What is the main goal of the Merge Overlapping Intervals algorithm?
To combine all intervals that overlap into a single continuous interval, so that no intervals in the result overlap.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we sort intervals by their start time before merging?
Sorting by start time helps us easily find overlapping intervals by comparing each interval with the previous merged interval.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In the Merge Overlapping Intervals algorithm, what do you do when the current interval does NOT overlap with the last merged interval?
You add the current interval as a new separate interval in the merged list because it does not overlap.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What happens when the current interval overlaps with the last merged interval?
You merge them by updating the end of the last merged interval to the maximum end of both intervals.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the Merge Overlapping Intervals algorithm and why?
O(n log n) because sorting the intervals takes O(n log n) time, and merging them in one pass takes O(n) time.
Click to reveal answer
What is the first step in merging overlapping intervals?
ASort intervals by their start time
BSort intervals by their end time
CReverse the intervals
DRemove all intervals
✗ Incorrect
Sorting intervals by their start time helps to easily detect overlaps in one pass.
If interval A is [1, 5] and interval B is [6, 8], what should you do when merging?
AKeep both intervals separate
BMerge into [1, 8]
CDiscard interval B
DDiscard interval A
✗ Incorrect
Since [1, 5] and [6, 8] do not overlap, both intervals remain separate.
When two intervals overlap, how do you update the merged interval?
ARemove the merged interval
BSet end to minimum of both ends
CSet start to maximum of both starts
DSet end to maximum of both ends
✗ Incorrect
The merged interval's end is the maximum end to cover both intervals.
What data structure is commonly used to store merged intervals during the process?
AStack
BQueue
CList or ArrayList
DHashMap
✗ Incorrect
A list or ArrayList is used to store merged intervals in order.
What is the overall time complexity of the Merge Overlapping Intervals algorithm?
AO(n)
BO(n log n)
CO(log n)
DO(n^2)
✗ Incorrect
Sorting takes O(n log n), merging takes O(n), so total is O(n log n).
Explain step-by-step how to merge overlapping intervals given a list of intervals.
Think about sorting first, then checking overlaps one by one.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe why sorting intervals is important before merging and what could go wrong if you skip sorting.
Consider how unordered intervals affect overlap detection.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of merging overlapping intervals in a list of intervals?
easy
A. To combine intervals that overlap into a single continuous interval
B. To sort intervals by their length
C. To remove all intervals that have the same start point
D. To find the interval with the maximum end value
Solution
Step 1: Understand overlapping intervals
Overlapping intervals share some common range, so merging combines them into one continuous interval.
Step 2: Purpose of merging
Merging reduces multiple overlapping intervals into fewer intervals without overlaps, simplifying the list.
Final Answer:
To combine intervals that overlap into a single continuous interval -> Option A
Quick Check:
Merging = Combine overlaps [OK]
Hint: Merging means joining overlapping intervals into one [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking merging sorts intervals by length
Confusing merging with removing duplicates
Assuming merging finds max end only
2. Which of the following Java code snippets correctly sorts a list of intervals by their start time before merging?
easy
A. Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.start - b.start);
B. intervals.sort((a, b) -> b.start - a.start);
C. Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.end - b.end);
D. intervals.sort((a, b) -> a.length() - b.length());
Solution
Step 1: Identify sorting by start time ascending
We need to sort intervals by their start value in ascending order for merging.
Step 2: Check each option
Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.start - b.start); sorts by start ascending correctly. intervals.sort((a, b) -> b.start - a.start); sorts descending. Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.end - b.end); sorts by end, not start. intervals.sort((a, b) -> a.length() - b.length()); sorts by length, which is incorrect.
Final Answer:
Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.start - b.start); -> Option A
Quick Check:
Sort by start ascending = Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.start - b.start); [OK]
Hint: Sort intervals by start ascending before merging [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Sorting by end time instead of start time
Sorting in descending order
Sorting by interval length
3. What is the output of the following Java code that merges overlapping intervals?
List<Interval> intervals = List.of(new Interval(1,3), new Interval(2,6), new Interval(8,10), new Interval(15,18));
List<Interval> merged = mergeIntervals(intervals);
for (Interval i : merged) {
System.out.print("[" + i.start + "," + i.end + "] ");
}
Assume mergeIntervals merges intervals correctly.
medium
A. [1,3] [2,6] [8,10] [15,18]
B. [1,6] [2,6] [8,10] [15,18]
C. [1,6] [8,10] [15,18]
D. [1,3] [8,10] [15,18]
Solution
Step 1: Identify overlapping intervals
Intervals (1,3) and (2,6) overlap, so they merge into (1,6). Others do not overlap.
Step 2: List merged intervals
Merged list is (1,6), (8,10), (15,18).
Final Answer:
[1,6] [8,10] [15,18] -> Option C
Quick Check:
Merged intervals = [1,6] [8,10] [15,18] [OK]
Hint: Merge overlapping intervals by extending end time [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not merging overlapping intervals
Printing original intervals without merge
Merging incorrectly leaving duplicates
4. Identify the bug in this Java method that merges intervals:
public List<Interval> mergeIntervals(List<Interval> intervals) {
Collections.sort(intervals, (a, b) -> a.start - b.start);
List<Interval> merged = new ArrayList<>();
for (Interval interval : intervals) {
if (merged.isEmpty() || merged.get(merged.size() - 1).end < interval.start) {
merged.add(interval);
} else {
merged.get(merged.size() - 1).end = interval.end;
}
}
return merged;
}
medium
A. It sorts intervals by end instead of start
B. It does not update the end to the max of overlapping intervals
C. It adds intervals even if they overlap
D. It returns the original list instead of merged list
Solution
Step 1: Check merging logic
When intervals overlap, the code sets end to interval.end directly, which may be smaller than current end.
Step 2: Correct approach
It should update end to max of current end and interval.end to cover full overlap.
Final Answer:
It does not update the end to the max of overlapping intervals -> Option B
Quick Check:
Update end = max(end, interval.end) needed [OK]
Hint: Update merged end to max of overlapping ends [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Setting end to interval.end without max check
Sorting by wrong field
Adding overlapping intervals separately
5. Given a list of intervals where some intervals are nested inside others, how does the merge overlapping intervals algorithm handle nested intervals like [(1,10), (2,5), (6,9)]? What is the final merged list?
hard
A. [(2,5), (6,9)]
B. [(1,5), (6,9), (10,10)]
C. [(1,5), (6,10)]
D. [(1,10)]
Solution
Step 1: Analyze nested intervals
Intervals (2,5) and (6,9) are fully inside (1,10), so they overlap completely.
Step 2: Merge nested intervals
Merging results in a single interval (1,10) covering all nested intervals.
Final Answer:
[(1,10)] -> Option D
Quick Check:
Nested intervals merge into outer interval [OK]
Hint: Nested intervals merge into the largest containing interval [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Keeping nested intervals separate
Splitting outer interval incorrectly
Ignoring full overlap cases
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.