What if you could instantly know if a jumbled sentence makes sense without guessing every split?
Why Word Break Problem in DSA Java?
Imagine you have a long sentence without spaces, like "applepenapple", and you want to find out if it can be split into valid words from a dictionary, such as "apple" and "pen".
Doing this by checking every possible split manually is like trying to guess where to put spaces without any clues.
Manually trying all splits is slow and confusing because the number of ways to split grows very fast as the sentence gets longer.
You might miss some valid splits or waste time checking impossible ones.
The Word Break Problem uses a smart way to remember which parts of the sentence can be split successfully, so you don't repeat work.
This method quickly tells you if the whole sentence can be formed by dictionary words.
boolean canBreak(String s, Set<String> dict) {
if (s.length() == 0) return true;
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length(); i++) {
String left = s.substring(0, i);
String right = s.substring(i);
if (dict.contains(left) && canBreak(right, dict)) {
return true;
}
}
return false;
}boolean canBreak(String s, Set<String> dict) {
boolean[] dp = new boolean[s.length() + 1];
dp[0] = true;
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length(); i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && dict.contains(s.substring(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length()];
}This lets you quickly check if a sentence can be split into valid words, enabling applications like spell checking, text segmentation, and autocomplete.
When you type a sentence without spaces in a search engine or messaging app, the system uses this to guess where the words are, so it understands your message correctly.
Manual splitting is slow and error-prone.
Dynamic programming remembers valid splits to avoid repeated work.
Efficiently checks if a sentence can be formed from dictionary words.
Practice
Word Break Problem in algorithms?Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem statement
The Word Break Problem asks if a given string can be split into one or more words found in a dictionary.Step 2: Identify the goal
The goal is to verify if such segmentation is possible, not to count or reverse characters.Final Answer:
To check if a string can be segmented into valid dictionary words -> Option AQuick Check:
Word Break Problem = Check segmentation [OK]
- Confusing with string reversal
- Thinking it counts vowels
- Assuming it finds longest word
Solution
Step 1: Identify expected return type
The Word Break Problem returns true or false, so return type should be boolean.Step 2: Check parameter types
The input string is String, and dictionary can be List or Set of strings. public boolean wordBreak(String s, List<String> wordDict) uses List<String> and boolean return, which is correct.Final Answer:
public boolean wordBreak(String s, List<String> wordDict) -> Option BQuick Check:
Return type boolean + List parameter = public boolean wordBreak(String s, List<String> wordDict) [OK]
- Using int or void as return type
- Returning String instead of boolean
- Using wrong parameter types
import java.util.*;
public class Solution {
public static boolean wordBreak(String s, List<String> wordDict) {
boolean[] dp = new boolean[s.length() + 1];
dp[0] = true;
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length(); i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && wordDict.contains(s.substring(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length()];
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
List<String> dict = Arrays.asList("leet", "code");
System.out.println(wordBreak("leetcode", dict));
}
}Solution
Step 1: Understand the dynamic programming logic
The dp array tracks if substring up to index i can be segmented. Initially dp[0] = true.Step 2: Trace the input "leetcode" with dictionary ["leet", "code"]
"leet" matches s[0:4], so dp[4] = true. Then "code" matches s[4:8], so dp[8] = true. Hence, dp[s.length()] = true.Final Answer:
true -> Option AQuick Check:
"leetcode" segmented = true [OK]
- Assuming false because of substring indexing
- Confusing dp array meaning
- Ignoring break after setting dp[i]
public boolean wordBreak(String s, List<String> wordDict) {
boolean[] dp = new boolean[s.length()];
dp[0] = true;
for (int i = 1; i <= s.length(); i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (dp[j] && wordDict.contains(s.substring(j, i))) {
dp[i] = true;
break;
}
}
}
return dp[s.length()];
}Solution
Step 1: Check dp array size and indexing
The dp array must have length s.length() + 1 to include dp[0] and dp[s.length()] indices.Step 2: Identify impact of incorrect dp size
With size s.length(), dp[s.length()] access causes ArrayIndexOutOfBoundsException.Final Answer:
dp array size should be s.length() + 1 -> Option CQuick Check:
dp size = s.length()+1 fixes index error [OK]
- Setting dp[0] false breaks base case
- Misusing substring indices
- Thinking List vs Set causes error here
["apple", "pen", "applepen", "pine", "pineapple"], which of the following strings can be segmented into dictionary words using the Word Break algorithm?Solution
Step 1: Analyze string "pineapplepenapple" segmentation
It can be segmented as "pine" + "apple" + "pen" + "apple" or "pineapple" + "pen" + "apple" all in dictionary.Step 2: Check other options for invalid segments
The strings in A, B, and C contain substrings like "pens" or "apples" that cannot be segmented using the dictionary words (e.g., A and C end with "pens", B ends with "apples"). Only D can be fully segmented.Final Answer:
"pineapplepenapple" -> Option DQuick Check:
Valid segmentation = "pineapplepenapple" [OK]
- Assuming plural forms are valid
- Ignoring order of words
- Not verifying full segmentation
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
