Tabulation Bottom Up DP in DSA C# - Time & Space Complexity
We want to understand how fast a bottom-up dynamic programming solution runs.
Specifically, how the steps grow as the input size increases.
Analyze the time complexity of the following code snippet.
int[] dp = new int[n + 1];
dp[0] = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = int.MaxValue;
for (int j = 1; j <= i; j++) {
dp[i] = Math.Min(dp[i], dp[i - j] + cost[j - 1]);
}
}
return dp[n];
This code fills a table from the bottom up to find the minimum cost for a problem of size n.
Identify the loops, recursion, array traversals that repeat.
- Primary operation: Nested loops where the outer loop runs from 1 to n, and the inner loop runs from 1 to i.
- How many times: The inner loop runs i times for each i, so total operations add up as 1 + 2 + 3 + ... + n.
As n grows, the total steps grow roughly like the sum of numbers from 1 to n.
| Input Size (n) | Approx. Operations |
|---|---|
| 10 | 55 |
| 100 | 5,050 |
| 1000 | 500,500 |
Pattern observation: The operations grow roughly with the square of n, so doubling n roughly quadruples the work.
Time Complexity: O(n²)
This means the time needed grows roughly with the square of the input size.
[X] Wrong: "Since we use a table, the solution must be very fast, like O(n)."
[OK] Correct: The nested loops cause the time to grow faster than linear, so it is actually quadratic, not linear.
Understanding this time complexity helps you explain how dynamic programming improves over naive recursion.
It shows you can solve problems efficiently by building solutions step-by-step.
"What if we could reduce the inner loop to run only a fixed number of times? How would the time complexity change?"
Practice
Tabulation Bottom Up DP in dynamic programming?Solution
Step 1: Understand bottom-up approach
Tabulation means filling a table starting from the smallest subproblems, building up to the final answer.Step 2: Compare with other methods
Unlike recursion without memoization, tabulation avoids repeated work by storing results in a table.Final Answer:
Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem -> Option DQuick Check:
Tabulation = Bottom-up table filling [OK]
- Confusing tabulation with recursion
- Ignoring the order of filling the table
- Not storing intermediate results
Solution
Step 1: Check array size and base cases
For Fibonacci, dp array size should be n+1 to include dp[n]. Base cases are dp[0]=0 and dp[1]=1.Step 2: Verify initialization correctness
int[] dp = new int[n + 1]; dp[0] = 0; dp[1] = 1; correctly initializes dp with size n+1 and sets dp[0]=0, dp[1]=1.Final Answer:
int[] dp = new int[n + 1]; dp[0] = 0; dp[1] = 1; -> Option CQuick Check:
Correct array size and base values [OK]
- Using wrong array size (n instead of n+1)
- Swapping base values dp[0] and dp[1]
- Not initializing base cases
int n = 3;
int[] dp = new int[n + 1];
dp[0] = 1;
dp[1] = 1;
for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = dp[i - 1] + dp[i - 2];
}
Console.WriteLine(dp[n]);Solution
Step 1: Understand dp array meaning
dp[i] stores number of ways to reach step i. Base: dp[0]=1 (one way to stand still), dp[1]=1 (one way to step 1).Step 2: Calculate dp values up to n=3
dp[2] = dp[1] + dp[0] = 1 + 1 = 2; dp[3] = dp[2] + dp[1] = 2 + 1 = 3.Final Answer:
3 -> Option BQuick Check:
Ways to climb 3 steps = 3 [OK]
- Confusing dp indices or base cases
- Off-by-one errors in loop
- Misunderstanding dp meaning
int n = 5;
int[] dp = new int[n + 1];
dp[0] = 1;
for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
dp[i] = dp[i - 1] * i;
}
Console.WriteLine(dp[n]);Solution
Step 1: Check array size and initialization
dp size n+1 is correct to store factorials from 0 to n. dp[0] = 1 is correct as 0! = 1.Step 2: Verify loop and calculation
Loop from i=1 to n correctly calculates dp[i] = dp[i-1] * i, which is factorial definition.Final Answer:
No error, code works correctly -> Option AQuick Check:
Factorial DP code is correct [OK]
- Wrong dp array size causing index errors
- Incorrect base case initialization
- Starting loop at wrong index
coins = {1, 2, 5} and a target amount amount = 5, which bottom-up DP approach correctly computes the minimum number of coins needed to make the amount?
int amount = 5;
int[] dp = new int[amount + 1];
for (int i = 1; i <= amount; i++) dp[i] = int.MaxValue;
int[] coins = {1, 2, 5};
for (int i = 1; i <= amount; i++) {
foreach (int coin in coins) {
if (coin <= i && dp[i - coin] != int.MaxValue) {
dp[i] = Math.Min(dp[i], dp[i - coin] + 1);
}
}
}
Console.WriteLine(dp[amount]);Solution
Step 1: Understand dp meaning and initialization
dp[i] stores minimum coins to make amount i. Initialized dp[0]=0 (default), others to MaxValue.Step 2: Calculate dp values for amount=5
Calculate dp[1]=1 (coin 1), dp[2]=1 (coin 2), dp[3]=2 (1+2), dp[4]=2 (2+2), dp[5]=1 (coin 5). Minimum coins for 5 is 1.Step 3: Re-check code logic
Code correctly updates dp[i] with minimum coins. Output dp[5] = 1.Final Answer:
1 -> Option AQuick Check:
Minimum coins for 5 = 1 (coin 5) [OK]
- Not initializing dp array properly
- Ignoring dp[i - coin] == int.MaxValue check
- Confusing minimum with maximum coin count
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown
