What is the main idea behind using a stack to find the largest rectangle in a histogram?
Use a stack to keep track of bars in increasing height order. When a smaller bar appears, calculate areas with bars popped from the stack as the smallest bar, ensuring all rectangles are considered.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why do we push indices of bars onto the stack instead of their heights?
Indices allow us to calculate the width of rectangles easily by knowing the position of bars, which helps in computing the area of rectangles between bars.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What triggers the calculation of rectangle areas in the stack-based algorithm?
When the current bar's height is less than the height of the bar at the top of the stack, we pop from the stack and calculate the area for the popped bar as the smallest height rectangle.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
How do you calculate the width of the rectangle when popping a bar from the stack?
Width = current index - index of new top of stack - 1. If stack is empty after popping, width = current index.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of the largest rectangle in histogram algorithm using a stack?
O(n), because each bar is pushed and popped at most once from the stack.
Click to reveal answer
What data structure is primarily used to solve the largest rectangle in histogram problem efficiently?
AQueue
BLinked List
CStack
DHash Map
✗ Incorrect
A stack is used to keep track of bars in increasing order to calculate areas efficiently.
When do we pop bars from the stack during the algorithm?
AAt the end of the array only
BWhen the current bar is taller than the top of the stack
CWhen the stack is empty
DWhen the current bar is shorter than the top of the stack
✗ Incorrect
We pop bars when the current bar is shorter to calculate areas for bars taller than the current one.
What does the stack store in this algorithm?
AIndices of bars
BHeights of bars
CAreas of rectangles
DWidths of rectangles
✗ Incorrect
The stack stores indices to help calculate widths and areas.
If the stack is empty after popping a bar, how is the width calculated?
AWidth = 0
BWidth = current index
CWidth = current index - 1
DWidth = 1
✗ Incorrect
If stack is empty, width is the current index because the rectangle extends from start.
What is the overall time complexity of this stack-based solution?
AO(n)
BO(n log n)
CO(n^2)
DO(log n)
✗ Incorrect
Each bar is pushed and popped once, so the time complexity is linear O(n).
Explain step-by-step how the stack helps find the largest rectangle in a histogram.
Think about how the stack keeps track of bars and when areas are calculated.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how to calculate the width of the rectangle when popping a bar from the stack.
Width depends on positions of bars around the popped bar.
You got /4 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using a stack in the Largest Rectangle in Histogram problem?
easy
A. To keep track of bars' indices with increasing heights
B. To sort the histogram bars by height
C. To store the maximum area found so far
D. To reverse the order of histogram bars
Solution
Step 1: Understand the role of the stack
The stack stores indices of bars in increasing height order to efficiently find boundaries for rectangles.
Step 2: Why increasing order is important
When a lower height bar is found, it signals the end of rectangles for taller bars, allowing area calculation.
Final Answer:
To keep track of bars' indices with increasing heights -> Option A
Quick Check:
Stack tracks increasing bars = To keep track of bars' indices with increasing heights [OK]
Hint: Stack stores indices of increasing heights for area calculation [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking stack sorts bars by height
Using stack to store areas directly
Ignoring the order of bars in stack
2. Which of the following Java code snippets correctly initializes an empty stack to store integers for the histogram problem?
easy
A. Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<int>();
B. Stack stack = new Stack<int>();
C. Stack<int> stack = new Stack<>();
D. Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
Solution
Step 1: Identify correct generic syntax in Java
Java uses generics with angle brackets and wrapper classes like Integer, not primitive int.
Step 2: Check each option
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>(); uses Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>(); which is correct syntax for an empty integer stack.
Final Answer:
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>(); -> Option D
Quick Check:
Correct generic syntax = Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>(); [OK]
Hint: Use wrapper class Integer with generics and diamond operator [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using primitive int in generics
Missing diamond operator <>
Not specifying generic type
3. What is the output of the following Java code snippet that calculates the largest rectangle area in histogram heights = {2, 1, 5, 6, 2, 3}?
public class Histogram {
public static int largestRectangleArea(int[] heights) {
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
int maxArea = 0, i = 0;
while (i < heights.length) {
if (stack.isEmpty() || heights[i] >= heights[stack.peek()]) {
stack.push(i++);
} else {
int top = stack.pop();
int area = heights[top] * (stack.isEmpty() ? i : i - stack.peek() - 1);
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
}
}
while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
int top = stack.pop();
int area = heights[top] * (stack.isEmpty() ? i : i - stack.peek() - 1);
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
}
return maxArea;
}
public static void main(String[] args) {
int[] heights = {2, 1, 5, 6, 2, 3};
System.out.println(largestRectangleArea(heights));
}
}
medium
A. 12
B. 10
C. 8
D. 6
Solution
Step 1: Trace the stack operations and area calculations
For heights {2,1,5,6,2,3}, the largest rectangle area is 10 (from bars 5 and 6 with width 2).
Step 2: Confirm final maxArea value
After processing all bars and stack cleanup, maxArea is 10.
Final Answer:
10 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Largest rectangle area = 10 [OK]
Hint: Largest area is max of heights[top] * width during stack pops [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Miscomputing width when stack is empty
Not popping all remaining bars after loop
Confusing indices with heights
4. Identify the bug in the following Java method for Largest Rectangle in Histogram and select the fix:
public static int largestRectangleArea(int[] heights) {
Stack<Integer> stack = new Stack<>();
int maxArea = 0, i = 0;
while (i < heights.length) {
if (stack.isEmpty() || heights[i] > heights[stack.peek()]) {
stack.push(i++);
} else {
int top = stack.pop();
int area = heights[top] * (stack.isEmpty() ? i : i - stack.peek() - 1);
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
}
}
while (!stack.isEmpty()) {
int top = stack.pop();
int area = heights[top] * (stack.isEmpty() ? i : i - stack.peek() - 1);
maxArea = Math.max(maxArea, area);
}
return maxArea;
}
medium
A. Initialize maxArea to Integer.MIN_VALUE instead of 0
B. Replace stack with a queue for correct order
C. Change '>' to '>=' in the if condition to handle equal heights
D. Remove the second while loop to avoid double counting
Solution
Step 1: Analyze the if condition in the main loop
The condition uses '>' which skips pushing bars of equal height, causing incorrect area calculation.
Step 2: Fix by changing '>' to '>='
Using '>=' ensures bars of equal height are pushed, maintaining correct stack order and area calculation.
Final Answer:
Change '>' to '>=' in the if condition to handle equal heights -> Option C
Quick Check:
Use '>=' to handle equal heights correctly [OK]
Hint: Use '>=' to push equal height bars to stack [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using '>' causes missing equal height bars
Removing second loop causes incomplete area calculation
Using queue breaks LIFO needed for stack
5. Given a histogram with heights = {6, 2, 5, 4, 5, 1, 6}, what is the largest rectangle area using the stack approach? Explain how the stack helps find this area.
hard
A. 15
B. 10
C. 12
D. 8
Solution
Step 1: Use stack to track indices of increasing heights
Push indices while heights increase; pop when current height is less, calculating area with popped height as smallest bar.
Step 2: Calculate largest area for given heights
For {6,2,5,4,5,1,6}, largest rectangle area is 15 (bars at indices 0 and 6 with height 6 and width 1, or bars 2,3,4 with height 4 and width 3, but max is 15 from bars 0 to 0 or 6 to 6 or combined area 15 from bars 2,3,4 with height 5 and width 3).
Final Answer:
15 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Stack helps find max area = 15 [OK]
Hint: Stack pops calculate max area using height * width [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not popping all bars after iteration
Incorrect width calculation when stack is empty
Ignoring bars with same height
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.