Tabulation is a bottom-up approach in dynamic programming where we solve smaller subproblems first and store their results in a table (usually an array). Then, we use these results to solve bigger problems step-by-step.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How does Tabulation differ from Memoization?
Tabulation solves problems by filling a table from the smallest subproblem up to the main problem (bottom-up). Memoization solves problems top-down by storing results of recursive calls to avoid repeated work.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why is Tabulation often preferred over Memoization?
Tabulation avoids recursion overhead and stack overflow risks. It usually has better performance because it fills the table iteratively and ensures all subproblems are solved once.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In Tabulation, what does the table usually represent?
The table stores the results of subproblems. Each entry corresponds to a smaller problem's answer, which helps build up the solution to the full problem.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Give a simple example problem solved by Tabulation.
The Fibonacci sequence can be solved by tabulation by filling an array from the base cases (fib(0)=0, fib(1)=1) up to fib(n), each entry being the sum of the two previous entries.
Click to reveal answer
What is the main idea behind Tabulation in DP?
ASolve smaller problems first and build up to the main problem
BUse recursion and store results when needed
CGuess the answer and check correctness
DDivide the problem into unrelated parts
✗ Incorrect
Tabulation solves smaller subproblems first and uses their results to solve bigger problems.
Which approach uses recursion: Memoization or Tabulation?
AMemoization
BNeither
CBoth
DTabulation
✗ Incorrect
Memoization uses recursion and stores results to avoid repeated work; Tabulation is iterative.
What is stored in the table used in Tabulation?
AFunction calls
BInput values
CRandom numbers
DResults of subproblems
✗ Incorrect
The table stores results of subproblems to build the final answer.
Which is a benefit of Tabulation over Memoization?
AUses less memory always
BDoes not require a table
CAvoids recursion overhead
DWorks only for sorting problems
✗ Incorrect
Tabulation avoids recursion overhead by using iteration.
In the Fibonacci example, what does each table entry represent?
ASum of all previous numbers
BFibonacci number at that index
CProduct of previous two numbers
DDifference between previous two numbers
✗ Incorrect
Each entry stores the Fibonacci number at that index.
Explain how Tabulation solves a problem using a bottom-up approach.
Think about filling a table step-by-step from the base cases.
You got /4 concepts.
Describe the difference between Tabulation and Memoization in dynamic programming.
Focus on the direction and method of solving subproblems.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main idea behind Tabulation Bottom Up DP in dynamic programming?
easy
A. Use random guesses to find the solution
B. Solve the problem by recursion without storing results
C. Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem
D. Start solving from the largest problem and go downwards
Solution
Step 1: Understand tabulation approach
Tabulation means filling a table starting from the smallest subproblems.
Step 2: Compare with other methods
Unlike recursion, tabulation solves subproblems first and uses their answers to solve bigger problems.
Final Answer:
Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem -> Option C
Quick Check:
Tabulation = Bottom Up DP [OK]
Hint: Think bottom-up: solve small parts first, then bigger [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing tabulation with recursion
Thinking tabulation starts from the largest problem
Ignoring the use of a table to store results
2. Which of the following Go code snippets correctly initializes a DP table for tabulation with size n+1 and zero values?
easy
A. dp := []int{n+1}
B. dp := make([]int, n)
C. dp := new(int, n+1)
D. dp := make([]int, n+1)
Solution
Step 1: Understand Go slice initialization
To create a slice of integers with length n+1 filled with zeros, use make([]int, n+1).
Step 2: Check other options
dp := make([]int, n) creates size n, not n+1; dp := []int{n+1} is invalid syntax; dp := new(int, n+1) is invalid for slices.
Final Answer:
dp := make([]int, n+1) -> Option D
Quick Check:
make([]int, n+1) creates zero-filled slice [OK]
Hint: Use make([]int, size) for zero-filled slices [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Using wrong slice size (n instead of n+1)
Using new() which returns pointer, not slice
Incorrect slice literal syntax
3. What is the output of the following Go code using bottom-up DP to compute Fibonacci numbers?
func fib(n int) int {
dp := make([]int, n+1)
dp[0], dp[1] = 0, 1
for i := 2; i <= n; i++ {
dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2]
}
return dp[n]
}
fmt.Println(fib(5))
medium
A. 5
B. 8
C. 3
D. 13
Solution
Step 1: Trace DP table filling for n=5
dp[0]=0, dp[1]=1; then dp[2]=1, dp[3]=2, dp[4]=3, dp[5]=5.
4. Identify the bug in this bottom-up DP code for computing factorial in Go:
func factorial(n int) int {
dp := make([]int, n+1)
dp[0] = 1
for i := 1; i < n; i++ {
dp[i] = i * dp[i-1]
}
return dp[n]
}
medium
A. dp slice size should be n, not n+1
B. Loop should run until i <= n, not i < n
C. Return statement should be dp[n-1]
D. dp[0] should be 0, not 1
Solution
Step 1: Check loop range for factorial calculation
Factorial needs to compute dp[n], so loop must include i = n (i <= n).
Step 2: Identify impact of loop range
Current loop stops at i = n-1, so dp[n] remains zero, causing wrong return.
Final Answer:
Loop should run until i <= n, not i < n -> Option B
Quick Check:
Loop must cover all factorial steps [OK]
Hint: Factorial needs full range including n [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Stopping loop before n
Wrong base case initialization
Returning wrong dp index
5. Given a list of coin denominations coins := []int{1, 2, 5} and an amount amount := 5, which bottom-up DP code snippet correctly computes the minimum number of coins needed to make the amount? Assume impossible cases return -1.
hard
A. dp := make([]int, amount+1); for i := range dp { dp[i] = amount+1 }; dp[0] = 0; for i := 1; i <= amount; i++ { for _, c := range coins { if c <= i && dp[i-c]+1 < dp[i] { dp[i] = dp[i-c] + 1 } } }; if dp[amount] > amount { return -1 } else { return dp[amount] }
B. dp := make([]int, amount); dp[0] = 0; for i := 1; i < amount; i++ { for _, c := range coins { if c <= i { dp[i] = dp[i-c] + 1 } } }; return dp[amount]
C. dp := make([]int, amount+1); dp[0] = 1; for i := 1; i <= amount; i++ { for _, c := range coins { if c <= i { dp[i] = dp[i-c] + 1 } } }; return dp[amount]
D. dp := make([]int, amount+1); for i := 0; i <= amount; i++ { dp[i] = 0 }; for i := 1; i <= amount; i++ { for _, c := range coins { if c <= i && dp[i-c] != 0 { dp[i] = dp[i-c] + 1 } } }; return dp[amount]
Solution
Step 1: Initialize dp with large values and base case
Set dp size to amount+1, fill with amount+1 (impossible large), and dp[0]=0.
Step 2: Update dp with minimum coins for each amount
For each amount i, check all coins c; if c <= i, update dp[i] = min(dp[i], dp[i-c]+1).
Step 3: Return result or -1 if impossible
If dp[amount] > amount, return -1; else return dp[amount].
Final Answer:
Option A code snippet -> Option A
Quick Check:
Proper initialization and min update needed [OK]
Hint: Initialize dp with large number, update min coins [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Wrong dp size or initialization
Not checking if dp[i-c] is valid
Incorrect base case dp[0]
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.