Fibonacci Using DP in DSA Javascript - Practice Problems & Challenges

Challenge - 5 Problems

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of Fibonacci with Memoization

What is the output of the following JavaScript code that calculates the 6th Fibonacci number using memoization?

DSA Javascript

function fib(n, memo = {}) {
  if (n <= 1) return n;
  if (memo[n]) return memo[n];
  memo[n] = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);
  return memo[n];
}
console.log(fib(6));

A 21

B 8

C 5

D 13

💡 Hint

Remember that Fibonacci sequence starts with 0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8...

The 6th Fibonacci number (starting from 0) is 8. The function uses memoization to store intermediate results and avoid repeated calculations.

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of Bottom-Up Fibonacci

What will be printed by this bottom-up dynamic programming approach to Fibonacci for n=7?

DSA Javascript

function fib(n) {
  const dp = [0, 1];
  for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
    dp[i] = dp[i - 1] + dp[i - 2];
  }
  return dp[n];
}
console.log(fib(7));

A 21

B 34

C 8

D 13

💡 Hint

Count the Fibonacci sequence starting from 0 index.

The 7th Fibonacci number is 13 in the sequence 0,1,1,2,3,5,8,13.

🧠 Conceptual

advanced

Why Use Memoization in Fibonacci?

Why is memoization important when calculating Fibonacci numbers recursively?

A It stores previously calculated results to avoid repeated work, improving efficiency.

B It changes the Fibonacci sequence to a different series.

C It makes the function run slower by adding extra steps.

D It removes the need for base cases in recursion.

💡 Hint

Think about how many times the same Fibonacci number is calculated without memoization.

Memoization saves results of subproblems so the function does not compute the same Fibonacci number multiple times, reducing time complexity from exponential to linear.

❓ Predict Output

advanced

Output of Fibonacci with Incorrect Memo Check

What is the output of this code that tries to use memoization but has a bug in the memo check?

DSA Javascript

function fib(n, memo = {}) {
  if (n <= 1) return n;
  if (memo[n] !== undefined) return memo[n];
  memo[n] = fib(n - 1, memo) + fib(n - 2, memo);
  return memo[n];
}
console.log(fib(5));

A Stack Overflow error

B undefined

C 5

D TypeError

💡 Hint

Check how memo[n] is checked before returning.

The code correctly checks if memo[n] is not undefined before returning it, so it works fine and returns 5 for fib(5).

❓ Predict Output

expert

Output of Fibonacci with Space Optimization

What is the output of this space-optimized Fibonacci function for n=10?

DSA Javascript

function fib(n) {
  if (n <= 1) return n;
  let a = 0, b = 1, c = 0;
  for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
    c = a + b;
    a = b;
    b = c;
  }
  return c;
}
console.log(fib(10));

A 89

B 34

C 55

D 144

💡 Hint

Recall the Fibonacci sequence values at index 10 starting from 0.

The 10th Fibonacci number is 55. This code uses only three variables to calculate it efficiently.

Practice

1. What is the main advantage of using Dynamic Programming (DP) to calculate Fibonacci numbers compared to a simple recursive approach?

easy

A. It uses less memory by not storing any results

B. It calculates Fibonacci numbers using only recursion without loops

C. It stores intermediate results to avoid repeated calculations

D. It always returns the Fibonacci sequence in reverse order

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand recursion vs DP

   Simple recursion recalculates the same Fibonacci numbers many times, causing inefficiency.

2. Step 2: Role of DP in Fibonacci

   DP stores previously calculated Fibonacci values in a table (memoization or tabulation) to reuse them, avoiding repeated work.

3. Final Answer:

   It stores intermediate results to avoid repeated calculations -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   DP = stores results to save time [OK]

Hint: DP saves time by remembering past answers [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Thinking DP uses less memory than recursion
• Believing DP does not use loops or arrays
• Confusing DP with simple recursion

2. Which of the following JavaScript code snippets correctly initializes an array for bottom-up DP to compute Fibonacci numbers up to n?

easy

A. const fib = new Array(n+1).fill(0); fib[0] = 0; fib[1] = 1;

B. const fib = []; fib[0] = 1; fib[1] = 1;

C. const fib = new Array(n).fill(0); fib[1] = 1;

D. const fib = new Array(n+1).fill(1); fib[0] = 0;

Solution

1. Step 1: Array size for DP

   We need an array of size n+1 to store Fibonacci numbers from 0 to n.

2. Step 2: Initial values for Fibonacci

   Fibonacci sequence starts with fib[0] = 0 and fib[1] = 1, so these must be set correctly.

3. Final Answer:

   const fib = new Array(n+1).fill(0); fib[0] = 0; fib[1] = 1; -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Array size n+1, fib[0]=0, fib[1]=1 [OK]

Hint: Array size n+1 with fib[0]=0 and fib[1]=1 [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using array size n instead of n+1
• Setting fib[0] = 1 incorrectly
• Filling array with 1 instead of 0

3. What will be the output of the following JavaScript code?

function fibDP(n) {
  const fib = [0, 1];
  for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
    fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
  }
  return fib[n];
}
console.log(fibDP(6));

medium

A. 8

B. 13

C. 21

D. 34

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace Fibonacci values up to n=6

   fib[0]=0, fib[1]=1, fib[2]=1, fib[3]=2, fib[4]=3, fib[5]=5, fib[6]=8.

2. Step 2: Return fib[6]

   The function returns fib[6], which is 8.

3. Final Answer:

   8 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   fib(6) = 8 [OK]

Hint: fib(6) = 8 by adding previous two numbers [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing index and value (e.g., fib[6] = 13)
• Starting array with wrong initial values
• Off-by-one errors in loop

4. Identify the error in this JavaScript DP Fibonacci function and choose the correct fix:

function fibDP(n) {
  const fib = [0, 1];
  for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
  }
  return fib[n];
}

medium

A. Remove the loop and use recursion instead

B. Initialize fib array with zeros instead of [0,1]

C. Change return to fib[n-1] to fix off-by-one

D. Change loop start to i = 2 to avoid undefined fib[-1]

Solution

1. Step 1: Analyze loop start index

   The loop starts at i=1, so fib[i-2] becomes fib[-1] which is undefined and causes error.

2. Step 2: Correct loop start

   Starting loop at i=2 ensures fib[i-2] is fib[0], which is defined, fixing the error.

3. Final Answer:

   Change loop start to i = 2 to avoid undefined fib[-1] -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Loop from 2 avoids negative index [OK]

Hint: Start loop at 2 to avoid negative indices [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Starting loop at 1 causing undefined access
• Changing return index incorrectly
• Removing DP and using recursion unnecessarily

5. Given the following code to compute Fibonacci numbers using DP, what will be the output of fibDP(0) and fibDP(1)? How does the function handle these edge cases?

function fibDP(n) {
  if (n <= 1) return n;
  const fib = new Array(n + 1).fill(0);
  fib[1] = 1;
  for (let i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
    fib[i] = fib[i - 1] + fib[i - 2];
  }
  return fib[n];
}

hard

A. fibDP(0) = 1, fibDP(1) = 1; initializes fib array incorrectly

B. fibDP(0) = 0, fibDP(1) = 1; returns n directly for n ≤ 1

C. fibDP(0) = 0, fibDP(1) = 0; misses setting fib[1] properly

D. fibDP(0) and fibDP(1) cause errors due to array size

Solution

1. Step 1: Check base case handling

   The function returns n directly if n ≤ 1, so fibDP(0) returns 0 and fibDP(1) returns 1 immediately.

2. Step 2: Confirm array initialization and loop

   For n > 1, the array is initialized and filled correctly, but for n=0 or 1, the function returns early, handling edge cases properly.

3. Final Answer:

   fibDP(0) = 0, fibDP(1) = 1; returns n directly for n ≤ 1 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Edge cases return n directly [OK]

Hint: Returns n directly for n ≤ 1 to handle edges [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Not handling n=0 or n=1 separately
• Incorrect array initialization for small n
• Assuming loop runs for n=0 or n=1