0 1 Knapsack Problem in DSA Javascript - Time & Space Complexity

Time Complexity: 0 1 Knapsack Problem

O(n * W)

Understanding Time Complexity

We want to understand how the time needed to solve the 0 1 Knapsack Problem changes as we add more items or increase the knapsack capacity.

The question is: How does the work grow when inputs get bigger?

Scenario Under Consideration

Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.

function knapsack(weights, values, capacity) {
  const n = weights.length;
  const dp = Array(n + 1).fill(null).map(() => Array(capacity + 1).fill(0));

  for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    for (let w = 1; w <= capacity; w++) {
      if (weights[i - 1] <= w) {
        dp[i][w] = Math.max(dp[i - 1][w], dp[i - 1][w - weights[i - 1]] + values[i - 1]);
      } else {
        dp[i][w] = dp[i - 1][w];
      }
    }
  }
  return dp[n][capacity];
}
    

This code finds the best total value of items that fit into the knapsack without exceeding its capacity.

Identify Repeating Operations

Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.

• Primary operation: Nested loops over items and capacities.
• How many times: Outer loop runs n times (number of items), inner loop runs capacity times.

How Execution Grows With Input

Each item is checked against every capacity from 1 up to the max capacity, so work grows with both.

Input Size (n items, capacity W)	Approx. Operations
10 items, capacity 50	~ 10 * 50 = 500
100 items, capacity 1000	~ 100 * 1000 = 100,000
1000 items, capacity 10,000	~ 1000 * 10,000 = 10,000,000

Pattern observation: The work grows roughly by multiplying the number of items by the capacity.

Final Time Complexity

Time Complexity: O(n * W)

This means the time needed grows proportionally with both the number of items and the knapsack capacity.

Common Mistake

[X] Wrong: "The time depends only on the number of items, so it is O(n)."

[OK] Correct: The capacity also affects the time because the algorithm checks every capacity value for each item, so both matter.

Interview Connect

Understanding this time complexity helps you explain how dynamic programming solves problems efficiently by breaking them into smaller parts, a skill valued in many coding challenges.

Self-Check

"What if we used recursion with memoization instead of loops? How would the time complexity change?"

Practice

1. What does the 0 1 Knapsack Problem aim to maximize given a set of items with weights and values?

easy

A. The total value of items without exceeding the weight limit

B. The total weight of items without exceeding the value limit

C. The number of items selected regardless of weight

D. The minimum weight of items selected

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the problem goal

   The 0 1 Knapsack Problem tries to select items to maximize total value without exceeding the weight capacity.

2. Step 2: Identify the constraint

   The total weight of selected items must not exceed the knapsack's weight limit.

3. Final Answer:

   The total value of items without exceeding the weight limit -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Maximize value with weight limit = B [OK]

Hint: Remember: maximize value, not weight or count [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing weight limit with value limit
• Thinking the problem maximizes number of items
• Ignoring the weight constraint

2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize the DP array for the 0 1 Knapsack Problem in JavaScript?

easy

A. const dp = new Array(n + 1).fill(new Array(W + 1).fill(0));

B. const dp = Array(n + 1).fill(Array(W + 1).fill(0));

C. const dp = Array.from({ length: n + 1 }, () => Array(W + 1).fill(0));

D. const dp = Array(n).fill(Array(W).fill(0));

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand DP array initialization

   We need a 2D array where each row is a separate array to avoid reference issues.

2. Step 2: Choose correct initialization

   Using Array.from with a function creates independent inner arrays, preventing shared references.

3. Final Answer:

   const dp = Array.from({ length: n + 1 }, () => Array(W + 1).fill(0)); -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Independent inner arrays = A [OK]

Hint: Use Array.from with function to avoid shared references [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using fill with array directly causing shared references
• Initializing with wrong dimensions
• Forgetting to fill inner arrays

3. What is the output of the following code snippet for weights = [1, 3, 4], values = [15, 50, 60], and W = 5?

function knapsack(weights, values, W) {
  const n = weights.length;
  const dp = Array.from({ length: n + 1 }, () => Array(W + 1).fill(0));
  for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    for (let w = 1; w <= W; w++) {
      if (weights[i - 1] <= w) {
        dp[i][w] = Math.max(dp[i - 1][w], dp[i - 1][w - weights[i - 1]] + values[i - 1]);
      } else {
        dp[i][w] = dp[i - 1][w];
      }
    }
  }
  return dp[n][W];
}

console.log(knapsack([1, 3, 4], [15, 50, 60], 5));

medium

A. 65

B. 80

C. 60

D. 75

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace DP table filling

   Check items one by one and weights up to 5:
   - Item 1 (weight 1, value 15): dp[1][1..5] = 15
   - Item 2 (weight 3, value 50): dp[2][3] = max(15, 0+50)=50, dp[2][4]=max(15,15+50)=65, dp[2][5]=max(15,15+50)=65
   - Item 3 (weight 4, value 60): dp[3][4]=max(65,0+60)=65, dp[3][5]=max(65,15+60)=75

2. Step 2: Find final answer

   The maximum value for weight 5 is dp[3][5] = 75.

3. Final Answer:

   75 -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Max value at W=5 = 75 [OK]

Hint: Trace DP table row by row for each item [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Adding values without checking weight limit
• Confusing indices in dp array
• Forgetting to compare including vs excluding item

4. Identify the bug in this 0 1 Knapsack implementation and select the fix:

function knapsack(weights, values, W) {
  const n = weights.length;
  const dp = Array.from({ length: n + 1 }, () => Array(W + 1).fill(0));
  for (let i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
    for (let w = 1; w <= W; w++) {
      if (weights[i] <= w) {
        dp[i][w] = Math.max(dp[i - 1][w], dp[i - 1][w - weights[i]] + values[i]);
      } else {
        dp[i][w] = dp[i - 1][w];
      }
    }
  }
  return dp[n][W];
}

medium

A. Change weights[i] and values[i] to weights[i - 1] and values[i - 1]

B. Change loop to start i from 0 instead of 1

C. Initialize dp with zeros using fill(1)

D. Change inner loop to run from w = 0 to W - 1

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify index error in array access

   Arrays in JavaScript are zero-indexed, but loop starts at 1, so weights[i] accesses out-of-bound or wrong element.

2. Step 2: Correct index usage

   Use weights[i - 1] and values[i - 1] to access correct item corresponding to dp row i.

3. Final Answer:

   Change weights[i] and values[i] to weights[i - 1] and values[i - 1] -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Fix index offset = D [OK]

Hint: Remember dp row i corresponds to item i-1 [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using wrong indices causing undefined values
• Changing loop start incorrectly
• Incorrect dp initialization

5. Given items with weights = [2, 3, 5, 7], values = [10, 5, 15, 7], and knapsack capacity W = 10, which set of items maximizes value without exceeding weight? Select the correct maximum value.
Note: You can only take each item once.

hard

A. 25

B. 30

C. 27

D. 22

Solution

1. Step 1: Consider all item combinations within weight limit 10

   Possible combinations:
   - Items 1,2,3: weights 2+3+5=10, values 10+5+15=30 (exceeds capacity? No, equals 10)
   - Items 1,3,4: weights 2+5+7=14 (exceeds 10)
   - Items 2,3,4: weights 3+5+7=15 (exceeds 10)
   - Items 1,4: weights 2+7=9, values 10+7=17
   - Items 3 alone: weight 5, value 15
   - Items 1,2,4: weights 2+3+7=12 (exceeds 10)

2. Step 2: Find max value without exceeding weight

   Best valid combination is items 1,2,3 with total weight 10 and value 30. But since weight is exactly 10, it's valid.
   Check if any other combination gives more value:
   Items 1,3: weight 7, value 25
   Items 3,4: weight 12 (exceeds)
   So max value is 30.

3. Final Answer:

   30 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Max value with W=10 = 30 [OK]

Hint: Try all combos within weight limit to find max value [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Ignoring exact weight limit equality
• Adding values of items exceeding capacity
• Missing best combination