What if you could count all islands on a map perfectly without missing a single one or counting twice?
Why Number of Islands BFS and DFS in DSA Javascript?
Imagine you have a big map made of squares, where some squares are water and some are land. You want to count how many separate islands (groups of connected land squares) are on the map. Doing this by looking at each square and trying to remember which islands you already counted can get very confusing and slow.
Trying to count islands by checking each square manually is slow and easy to mess up. You might count the same island twice or miss some parts because it's hard to keep track of which land squares belong together. This makes the task error-prone and frustrating.
Using BFS (Breadth-First Search) or DFS (Depth-First Search) helps you explore each island fully once you find a piece of land. These methods let you visit all connected land squares systematically, marking them as visited so you don't count them again. This way, you can count islands quickly and correctly.
let count = 0; for (let i = 0; i < grid.length; i++) { for (let j = 0; j < grid[0].length; j++) { if (grid[i][j] === '1') count++; } }
function bfs(grid, i, j) {
// explore all connected land
}
let count = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < grid.length; i++) {
for (let j = 0; j < grid[0].length; j++) {
if (grid[i][j] === '1') {
bfs(grid, i, j);
count++;
}
}
}This lets you quickly and accurately find how many islands are on any map, no matter how big or complex.
Think about a drone flying over a flooded area trying to count how many separate dry patches (islands) are left. BFS or DFS helps the drone's software count these patches without missing or double-counting any.
Manual counting is slow and error-prone.
BFS and DFS explore connected land fully to avoid double counting.
This method works well for any size or shape of map.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand the grid representation
The grid contains '1's representing land and '0's representing water.Step 2: Identify what an island means
An island is a group of connected '1's horizontally or vertically.Final Answer:
Count how many groups of connected '1's (islands) are in the grid -> Option AQuick Check:
Number of islands = count of connected '1' groups [OK]
- Confusing island count with largest island size
- Counting '0's instead of '1's
- Ignoring connectivity rules (only horizontal/vertical)
Solution
Step 1: Check boundary conditions for DFS
We must stop DFS if row or column is outside grid bounds.Step 2: Write correct boundary check
Row or column less than 0 or greater or equal to grid size means out of bounds.Final Answer:
function dfs(grid, r, c) { if (r < 0 || c < 0 || r >= grid.length || c >= grid[0].length) return; } -> Option DQuick Check:
Boundary check includes all invalid indices [OK]
- Using > instead of >= for boundary check
- Missing some boundary conditions
- Using <= 0 which excludes valid index 0
const grid = [
['1','1','0','0'],
['1','0','0','1'],
['0','0','1','1'],
['0','0','0','0']
];
function numIslands(grid) {
let count = 0;
const dfs = (r, c) => {
if (r < 0 || c < 0 || r >= grid.length || c >= grid[0].length || grid[r][c] === '0') return;
grid[r][c] = '0';
dfs(r + 1, c);
dfs(r - 1, c);
dfs(r, c + 1);
dfs(r, c - 1);
};
for (let r = 0; r < grid.length; r++) {
for (let c = 0; c < grid[0].length; c++) {
if (grid[r][c] === '1') {
dfs(r, c);
count++;
}
}
}
return count;
}
console.log(numIslands(grid));Solution
Step 1: Identify islands in the grid
Islands are groups of connected '1's. Here, islands are: top-left (3 cells: (0,0),(0,1),(1,0)), single cell at (1,3), and bottom cluster (2 cells: (2,2),(2,3)). Total islands = 3.Step 2: Count islands using DFS
DFS marks visited '1's as '0'. After visiting each island, count increments. Total islands counted = 3.Final Answer:
3 -> Option BQuick Check:
Count connected '1' groups = 3 [OK]
- Counting diagonal connections as islands
- Not marking visited cells, causing overcount
- Misreading grid layout
function bfs(grid, r, c) {
const queue = [[r, c]];
while (queue.length > 0) {
const [row, col] = queue.shift();
if (row < 0 || col < 0 || row >= grid.length || col >= grid[0].length || grid[row][col] === '0') continue;
grid[row][col] = '0';
queue.push([row + 1, col]);
queue.push([row - 1, col]);
queue.push([row, col + 1]);
queue.push([row, col - 1]);
}
}Solution
Step 1: Analyze neighbor addition in BFS
The code adds neighbors to the queue without checking if they are visited or water.Step 2: Identify consequence of missing check
This causes multiple visits to the same cell, increasing runtime and possible infinite loops.Final Answer:
It does not check if a cell is already visited before pushing neighbors -> Option AQuick Check:
Check before enqueueing neighbors to avoid repeats [OK]
- Thinking queue.shift() inefficiency is the bug here
- Marking visited after enqueue instead of before
- Confusing recursion with iteration
Solution
Step 1: Understand connectivity rules
Diagonal connections mean neighbors include diagonals, not just up/down/left/right.Step 2: Modify DFS to include diagonal neighbors
Add DFS calls for (r+1,c+1), (r+1,c-1), (r-1,c+1), (r-1,c-1) along with existing neighbors.Final Answer:
Add diagonal neighbors (r+1,c+1), (r+1,c-1), (r-1,c+1), (r-1,c-1) to DFS calls -> Option CQuick Check:
Include diagonal neighbors for diagonal connectivity [OK]
- Ignoring diagonal neighbors when required
- Switching BFS/DFS without changing neighbor logic
- Counting only horizontal or vertical neighbors
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
