Start with empty array []. push(10) => [10] unshift(20) => [20, 10] push(30) => [20, 10, 30] shift() removes front element 20 => [10, 30]
Step 2: Final state of dq
After all operations, dq contains [10, 30].
Final Answer:
[10, 30] -> Option A
Quick Check:
After shift(), front 20 removed, left [10, 30] [OK]
Hint: Track each push/unshift/shift step carefully [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Forgetting shift() removes front element
Mixing order of push and unshift effects
Assuming shift() removes last element
4. Identify the error in the following code snippet that tries to remove an element from the rear of a deque implemented as an array named dq:
dq.removeLast();
medium
A. dq.pop() should be used instead of removeLast().
B. removeLast() is not a valid JavaScript array method.
C. removeLast() requires an argument to specify the element.
D. dq should be a linked list to use removeLast().
Solution
Step 1: Check JavaScript array methods for removing last element
JavaScript arrays do not have a method named removeLast(). The correct method to remove the last element is pop().
Step 2: Analyze other options
Linked list is unrelated here; removeLast() does not take arguments; pop() is the correct method.
Final Answer:
removeLast() is not a valid JavaScript array method. -> Option B
Quick Check:
pop() removes last element, removeLast() invalid [OK]
Hint: Use pop() to remove last element in JS array [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Assuming removeLast() exists in JS arrays
Trying to pass arguments to pop() or removeLast()
Confusing linked list methods with array methods
5. You want to implement a deque that supports the following operations efficiently: addFront, addRear, removeFront, removeRear. Which data structure is best suited for this and why?
hard
A. Array, because it allows fast insertion and deletion at both ends.
B. Stack, because it supports adding and removing elements efficiently.
C. Singly linked list, because it allows fast insertion and deletion at both ends.
D. Doubly linked list, because it allows fast insertion and deletion at both ends without shifting elements.
Solution
Step 1: Analyze operation requirements
We need fast insertion and deletion at both front and rear ends.
Step 2: Compare data structures
Array requires shifting elements for front operations, making it inefficient. Singly linked list allows fast insertion/removal only at one end efficiently. Doubly linked list allows fast insertion/removal at both ends without shifting. Stack supports operations only at one end.
Final Answer:
Doubly linked list, because it allows fast insertion and deletion at both ends without shifting elements. -> Option D
Quick Check:
Doubly linked list = best for deque operations [OK]
Hint: Use doubly linked list for efficient double-ended ops [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Choosing array ignoring shifting cost
Assuming singly linked list supports both ends efficiently
Confusing stack with deque
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.