It is the problem of finding the longest sequence of characters that appears in the same order and contiguously in two given strings.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How does dynamic programming help solve the Longest Common Substring problem?
Dynamic programming stores lengths of common substrings ending at each pair of indices, building up solutions from smaller substrings to find the longest one efficiently.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the DP table for Longest Common Substring, what does each cell represent?
Each cell represents the length of the longest common substring ending at the corresponding characters of the two strings.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the standard dynamic programming solution for Longest Common Substring?
The time complexity is O(m * n), where m and n are the lengths of the two input strings.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why is Longest Common Substring different from Longest Common Subsequence?
Longest Common Substring requires the matching characters to be contiguous, while Longest Common Subsequence allows characters to be non-contiguous but in order.
Click to reveal answer
What does the Longest Common Substring problem find?
AThe longest contiguous matching sequence in two strings
BThe longest sequence of characters in order but not necessarily contiguous
CThe total number of matching characters
DThe shortest substring in both strings
✗ Incorrect
Longest Common Substring finds the longest contiguous matching sequence in two strings.
In the DP solution, what happens when characters at current indices do not match?
AThe DP cell increments by 1
BThe DP cell copies the previous cell value
CThe DP cell is ignored
DThe DP cell is set to 0
✗ Incorrect
When characters do not match, the length of common substring ending there is 0.
What is the space complexity of the standard DP approach for Longest Common Substring?
AO(1)
BO(m + n)
CO(m * n)
DO(max(m, n))
✗ Incorrect
The DP table requires O(m * n) space to store substring lengths.
Which of these is true about Longest Common Substring?
AIt ignores character order
BCharacters must be contiguous in both strings
CIt always equals the length of the shorter string
DCharacters can be scattered in both strings
✗ Incorrect
Longest Common Substring requires contiguous characters in both strings.
If two strings have no common substring, what is the result?
A0
B1
CLength of shorter string
DLength of longer string
✗ Incorrect
No common substring means the longest length is 0.
Explain how to use dynamic programming to find the Longest Common Substring between two strings.
Think about building solutions from smaller substrings and storing results.
You got /6 concepts.
Describe the difference between Longest Common Substring and Longest Common Subsequence.
Focus on continuity and order of characters.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Longest Common Substring problem find between two strings s1 and s2?
easy
A. The total number of common characters between the two strings
B. The longest sequence of characters that appear in any order in both strings
C. The longest sequence of characters that appear only in the first string
D. The longest sequence of characters that appear consecutively in both strings
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem definition
The Longest Common Substring problem looks for the longest continuous sequence of characters that appear exactly the same and consecutively in both strings.
Step 2: Compare options with the definition
The longest sequence of characters that appear consecutively in both strings correctly describes this as a consecutive sequence. Options B and C describe subsequences or counts, not substrings. The longest sequence of characters that appear only in the first string is unrelated.
Final Answer:
The longest sequence of characters that appear consecutively in both strings -> Option D
Quick Check:
Longest Common Substring = Consecutive matching sequence [OK]
Hint: Longest Common Substring means continuous matching characters [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing substring with subsequence
Thinking order does not matter
Counting total common characters instead
2. Which of the following Java code snippets correctly initializes a 2D array dp for Longest Common Substring of size m+1 by n+1?
easy
A. int[][] dp = new int[m][n];
B. int[][] dp = new int[m+1][n+1];
C. int dp[][] = new int[m-1][n-1];
D. int dp[][] = new int[m+1];
Solution
Step 1: Understand array size for DP table
For Longest Common Substring, we use a DP table of size (m+1) x (n+1) to handle empty prefixes of both strings.
Step 2: Check each option's correctness
int[][] dp = new int[m+1][n+1]; correctly creates a 2D array with dimensions m+1 and n+1. int[][] dp = new int[m][n]; misses the +1, int dp[][] = new int[m-1][n-1]; uses m-1 and n-1 which is invalid, and int dp[][] = new int[m+1]; creates a 1D array.
Final Answer:
int[][] dp = new int[m+1][n+1]; -> Option B
Quick Check:
DP array size = (m+1) x (n+1) [OK]
Hint: DP table size is string lengths plus one for empty prefix [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using wrong array dimensions without +1
Declaring 1D array instead of 2D
Using negative or zero sizes
3. What is the output of the following Java code snippet?
String s1 = "abcdxyz";
String s2 = "xyzabcd";
int m = s1.length();
int n = s2.length();
int[][] dp = new int[m+1][n+1];
int maxLen = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
if (s1.charAt(i-1) == s2.charAt(j-1)) {
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1;
maxLen = Math.max(maxLen, dp[i][j]);
} else {
dp[i][j] = 0;
}
}
}
System.out.println(maxLen);
medium
A. 4
B. 3
C. 1
D. 0
Solution
Step 1: Understand the strings and DP logic
s1 = "abcdxyz", s2 = "xyzabcd". The code finds the longest common substring length using DP.
Step 2: Trace the longest common substring
The longest common substring is "abcd" which appears consecutively in both strings (s1[0-3], s2[3-6]). Its length is 4. "xyz" appears consecutively with length 3.
4. The following code attempts to find the longest common substring length but has a bug. What is the bug?
String s1 = "abcde";
String s2 = "abfde";
int m = s1.length();
int n = s2.length();
int[][] dp = new int[m+1][n+1];
int maxLen = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= m; i++) {
for (int j = 1; j <= n; j++) {
if (s1.charAt(i) == s2.charAt(j)) {
dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1;
maxLen = Math.max(maxLen, dp[i][j]);
} else {
dp[i][j] = 0;
}
}
}
System.out.println(maxLen);
medium
A. maxLen is not updated correctly
B. DP array size is too small
C. Index out of bounds due to incorrect charAt indices
D. The else block should not reset dp[i][j] to zero
Solution
Step 1: Check charAt indices usage
In Java, string indices start at 0, but the loop runs i and j from 1 to length. Using s1.charAt(i) and s2.charAt(j) causes index out of bounds when i or j equals length.
Step 2: Correct index usage
Indices should be i-1 and j-1 to access characters correctly inside the loop.
Final Answer:
Index out of bounds due to incorrect charAt indices -> Option C
Quick Check:
charAt indices must be i-1, j-1 [OK]
Hint: Use i-1 and j-1 for string charAt in DP loops [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using i and j directly as string indices
Not adjusting for zero-based indexing
Ignoring array bounds errors
5. Given two strings s1 = "banana" and s2 = "ananas", which of the following Java methods correctly returns the longest common substring length?
hard
A. Use nested loops with DP, update dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1 if chars match, else 0, track maxLen
B. Use nested loops, increment dp[i][j] by 1 on mismatch, else reset to 0
C. Use nested loops, update dp[i][j] = dp[i][j-1] + 1 if chars match
D. Use nested loops, count total matching characters without resetting dp
Solution
Step 1: Recall DP approach for Longest Common Substring
We use a 2D DP array where dp[i][j] stores length of longest common substring ending at s1[i-1] and s2[j-1]. If characters match, dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1; else 0.
Step 2: Evaluate each option
Use nested loops with DP, update dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1 if chars match, else 0, track maxLen correctly describes this approach. Options A, C, and D describe incorrect logic that does not reset on mismatch or use wrong indices.
Final Answer:
Use nested loops with DP, update dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1 if chars match, else 0, track maxLen -> Option A
Quick Check:
DP update with reset on mismatch = correct method [OK]
Hint: Reset DP cell to zero on mismatch, add 1 on match [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not resetting DP cell to zero on mismatch
Using wrong DP update formula
Counting subsequence instead of substring
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.