What is the main idea behind using a stack to solve the Trapping Rain Water problem?
Use a stack to keep track of bars that are bounded by higher bars on both sides. When a higher bar is found, calculate trapped water using the distance and height difference between bars.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the Trapping Rain Water problem, what does each element in the stack represent?
Each element in the stack represents the index of a bar in the elevation map that is waiting to find a right boundary to trap water.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we pop from the stack when the current bar height is greater than the height of the bar at the top of the stack?
Because a higher bar on the right can form a boundary to trap water with the bar below the popped bar, allowing calculation of trapped water volume.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the Trapping Rain Water solution using a stack?
O(n), because each bar is pushed and popped at most once from the stack.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What happens if the stack is empty when trying to calculate trapped water?
No trapped water can be calculated because there is no left boundary to form a container.
Click to reveal answer
What does the stack store in the Trapping Rain Water problem?
ADistances between bars
BHeights of bars
CWater volumes
DIndices of bars
✗ Incorrect
The stack stores indices of bars to help calculate trapped water using their positions and heights.
When do we calculate trapped water in the stack approach?
AWhen current bar is lower than top of stack
BWhen current bar is higher than top of stack
CWhen stack is empty
DAt the end of the array only
✗ Incorrect
Trapped water is calculated when the current bar is higher than the bar at the top of the stack.
What does the distance between bars represent in trapped water calculation?
ATotal water volume
BHeight of trapped water
CWidth of trapped water container
DStack size
✗ Incorrect
Distance between bars represents the width of the container holding trapped water.
What is the space complexity of the stack solution?
AO(n)
BO(log n)
CO(1)
DO(n^2)
✗ Incorrect
The stack can hold up to n indices, so space complexity is O(n).
If the stack is empty, what does it mean for trapped water calculation?
ANo left boundary exists
BWater can be trapped
CWater volume is maximum
DStack error
✗ Incorrect
An empty stack means no left boundary to trap water.
Explain step-by-step how the stack helps calculate trapped rain water in the elevation map.
Think about how boundaries form containers for water.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why the stack approach is efficient for the Trapping Rain Water problem compared to brute force.
Focus on how the stack reduces repeated work.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a stack in the Trapping Rain Water Using Stack algorithm?
easy
A. To store the total amount of trapped water directly
B. To keep track of bars that are not yet processed for water trapping
C. To sort the heights of bars in ascending order
D. To reverse the array of bar heights
Solution
Step 1: Understand the role of stack in the algorithm
The stack stores indices of bars that are waiting to find a right boundary to trap water.
Step 2: Clarify what the stack does not do
The stack does not store water amounts or sort bars; it helps find boundaries for trapped water.
Final Answer:
To keep track of bars that are not yet processed for water trapping -> Option B
Quick Check:
Stack tracks bars for trapping water [OK]
Hint: Stack holds indices of bars waiting for right boundary [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking stack stores water volume directly
Assuming stack sorts the bars
Believing stack reverses the array
2. Which of the following is the correct way to initialize an empty stack in JavaScript for the trapping rain water problem?
easy
A. const stack = [];
B. const stack = {};
C. const stack = null;
D. const stack = new Stack();
Solution
Step 1: Identify the correct data structure for stack in JavaScript
JavaScript uses arrays as stacks by pushing and popping elements.
Step 2: Check each option
const stack = []; initializes an empty array, which works as a stack. const stack = {}; is an object, not a stack. const stack = null; is null, no stack. const stack = new Stack(); assumes a Stack class which is not built-in.
Final Answer:
const stack = []; -> Option A
Quick Check:
Empty array for stack [OK]
Hint: Use empty array [] as stack in JavaScript [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using object {} instead of array
Assuming Stack class exists by default
Initializing stack as null
3. What will be the output of the following code snippet that uses stack to calculate trapped rain water?
const height = [0,1,0,2,1,0,1,3,2,1,2,1];
function trap(height) {
let stack = [];
let water = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < height.length; i++) {
while (stack.length && height[i] > height[stack[stack.length - 1]]) {
let top = stack.pop();
if (!stack.length) break;
let distance = i - stack[stack.length - 1] - 1;
let boundedHeight = Math.min(height[i], height[stack[stack.length - 1]]) - height[top];
water += distance * boundedHeight;
}
stack.push(i);
}
return water;
}
console.log(trap(height));
medium
A. 6
B. 5
C. 7
D. 8
Solution
Step 1: Understand the input and algorithm flow
The input array represents bar heights. The stack-based algorithm calculates trapped water by finding boundaries and distances.
Step 2: Trace the code logic mentally
The code correctly calculates trapped water for the given heights, which is a classic example resulting in 6 units of water trapped.
Final Answer:
6 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Classic trapping rain water example = 6 [OK]
Hint: Classic example height array traps 6 units water [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Miscounting trapped water units
Ignoring stack empty check
Wrong distance or bounded height calculation
4. Identify the error in the following code snippet for trapping rain water using stack:
function trap(height) {
let stack = [];
let water = 0;
for (let i = 0; i < height.length; i++) {
while (stack.length && height[i] >= height[stack[stack.length - 1]]) {
let top = stack.pop();
if (!stack.length) break;
let distance = i - stack[stack.length - 1] - 1;
let boundedHeight = Math.min(height[i], height[stack[stack.length - 1]]) - height[top];
water += distance * boundedHeight;
}
stack.push(i);
}
return water;
}
medium
A. The distance calculation is incorrect
B. The stack should be initialized as an object, not array
C. The comparison should be >, not >= in the while condition
D. The water variable should be reset inside the loop
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the while loop condition
The condition uses >= which causes incorrect popping when heights are equal, leading to wrong trapped water calculation.
Step 2: Correct the condition
Changing >= to > ensures only strictly higher bars trigger popping, preserving correct boundaries.
Final Answer:
The comparison should be >, not >= in the while condition -> Option C
Quick Check:
Use > in while condition to avoid wrong pops [OK]
Hint: Use >, not >=, to avoid popping equal height bars [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using >= causes incorrect water calculation
Initializing stack as object instead of array
Resetting water inside loop wrongly
5. Given the heights array [4, 2, 0, 3, 2, 5], what is the total trapped rain water calculated using the stack method?
hard
A. 6
B. 7
C. 8
D. 9
Solution
Step 1: Visualize the bars and trapped water
Bars heights: 4,2,0,3,2,5. Water trapped between bars is calculated by stack method considering boundaries and distances.
Step 2: Calculate trapped water step-by-step
Water at index 1: 2, index 2: 4, index 3: 1, index 4: 2, total 9 units.
Final Answer:
9 -> Option D
Quick Check:
Sum trapped water units = 9 [OK]
Hint: Sum water between boundaries carefully for correct total [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Miscounting trapped water units
Ignoring zero height bars
Wrong boundary identification
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.