
D. 12
Solution
Step 1: Initialize dp array and base cases
Set first row and first column to 1 because only one way to reach cells in first row or column.
Adding instead of summing dp[i-1][j] and dp[i][j-1]
Off-by-one errors in loops
4. The following code attempts to solve the Unique Paths problem but overwrites values across multiple rows unexpectedly for uniquePaths(3, 3). What is the bug?
function uniquePaths(m, n) {
const dp = Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0));
for (let i = 0; i < m; i++) dp[i][0] = 1;
for (let j = 0; j < n; j++) dp[0][j] = 1;
for (let i = 1; i < m; i++) {
for (let j = 1; j < n; j++) {
dp[i][j] = dp[i - 1][j] + dp[i][j - 1];
}
}
return dp[m - 1][n - 1];
}
medium
A. The dp array is not initialized with zeros.
B. The loops start from 1 instead of 0.
C. Using fill with array causes all rows to reference the same array.
D. The return statement is outside the function.
Solution
Step 1: Analyze dp initialization
Using Array(m).fill(Array(n).fill(0)) makes all rows point to the same inner array, so updating one row updates all rows.
Step 2: Understand effect on dp updates
Setting dp[i][0] = 1 changes the same array for all rows. During table filling, updates overwrite values from earlier rows (e.g., dp[1][1] becomes 3 instead of 2), causing incorrect intermediate values.
Final Answer:
Using fill with array causes all rows to reference the same array. -> Option C
Quick Check:
Shared references cause wrong dp updates [OK]
Hint: Avoid fill with array; use Array.from for independent rows [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using fill with array causing shared references
Incorrect loop ranges
Misplaced return statement
5. Given a grid with obstacles represented by a 2D array obstacleGrid where 1 means obstacle and 0 means free cell, how would you modify the Unique Paths DP solution to count unique paths avoiding obstacles?
hard
A. Set dp[i][j] = 1 for all cells without checking obstacles.
B. Ignore obstacles and calculate paths as usual.
C. Use recursion without memoization to count paths.
D. Initialize dp with zeros, set dp[0][0] = 1 if no obstacle, then for each cell dp[i][j] = 0 if obstacle else dp[i-1][j] + dp[i][j-1].
Solution
Step 1: Initialize dp considering obstacles
Set dp[0][0] to 1 only if the start cell has no obstacle; otherwise 0.
Step 2: Update dp cells with obstacle check
For each cell, if obstacleGrid[i][j] is 1, dp[i][j] = 0 (no path). Else dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j] + dp[i][j-1].
Step 3: Return dp[m-1][n-1]
This gives the count of unique paths avoiding obstacles.
Final Answer:
Initialize dp with zeros, set dp[0][0] = 1 if no obstacle, then for each cell dp[i][j] = 0 if obstacle else dp[i-1][j] + dp[i][j-1]. -> Option D
Quick Check:
Obstacle cells block paths by setting dp to 0 [OK]
Hint: Set dp=0 for obstacles, sum paths only for free cells [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring obstacles in dp calculation
Not initializing start cell properly
Using recursion without memoization causing inefficiency
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.