What is the main idea behind the two-pointer technique in removing duplicates from a sorted array?
Use one pointer to track the position of the last unique element and another pointer to scan through the array. When a new unique element is found, move it next to the last unique element.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Why does the two-pointer method work efficiently on a sorted array for removing duplicates?
Because duplicates are adjacent in a sorted array, we can easily compare current and previous elements to detect duplicates without extra space.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
In the two-pointer approach, what does the first pointer represent after processing the array?
It represents the index of the last unique element, so the length of the array without duplicates is this index plus one.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
What is the time complexity of removing duplicates from a sorted array using the two-pointer technique?
O(n), where n is the number of elements in the array, because each element is visited once.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Show the C# code snippet for removing duplicates from a sorted array using two pointers.
int RemoveDuplicates(int[] nums) {
if (nums.Length == 0) return 0;
int i = 0;
for (int j = 1; j < nums.Length; j++) {
if (nums[j] != nums[i]) {
i++;
nums[i] = nums[j];
}
}
return i + 1;
}
Click to reveal answer
What does the first pointer track in the two-pointer method for removing duplicates?
AThe current element being checked
BThe total number of duplicates
CThe last unique element's index
DThe first element of the array
✗ Incorrect
The first pointer tracks the index of the last unique element found.
Why is the two-pointer technique suitable for sorted arrays when removing duplicates?
AIt uses extra memory
BDuplicates are grouped together
CIt sorts the array again
DIt removes elements randomly
✗ Incorrect
Because duplicates are adjacent in sorted arrays, the technique can easily detect and skip them.
What is the time complexity of the two-pointer approach for removing duplicates?
AO(n^2)
BO(n log n)
CO(1)
DO(n)
✗ Incorrect
The array is traversed once, so the time complexity is O(n).
After removing duplicates, how do you find the new length of the array?
ALast unique index + 1
BTotal elements - duplicates
CFirst pointer index
DArray length divided by 2
✗ Incorrect
The new length is the last unique element's index plus one.
In the two-pointer method, what happens when nums[j] != nums[i]?
AIncrement i and copy nums[j] to nums[i]
BSkip the element
CReset pointers
DDo nothing
✗ Incorrect
When a new unique element is found, i is incremented and nums[j] is copied to nums[i].
Explain how the two-pointer technique removes duplicates from a sorted array step-by-step.
Think about how one pointer tracks unique elements and the other scans the array.
You got /4 concepts.
Write the C# code to remove duplicates from a sorted array using the two-pointer approach and explain each line.
Focus on how the pointers move and how the array is updated.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What is the main purpose of using two pointers in the Remove Duplicates from Sorted Array problem?
easy
A. To create a new array with unique elements
B. To sort the array before removing duplicates
C. To efficiently track unique elements and overwrite duplicates in-place
D. To count the total number of duplicates in the array
Solution
Step 1: Understand the two-pointer approach
One pointer tracks the position to place the next unique element, the other scans the array.
Step 2: Purpose of pointers in-place
This method avoids extra space by overwriting duplicates directly in the original array.
Final Answer:
To efficiently track unique elements and overwrite duplicates in-place -> Option C
Quick Check:
Two pointers help remove duplicates in-place [OK]
Hint: Two pointers track and overwrite duplicates without extra space [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Thinking two pointers sort the array
Assuming a new array is created
Confusing counting duplicates with removing them
2. Which of the following is the correct C# syntax to initialize the two pointers i and j for the problem?
easy
A. int i = 1; int j = 1;
B. int i = 1, j = 0;
C. int i = 0; int j = 0;
D. int i = 0, j = 1;
Solution
Step 1: Identify pointer roles
Pointer i starts at index 0 to track unique elements, j starts at 1 to scan ahead.
Step 2: Check initialization correctness
Initializing i = 0 and j = 1 matches the logic of comparing current and next elements.
Final Answer:
int i = 0, j = 1; -> Option D
Quick Check:
Start i at 0 and j at 1 [OK]
Hint: Start i at 0 and j at 1 to compare adjacent elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Starting both pointers at 0
Swapping i and j initialization
Starting both pointers at 1
3. What will be the output array and new length after running the two-pointer method on the sorted array [1, 1, 2, 3, 3]?
medium
A. [1, 2, 3, 3], length = 4
B. [1, 2, 3], length = 3
C. [1, 1, 2, 3, 3], length = 5
D. [1, 2, 2, 3], length = 4
Solution
Step 1: Trace the two-pointer process
Start with i=0, j=1. Compare elements: skip duplicates, overwrite unique elements at i+1.
Step 2: Final array and length
Unique elements are 1, 2, 3 placed at start. Length is 3.
Final Answer:
[1, 2, 3], length = 3 -> Option B
Quick Check:
Unique elements count = 3 [OK]
Hint: Overwrite duplicates, count unique elements for length [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Not updating length after removal
Leaving duplicates in output
Misplacing unique elements
4. Identify the error in the following C# code snippet for removing duplicates from a sorted array:
int RemoveDuplicates(int[] nums) {
int i = 0, j = 1;
while (j < nums.Length) {
if (nums[i] != nums[j]) {
i++;
nums[i] = nums[j];
}
j++;
}
return i;
}
medium
A. The function should return i + 1 instead of i
B. Pointers i and j should both start at 1
C. The while loop condition should be j <= nums.Length
D. The array should be sorted inside the function
Solution
Step 1: Understand pointer meaning
Pointer i tracks last unique element index, so length is i + 1.
Step 2: Check return value
Returning i alone misses counting the first element, so return i + 1.
Final Answer:
The function should return i + 1 instead of i -> Option A
Quick Check:
Return length as i + 1 [OK]
Hint: Return i + 1 as length, not just i [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Returning i instead of i + 1
Incorrect loop boundary causing out-of-range
Sorting array inside function unnecessarily
5. Given a sorted array nums = [0,0,1,1,1,2,2,3,3,4], what will be the array state and returned length after applying the two-pointer duplicate removal method?
hard
A. [0, 1, 2, 3, 4], length = 5
B. [0, 0, 1, 2, 3, 4], length = 6
C. [0, 1, 1, 2, 3, 4], length = 6
D. [0, 1, 2, 3, 3, 4], length = 6
Solution
Step 1: Apply two-pointer method step-by-step
Start with i=0, j=1. Move j forward, overwrite duplicates by placing unique elements at i+1.
Step 2: Final array and length
Unique elements are 0,1,2,3,4 placed at start. Length is 5.
Final Answer:
[0, 1, 2, 3, 4], length = 5 -> Option A
Quick Check:
Unique count = 5 [OK]
Hint: Overwrite duplicates, count unique elements for final length [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Leaving duplicates in the array
Returning wrong length
Misplacing unique elements during overwrite
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.