Merge Sort as Divide and Conquer in DSA Javascript - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Recall & Review

beginner

What is the main idea behind the 'divide and conquer' approach in Merge Sort?

Divide the array into smaller parts, sort each part, then combine them back together in order.

beginner

In Merge Sort, what happens after dividing the array into two halves?

Each half is sorted recursively using Merge Sort before merging them back.

intermediate

Why is Merge Sort considered stable?

Because it keeps the original order of equal elements when merging sorted halves.

intermediate

What is the time complexity of Merge Sort and why?

O(n log n) because the array is divided log n times and merging takes linear time at each level.

beginner

Explain the role of the merge step in Merge Sort.

It combines two sorted halves into one sorted array by comparing elements one by one.

What is the first step in Merge Sort?

A Divide the array into two halves

B Merge two sorted arrays

C Sort the entire array at once

D Swap the first and last elements

Merge Sort starts by dividing the array into two halves before sorting.

How does Merge Sort combine sorted parts?

A By inserting elements at the end

B By swapping elements randomly

C By comparing elements and merging them in order

D By reversing the array

Merge Sort merges sorted halves by comparing elements to keep order.

What is the worst-case time complexity of Merge Sort?

A O(n)

B O(n^2)

C O(log n)

D O(n log n)

Merge Sort always runs in O(n log n) time due to its divide and merge steps.

Is Merge Sort an in-place sorting algorithm?

A No, it requires extra space for merging

B Yes, it sorts within the original array

C Only for small arrays

D Depends on the input

Merge Sort needs extra space to hold merged arrays during the process.

Which of these is true about Merge Sort?

A It sorts by selecting the smallest element repeatedly

B It is stable and uses divide and conquer

C It is unstable and uses swapping

D It only works on sorted arrays

Merge Sort is stable and uses the divide and conquer strategy.

Describe how Merge Sort uses the divide and conquer approach to sort an array.

Think about breaking the problem into smaller parts and then combining results.

Explain why Merge Sort has a time complexity of O(n log n).

Consider how many times the array is split and how merging works.

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind the Merge Sort algorithm?

easy

A. Select a pivot and partition the array around it

B. Sort the array by repeatedly swapping adjacent elements

C. Divide the array into halves, sort each half, then merge them

D. Insert elements one by one into a sorted list

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the divide and conquer approach

   Merge Sort splits the array into two halves recursively until single elements remain.

2. Step 2: Merge sorted halves

   After splitting, it merges the halves back in sorted order to form the sorted array.

3. Final Answer:

   Divide the array into halves, sort each half, then merge them -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Merge Sort = Divide and conquer with merging [OK]

Hint: Remember: split, sort halves, then merge [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing Merge Sort with Bubble Sort
• Thinking Merge Sort uses a pivot like Quick Sort
• Believing Merge Sort sorts in place without merging

2. Which of the following is the correct base case check in a recursive Merge Sort function in JavaScript?

easy

A. if (array.length <= 1) return array;

B. if (array.length === 0) return null;

C. if (array.length > 1) return array;

D. if (array.length === 2) return array;

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify the stopping condition for recursion

   Merge Sort stops splitting when the array has 1 or 0 elements, as these are already sorted.

2. Step 2: Correct base case syntax

   The check if (array.length <= 1) return array; correctly returns the array when it can't be split further.

3. Final Answer:

   if (array.length <= 1) return array; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Base case = array length ≤ 1 [OK]

Hint: Base case: array length 1 or less returns array [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Returning null instead of the array
• Checking for length === 2 instead of ≤ 1
• Incorrectly returning array when length > 1

3. What will be the output of the following JavaScript code using Merge Sort?

function mergeSort(arr) {
  if (arr.length <= 1) return arr;
  const mid = Math.floor(arr.length / 2);
  const left = mergeSort(arr.slice(0, mid));
  const right = mergeSort(arr.slice(mid));
  return merge(left, right);
}

function merge(left, right) {
  let result = [];
  let i = 0, j = 0;
  while (i < left.length && j < right.length) {
    if (left[i] < right[j]) {
      result.push(left[i]);
      i++;
    } else {
      result.push(right[j]);
      j++;
    }
  }
  return result.concat(left.slice(i)).concat(right.slice(j));
}

console.log(mergeSort([4, 1, 3, 2]));

medium

A. [1, 2, 3, 4]

B. [4, 3, 2, 1]

C. [1, 3, 2, 4]

D. [2, 1, 3, 4]

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace the recursive splitting

   The array [4,1,3,2] is split into [4,1] and [3,2], then further into single elements.

2. Step 2: Merge sorted halves step-by-step

   Merge [4] and [1] to get [1,4], merge [3] and [2] to get [2,3], then merge [1,4] and [2,3] to get [1,2,3,4].

3. Final Answer:

   [1, 2, 3, 4] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted array = [1, 2, 3, 4] [OK]

Hint: Merge halves in sorted order to get final sorted array [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing merge order and returning unsorted halves
• Forgetting to merge remaining elements after loop
• Incorrect slicing causing wrong splits

4. Identify the bug in this Merge Sort implementation snippet:

function mergeSort(arr) {
  if (arr.length <= 1) return arr;
  const mid = Math.floor(arr.length / 2);
  const left = mergeSort(arr.slice(0, mid));
  const right = mergeSort(arr.slice(mid));
  return merge(left, right);
}

function merge(left, right) {
  let result = [];
  let i = 0, j = 0;
  while (i < left.length || j < right.length) {
    if (left[i] < right[j]) {
      result.push(left[i]);
      i++;
    } else {
      result.push(right[j]);
      j++;
    }
  }
  return result;
}

medium

A. The base case condition is incorrect

B. The while loop condition should use && instead of ||

C. The merge function does not return the result

D. The mid calculation is wrong

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze the merge loop condition

   The loop uses while (i < left.length || j < right.length), which can cause accessing undefined elements.

2. Step 2: Correct loop condition for safe merging

   It should be while (i < left.length && j < right.length) to compare valid elements, then append leftovers after the loop.

3. Final Answer:

   The while loop condition should use && instead of || -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Use && in merge loop condition [OK]

Hint: Use && to avoid undefined element access in merge loop [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using || causes runtime errors accessing undefined
• Not appending leftover elements after loop
• Ignoring base case correctness

5. Given an array with many duplicate values, how can you modify the merge step in Merge Sort to ensure stable sorting (preserving original order of equal elements)?

hard

A. Randomly pick from left or right when elements are equal

B. When elements are equal, always take the element from the right array first

C. Skip equal elements during merge to avoid duplicates

D. When elements are equal, always take the element from the left array first

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand stable sorting in merge

   Stable sorting means equal elements keep their original order after sorting.

2. Step 2: Modify merge to preserve order

   When left[i] equals right[j], choose left[i] first to keep its original position before right[j].

3. Final Answer:

   When elements are equal, always take the element from the left array first -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Stable merge = pick left element first on ties [OK]

Hint: Pick left element first when equal to keep order stable [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Picking right element first breaks stability
• Skipping duplicates loses data
• Random choice causes unstable sort