LCS is the longest sequence that appears in the same relative order in two sequences, but not necessarily contiguously.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does dynamic programming help in finding LCS?
Dynamic programming breaks the problem into smaller overlapping subproblems, stores their results, and builds up the solution efficiently.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What does the DP table represent in LCS algorithm?
Each cell dp[i][j] stores the length of LCS of the first i characters of string1 and first j characters of string2.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the classic LCS dynamic programming solution?
The time complexity is O(m * n), where m and n are the lengths of the two input strings.
Click to reveal answer
advanced
How do you reconstruct the LCS string from the DP table?
Start from dp[m][n], move backwards: if characters match, add to LCS and move diagonally; else move in the direction of the larger dp value.
Click to reveal answer
What does the Longest Common Subsequence represent?
ALongest sequence appearing in both strings in order
BLongest substring appearing in both strings
CShortest sequence appearing in both strings
DLongest sequence appearing in either string
✗ Incorrect
LCS is the longest sequence that appears in both strings in the same order, but not necessarily contiguously.
What is the base case for the LCS dynamic programming table?
Adp[0][j] = 0 and dp[i][0] = 0 for all i, j
Bdp[0][j] = 1 and dp[i][0] = 1 for all i, j
Cdp[i][j] = 1 if characters match
Ddp[i][j] = max(i, j)
✗ Incorrect
When either string is empty, LCS length is zero, so dp[0][j] and dp[i][0] are zero.
If characters at position i and j match, how is dp[i][j] computed?
Amax(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1])
Bdp[i-1][j-1] + 1
Cdp[i-1][j-1]
Ddp[i][j-1] + 1
✗ Incorrect
When characters match, LCS length increases by 1 from dp[i-1][j-1].
What is the time complexity of the LCS algorithm using dynamic programming?
AO(m^2 + n^2)
BO(m + n)
CO(m * n)
DO(2^(m+n))
✗ Incorrect
The DP table has m rows and n columns, so time complexity is O(m * n).
Which of these is NOT true about LCS?
ALCS length is at most min(m, n)
BLCS characters appear in order
CLCS can be empty if no common characters
DLCS characters must be contiguous
✗ Incorrect
LCS characters do not need to be contiguous, only in the same order.
Explain how to build the DP table for the Longest Common Subsequence problem.
Think about comparing characters and using previous results.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe the steps to reconstruct the LCS string from the completed DP table.
Trace back from the bottom-right corner of the table.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) between two strings represent?
easy
A. The longest sequence of characters that appear in both strings in the same order, but not necessarily consecutively
B. The longest substring that appears exactly the same in both strings
C. The shortest sequence that can be formed from both strings
D. The total number of characters in both strings combined
Solution
Step 1: Understand the definition of LCS
The LCS is about finding a sequence that appears in both strings in the same order, but characters do not need to be next to each other.
Step 2: Differentiate LCS from substring
A substring requires characters to be consecutive, but LCS allows gaps, so it is not necessarily a substring.
Final Answer:
The longest sequence of characters that appear in both strings in the same order, but not necessarily consecutively -> Option A
Quick Check:
LCS means longest common sequence, not substring [OK]
Hint: LCS allows gaps; substring does not [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing LCS with longest common substring
Thinking characters must be consecutive
Assuming LCS is the combined length
2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize a 2D array dp of size (m+1) x (n+1) with zeros in JavaScript for LCS dynamic programming?
easy
A. const dp = Array(m+1).fill(Array(n+1).fill(0));
B. const dp = Array.from({length: m+1}, () => Array(n+1).fill(0));
C. const dp = new Array(m+1).map(new Array(n+1).fill(0));
D. const dp = Array(m+1).map(Array(n+1).fill(0));
Solution
Step 1: Understand how to create independent inner arrays
Using Array.from with a function creates new inner arrays for each row, avoiding shared references.
Step 2: Analyze each option
Array(m+1).fill(Array(n+1).fill(0)) shares the same inner array for all rows, causing bugs. Options C and D pass an array to map() instead of a function, causing a TypeError. Array.from({length: m+1}, () => Array(n+1).fill(0)) correctly creates independent arrays.