What does the 'Reorder Linked List' problem ask you to do?
It asks to rearrange a linked list so that nodes are ordered as first node, last node, second node, second last node, and so on.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Which three main steps are used to solve the Reorder Linked List problem?
1. Find the middle of the list. 2. Reverse the second half. 3. Merge the two halves alternating nodes.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How do you find the middle of a linked list efficiently?
Use two pointers: a slow pointer moves one step at a time, a fast pointer moves two steps. When fast reaches the end, slow is at the middle.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why do we reverse the second half of the linked list in this problem?
Reversing the second half lets us easily merge nodes from the end of the list with nodes from the start in alternating order.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the Reorder Linked List algorithm?
The time complexity is O(n) because each step (finding middle, reversing, merging) processes nodes linearly once.
Click to reveal answer
What is the first step in the Reorder Linked List algorithm?
AReverse the entire list
BMerge two lists
CFind the middle of the list
DDelete the last node
✗ Incorrect
The first step is to find the middle of the list using two pointers.
Why do we use two pointers moving at different speeds?
ATo delete nodes
BTo reverse the list
CTo merge two lists
DTo find the middle node efficiently
✗ Incorrect
Two pointers moving at different speeds help find the middle node in one pass.
After finding the middle, what do we do next?
AReverse the second half of the list
BDelete the first half
CSort the list
DAdd new nodes
✗ Incorrect
We reverse the second half to prepare for merging in alternating order.
What is the final step in the Reorder Linked List algorithm?
ADelete the middle node
BMerge the two halves alternating nodes
CReverse the entire list
DFind the middle again
✗ Incorrect
The final step is merging nodes from the first and reversed second half alternately.
What is the overall time complexity of the Reorder Linked List solution?
AO(n)
BO(n^2)
CO(log n)
DO(1)
✗ Incorrect
Each step processes nodes linearly, so the total time is O(n).
Explain the three main steps to reorder a linked list in the required pattern.
Think about splitting the list, flipping part of it, then weaving nodes together.
You got /3 concepts.
Describe how the two-pointer technique helps in solving the Reorder Linked List problem.
One pointer moves twice as fast as the other.
You got /3 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main goal of the Reorder Linked List problem?
easy
A. Rearrange the list so nodes alternate from start and end towards the center
B. Sort the linked list in ascending order
C. Reverse the entire linked list
D. Remove duplicate nodes from the linked list
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem goal
The problem asks to reorder nodes so the first node is followed by the last node, then second node, then second last, and so on.
Step 2: Differentiate from other operations
This is not sorting or reversing the whole list, but alternating nodes from front and back.
Final Answer:
Rearrange the list so nodes alternate from start and end towards the center -> Option A
Quick Check:
Reorder Linked List = Alternate front and back nodes [OK]
Hint: Think of weaving nodes from front and back alternately [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing reorder with sorting
Trying to reverse the entire list only
Ignoring the alternating pattern
2. Which of the following code snippets correctly finds the middle node of a singly linked list in JavaScript?
easy
A. let slow = head; let fast = head.next; while(fast) { slow = slow.next; fast = fast.next; }
B. let slow = head; while(slow.next) { slow = slow.next.next; }
C. let fast = head; while(fast.next) { fast = fast.next.next; }
D. let slow = head, fast = head; while(fast && fast.next) { slow = slow.next; fast = fast.next.next; }
Solution
Step 1: Use two pointers to find middle
Initialize two pointers: slow moves one step, fast moves two steps until fast reaches end.
Step 2: Check each option
let slow = head, fast = head; while(fast && fast.next) { slow = slow.next; fast = fast.next.next; } correctly moves slow by one and fast by two steps in the loop condition.
Final Answer:
let slow = head, fast = head; while(fast && fast.next) { slow = slow.next; fast = fast.next.next; } -> Option D
Quick Check:
Fast moves twice, slow moves once to find middle [OK]
Hint: Use slow and fast pointers; fast moves twice as fast [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Moving slow pointer incorrectly
Not checking fast and fast.next in loop condition
Starting fast pointer incorrectly
3. Given the linked list 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> null, what will be the reordered list after applying the reorder algorithm?
medium
A. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> null
B. 4 -> 3 -> 2 -> 1 -> null
C. 1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 3 -> null
D. 1 -> 3 -> 2 -> 4 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Identify the reorder pattern
The reorder pattern is first node, last node, second node, second last node, and so on.
Step 2: Apply pattern to list 1->2->3->4
Start with 1, then 4, then 2, then 3, resulting in 1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 3 -> null.
Final Answer:
1 -> 4 -> 2 -> 3 -> null -> Option C
Quick Check:
Alternate front and back nodes = 1->4->2->3 [OK]
Hint: Alternate nodes from front and back to reorder [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Reversing the entire list instead
Not alternating nodes correctly
Leaving list unchanged
4. Consider this buggy code snippet for reordering a linked list:
function reorderList(head) {
if (!head) return;
let slow = head, fast = head;
while (fast.next && fast.next.next) {
slow = slow.next;
fast = fast.next.next;
}
let second = slow.next;
slow.next = null;
second = reverseList(second);
let first = head;
while (second) {
let temp1 = first.next;
let temp2 = second.next;
first.next = second;
second.next = temp1;
first = temp1;
second = temp2;
}
}
function reverseList(head) {
let prev = null;
while (head) {
let next = head.next;
head.next = prev;
prev = head;
head = next;
}
return prev;
}
What is the bug in this code?
medium
A. The merging loop does not handle the case when first becomes null
B. The loop condition for finding middle is incorrect and may skip nodes
C. The reverseList function does not return the reversed list
D. The slow pointer is not moved correctly to split the list
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the merging loop
The merging loop assumes first is never null, but if first becomes null before second, it causes errors.
Step 2: Identify missing null check
There is no check if first is null before accessing first.next, which can cause runtime errors.
Final Answer:
The merging loop does not handle the case when first becomes null -> Option A
Quick Check:
Merging loop must check first != null to avoid errors [OK]
Hint: Check null before accessing next pointers in merge loop [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring null checks in merging loop
Thinking reverseList is faulty
Misreading middle finding loop condition
5. You have a linked list with nodes: 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null. After reordering, what will be the final linked list?
hard
A. 5 -> 4 -> 3 -> 2 -> 1 -> null
B. 1 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> 3 -> null
C. 1 -> 3 -> 5 -> 2 -> 4 -> null
D. 1 -> 2 -> 3 -> 4 -> 5 -> null
Solution
Step 1: Understand reorder pattern for odd length list
For odd length, reorder as first node, last node, second node, second last node, then middle node.