Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Goprogramming~3 mins

Why Word Search in Grid Using Backtracking in DSA Go?

Choose your learning style10 modes available
The Big Idea

What if you could find any hidden word in a puzzle without missing a single twist or turn?

The Scenario

Imagine you have a big crossword puzzle on paper, and you want to find if a certain word is hidden inside it. You try to look for the word by scanning each row and column manually, checking every letter one by one.

The Problem

This manual search is slow and tiring. You might miss the word if it bends or twists in the puzzle. Also, checking every possible path by hand is confusing and error-prone.

The Solution

Backtracking helps by trying each letter step-by-step and going back if the path doesn't lead to the word. It explores all possible directions automatically, making sure no possibility is missed.

Before vs After
✗ Before
for i := 0; i < rows; i++ {
  for j := 0; j < cols; j++ {
    if grid[i][j] == word[0] {
      // Manually check neighbors
    }
  }
}
✓ After
func exist(grid [][]byte, word string) bool {
  // Use backtracking to explore all paths
  // Return true if word found
  return false
}
What It Enables

This lets you quickly and correctly find words hidden in any direction inside a grid, even if they twist or turn.

Real Life Example

Finding words in a word search puzzle game on your phone, where words can be horizontal, vertical, or diagonal.

Key Takeaways

Manual search is slow and error-prone for complex grids.

Backtracking tries all paths and steps back when stuck.

It ensures no possible word path is missed in the grid.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using backtracking in a word search grid problem?
easy
A. To count the number of words in the grid
B. To sort the grid alphabetically
C. To explore all possible paths to find the word
D. To replace characters in the grid

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand backtracking in word search

    Backtracking tries all possible paths in the grid to find the target word by exploring neighbors recursively.
  2. Step 2: Eliminate other options

    Sorting, counting, or replacing characters are unrelated to the search process using backtracking.
  3. Final Answer:

    To explore all possible paths to find the word -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Backtracking = Explore paths [OK]
Hint: Backtracking means trying all paths until word found [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Thinking backtracking sorts or modifies the grid
  • Confusing backtracking with simple iteration
  • Assuming backtracking counts words directly
2. Which of the following is the correct way to check if a position (row, col) is inside the grid in Go?
easy
A. if row > 0 && row <= len(grid) && col > 0 && col <= len(grid[0])
B. if row > 0 && row < len(grid) && col > 0 && col < len(grid[0])
C. if row >= 0 && row <= len(grid) && col >= 0 && col <= len(grid[0])
D. if row >= 0 && row < len(grid) && col >= 0 && col < len(grid[0])

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand grid indexing in Go

    Grid indices start at 0 and go up to length-1, so valid indices satisfy 0 <= row < len(grid) and 0 <= col < len(grid[0]).
  2. Step 2: Check each option

    if row >= 0 && row < len(grid) && col >= 0 && col < len(grid[0]) correctly uses >= 0 and < length. Options A, C, D use incorrect bounds like > 0 or <= length which are off by one.
  3. Final Answer:

    if row >= 0 && row < len(grid) && col >= 0 && col < len(grid[0]) -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Index check = if row >= 0 && row < len(grid) && col >= 0 && col < len(grid[0]) [OK]
Hint: Use zero-based indexing with < length for bounds [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using > 0 instead of >= 0 excludes first row/column
  • Using <= length allows out-of-range index
  • Confusing row and column lengths
3. What will be the output of the following Go code snippet for word search?
grid := [][]byte{{'A','B','C','E'},{'S','F','C','S'},{'A','D','E','E'}}
word := "ABCCED"
found := exist(grid, word)
fmt.Println(found)

func exist(board [][]byte, word string) bool {
    for i := 0; i < len(board); i++ {
        for j := 0; j < len(board[0]); j++ {
            if backtrack(board, word, i, j, 0) {
                return true
            }
        }
    }
    return false
}

func backtrack(board [][]byte, word string, row, col, index int) bool {
    if index == len(word) {
        return true
    }
    if row < 0 || row >= len(board) || col < 0 || col >= len(board[0]) || board[row][col] != word[index] {
        return false
    }
    temp := board[row][col]
    board[row][col] = '#'
    found := backtrack(board, word, row+1, col, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row-1, col, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row, col+1, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row, col-1, index+1)
    board[row][col] = temp
    return found
}
medium
A. true
B. false
C. Compilation error
D. Runtime panic

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the grid and word

    The grid contains the letters to form the word "ABCCED" starting at (0,0) moving right and down.
  2. Step 2: Trace backtracking calls

    Backtracking explores neighbors and marks visited cells with '#'. The word "ABCCED" can be found following the path A->B->C->C->E->D.
  3. Final Answer:

    true -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Word found = true [OK]
Hint: Trace path letter by letter with backtracking [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Not marking visited cells causing revisits
  • Incorrect boundary checks causing false negatives
  • Assuming word is not found without tracing path
4. The following Go code for word search returns false even when the word exists. What is the bug?
func backtrack(board [][]byte, word string, row, col, index int) bool {
    if index == len(word) {
        return true
    }
    if row < 0 || row >= len(board) || col < 0 || col >= len(board[0]) || board[row][col] != word[index] {
        return false
    }
    // Missing marking visited cell
    found := backtrack(board, word, row+1, col, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row-1, col, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row, col+1, index+1) ||
             backtrack(board, word, row, col-1, index+1)
    return found
}
medium
A. The function does not mark visited cells, causing revisits
B. The base case is incorrect and should return false
C. The boundary checks are missing
D. The word parameter is not passed correctly

Solution

  1. Step 1: Analyze the backtrack function

    The function checks boundaries and matches characters but does not mark visited cells, so it can revisit the same cell multiple times.
  2. Step 2: Understand the impact of missing visited marking

    Without marking visited cells, the search may loop or fail to find the word correctly because it revisits cells already used in the current path.
  3. Final Answer:

    The function does not mark visited cells, causing revisits -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Missing visited marking = The function does not mark visited cells, causing revisits [OK]
Hint: Always mark visited cells to avoid revisiting [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Ignoring visited marking causes infinite loops
  • Misunderstanding base case logic
  • Assuming boundary checks fix revisits
5. Given a grid and a list of words, how can you efficiently find all words present in the grid using backtracking? Choose the best approach.
hard
A. Run backtracking separately for each word on the entire grid
B. Build a Trie of words and use backtracking with pruning to find all words
C. Sort the grid and words alphabetically before searching
D. Replace all grid letters with '#' and then search

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem of multiple words

    Searching each word separately is inefficient because it repeats similar searches multiple times.
  2. Step 2: Use Trie with backtracking

    Building a Trie (prefix tree) of all words allows pruning paths early if no word matches, improving efficiency significantly.
  3. Step 3: Eliminate incorrect options

    Sorting or replacing letters does not help search. Running backtracking separately is slow.
  4. Final Answer:

    Build a Trie of words and use backtracking with pruning to find all words -> Option B
  5. Quick Check:

    Trie + backtracking = efficient multi-word search [OK]
Hint: Use Trie to prune backtracking paths for multiple words [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Searching each word independently wastes time
  • Ignoring Trie data structure benefits
  • Trying to sort grid which doesn't help search
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard