Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA Goprogramming~10 mins

Longest Common Subsequence in DSA Go - Interactive Practice

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Practice - 5 Tasks
Answer the questions below
1fill in blank
easy

Complete the code to initialize the 2D slice for dynamic programming.

DSA Go
dp := make([][]int, len(s1)+1)
for i := range dp {
    dp[i] = make([]int, [1])
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Alen(s2)+1
Blen(s1)+1
Clen(s2)
Dlen(s1)
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using len(s1)+1 for columns instead of len(s2)+1
Forgetting the +1 for base case initialization
2fill in blank
medium

Complete the code to check if characters match in the LCS logic.

DSA Go
if s1[i-1] == [1][j-1] {
    dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
As1
Bs2
Cdp
Dlcs
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Comparing s1[i-1] with s1[j-1]
Using dp or lcs instead of s2
3fill in blank
hard

Fix the error in updating dp when characters do not match.

DSA Go
else {
    dp[i][j] = [1](dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1])
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
Asum
Bmin
Cmax
Dabs
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using min instead of max
Using sum which is incorrect for LCS
4fill in blank
hard

Fill both blanks to correctly backtrack the LCS string.

DSA Go
if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] {
    lcs = string(s1[i-1]) + lcs
    i = i [1] 1
} else if dp[i-1][j] [2] dp[i][j-1] {
    i = i - 1
} else {
    j = j - 1
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
A-
B>
C<
D+
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using + instead of - for i decrement
Using < instead of > in comparison
5fill in blank
hard

Fill all three blanks to complete the LCS function return statement and helper function call.

DSA Go
func longestCommonSubsequence(s1, s2 string) string {
    dp := make([][]int, len(s1)+1)
    for i := range dp {
        dp[i] = make([]int, len(s2)+1)
    }
    for i := 1; i <= len(s1); i++ {
        for j := 1; j <= len(s2); j++ {
            if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] {
                dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1
            } else {
                dp[i][j] = max(dp[i-1][j], dp[i][j-1])
            }
        }
    }
    return [1](s1, s2, dp, len(s1), len(s2))
}

func [2](s1, s2 string, dp [][]int, i, j int) string {
    if i == 0 || j == 0 {
        return ""
    }
    if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] {
        return [3](s1, s2, dp, i-1, j-1) + string(s1[i-1])
    }
    if dp[i-1][j] > dp[i][j-1] {
        return lcsHelper(s1, s2, dp, i-1, j)
    }
    return lcsHelper(s1, s2, dp, i, j-1)
}
Drag options to blanks, or click blank then click option'
AlcsHelper
BlongestCommonSubsequence
Dmax
Attempts:
3 left
💡 Hint
Common Mistakes
Using longestCommonSubsequence instead of helper function
Using max instead of recursive call

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the Longest Common Subsequence (LCS) between two strings represent?
easy
A. The longest substring that appears exactly the same in both strings.
B. The longest sequence of characters that appear in both strings in the same order, but not necessarily consecutively.
C. The shortest sequence that can be formed by combining both strings.
D. The total number of characters in both strings combined.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the definition of LCS

    The LCS is the longest sequence that appears in both strings in the same order, but characters do not need to be next to each other.
  2. Step 2: Differentiate from substring

    A substring requires characters to be consecutive, but LCS allows gaps.
  3. Final Answer:

    The longest sequence of characters that appear in both strings in the same order, but not necessarily consecutively. -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    LCS = longest ordered sequence [OK]
Hint: LCS is about order, not consecutive characters [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing LCS with longest substring
  • Thinking LCS characters must be consecutive
  • Mixing LCS with string concatenation
2. Which of the following Go function signatures correctly represents a function to compute the length of the LCS of two strings s1 and s2?
easy
A. func lcs(s1, s2 string) int
B. func lcs(s1, s2 int) string
C. func lcs(s1, s2 []int) int
D. func lcs(s1, s2 string) string

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify input types for LCS function

    The LCS function takes two strings as input, so parameters should be of type string.
  2. Step 2: Identify output type for LCS function

    The function returns the length of the LCS, which is an integer.
  3. Final Answer:

    func lcs(s1, s2 string) int -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Input strings, output int length [OK]
Hint: LCS inputs are strings, output is integer length [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using wrong input types like int or slices
  • Returning string instead of length
  • Mixing input and output types
3. What is the output of the following Go code snippet?
package main
import "fmt"
func lcs(s1, s2 string) int {
    m, n := len(s1), len(s2)
    dp := make([][]int, m+1)
    for i := range dp {
        dp[i] = make([]int, n+1)
    }
    for i := 1; i <= m; i++ {
        for j := 1; j <= n; j++ {
            if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] {
                dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1
            } else {
                if dp[i-1][j] > dp[i][j-1] {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]
                } else {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i][j-1]
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return dp[m][n]
}
func main() {
    fmt.Println(lcs("AGGTAB", "GXTXAYB"))
}
medium
A. 4
B. 5
C. 6
D. 7

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the input strings

    Strings are "AGGTAB" and "GXTXAYB". We find their LCS length using dynamic programming.
  2. Step 2: Trace the LCS calculation

    The LCS is "GTAB" which has length 4, but checking carefully the code and strings, the LCS is actually "GTAB" (length 4) or "GTTAB"? The correct LCS is "GTAB" length 4 or "GTAB" length 4? Actually, the LCS is "GTAB" length 4. But the code returns 4 or 5? Let's check carefully: The LCS is "GTAB" (G T A B) length 4. But the code returns dp[m][n], which is 4. But options have 4 and 5. Let's verify carefully: The LCS is "GTAB" length 4. So output is 4.
  3. Final Answer:

    4 -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    LCS length of "AGGTAB" and "GXTXAYB" = 4 [OK]
Hint: Trace DP table or recall classic LCS example [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing LCS length with longest substring length
  • Off-by-one errors in indexing
  • Misreading input strings
4. The following Go code attempts to compute the LCS length but has a bug. What is the bug?
func lcs(s1, s2 string) int {
    m, n := len(s1), len(s2)
    dp := make([][]int, m)
    for i := range dp {
        dp[i] = make([]int, n)
    }
    for i := 1; i <= m; i++ {
        for j := 1; j <= n; j++ {
            if s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] {
                dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j-1] + 1
            } else {
                if dp[i-1][j] > dp[i][j-1] {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i-1][j]
                } else {
                    dp[i][j] = dp[i][j-1]
                }
            }
        }
    }
    return dp[m-1][n-1]
}
medium
A. The return statement should be dp[m][n] instead of dp[m-1][n-1].
B. The loops should start from 0 instead of 1.
C. The dp slice is not initialized with size m+1 and n+1, causing index out of range errors.
D. The comparison s1[i-1] == s2[j-1] should be s1[i] == s2[j].

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check dp slice initialization

    The dp slice is created with size m and n, but the loops access dp[i][j] for i and j up to m and n inclusive, causing index out of range errors.
  2. Step 2: Correct dp size for safe indexing

    dp should be initialized with size m+1 and n+1 to safely access dp[i][j] where i and j go up to m and n.
  3. Final Answer:

    The dp slice is not initialized with size m+1 and n+1, causing index out of range errors. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    dp size must be m+1 x n+1 [OK]
Hint: dp size must cover all indices used in loops [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Initializing dp with size m and n instead of m+1 and n+1
  • Starting loops at 1 but dp size too small
  • Incorrect return index
5. Given two strings s1 = "ABCBDAB" and s2 = "BDCABA", write a Go function that returns the actual Longest Common Subsequence string, not just its length. Which approach correctly reconstructs the LCS from the DP table?
hard
A. Sort both strings and find common characters in sorted order.
B. Build the DP table and return dp[m][n] as the LCS string directly.
C. Use recursion without memoization to find the LCS string.
D. Build the DP table for LCS length, then backtrack from dp[m][n] moving diagonally when characters match, else move in direction of larger dp value.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Build DP table for LCS length

    Use dynamic programming to fill dp table with lengths of LCS for substrings of s1 and s2.
  2. Step 2: Backtrack to reconstruct LCS string

    Start from dp[m][n], move diagonally up-left if characters match (add character to result), else move in direction of larger dp value until reaching dp[0][0].
  3. Final Answer:

    Build the DP table for LCS length, then backtrack from dp[m][n] moving diagonally when characters match, else move in direction of larger dp value. -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    DP + backtracking reconstructs LCS string [OK]
Hint: Backtrack DP table diagonally on matches to get LCS string [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Returning dp[m][n] as string instead of length
  • Not backtracking to reconstruct sequence
  • Sorting strings loses original order
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard