What if you could find the odd one out instantly without checking every pair?
Why Find the Only Non Repeating Element Using XOR in DSA Java?
Imagine you have a box full of socks where every sock has a matching pair except one. You want to find that single sock without checking each pair one by one.
Manually comparing each sock to find the unmatched one takes a lot of time and effort. It's easy to make mistakes or miss pairs, especially if the box is large.
Using XOR, you can quickly find the single unmatched sock by combining all socks together. XOR cancels out pairs automatically, leaving only the unique sock.
int findUnique(int[] socks) {
for (int i = 0; i < socks.length; i++) {
boolean foundPair = false;
for (int j = 0; j < socks.length; j++) {
if (i != j && socks[i] == socks[j]) {
foundPair = true;
break;
}
}
if (!foundPair) return socks[i];
}
return -1;
}int findUnique(int[] socks) {
int uniqueSock = 0;
for (int sock : socks) {
uniqueSock ^= sock;
}
return uniqueSock;
}This method lets you instantly find the unique item in a group where all others appear twice, saving time and avoiding errors.
Finding the single defective product in a batch where every other product is identical and perfect.
Manual pair checking is slow and error-prone.
XOR operation cancels out pairs automatically.
Efficiently finds the unique element in linear time.
Practice
Solution
Step 1: Understand XOR property for identical numbers
XOR of a number with itself always results in 0 because bits cancel out.Step 2: Apply XOR on example
For example, 5 XOR 5 = 0.Final Answer:
It returns 0 -> Option AQuick Check:
X XOR X = 0 [OK]
- Thinking XOR returns the number itself
- Confusing XOR with OR
- Assuming XOR returns 1 for identical numbers
result to 0 in Java?Solution
Step 1: Recall Java variable initialization syntax
In Java, variables are declared with type, name, and assignment using single equals sign.Step 2: Check each option
int result = 0; uses correct syntax:int result = 0;. Others have syntax errors.Final Answer:
int result = 0; -> Option CQuick Check:
Correct Java variable initialization [OK]
- Using '==' instead of '='
- Using ':=' which is not Java syntax
- Assigning undefined variable 'zero'
int[] arr = {2, 3, 2, 4, 3};
int result = 0;
for (int num : arr) {
result ^= num;
}
System.out.println(result);Solution
Step 1: Apply XOR operation on array elements
Start with result=0, XOR with each element: 0^2=2, 2^3=1, 1^2=3, 3^4=7, 7^3=4.Step 2: Final XOR result is the non-repeating element
The only element that does not repeat is 4, which is the final XOR result.Final Answer:
4 -> Option AQuick Check:
Only non-repeating element = 4 [OK]
- Not starting XOR with 0
- Miscomputing XOR steps
- Assuming sum instead of XOR
int[] arr = {1, 2, 1, 3, 2};
int result;
for (int num : arr) {
result ^= num;
}
System.out.println(result);Solution
Step 1: Check variable initialization
The variable 'result' is declared but not initialized before XOR operation, causing a compile error.Step 2: Correct initialization needed
Initialize 'result' to 0 before the loop to avoid error.Final Answer:
Variable 'result' is not initialized before XOR operation -> Option DQuick Check:
Uninitialized variable causes error [OK]
- Forgetting to initialize result
- Misusing loop syntax
- Incorrect print statement
int[] arr = {5, 5, 5, 7, 7, 8, 8};
int result = 0;
for (int num : arr) {
result ^= num;
}
System.out.println(result);Solution
Step 1: Understand XOR property for odd/even counts
XOR cancels even number of identical elements to 0; odd count leaves the element.Step 2: Analyze given array and XOR result
5 appears 3 times (odd) -> XOR of three identical numbers is not the number itself; XOR of 5^5=0, 0^5=5, but this pattern does not hold for triple repeats in general.Step 3: Conclusion
XOR method cannot reliably find the unique element when counts are not exactly twice except one.Final Answer:
Cannot find unique element correctly -> Option BQuick Check:
XOR fails for elements repeating thrice [OK]
- Thinking XOR finds unique element with triple repeats
- Miscomputing XOR of three identical numbers as the number itself
- Ignoring that XOR only cancels pairs
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
