Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C#programming~20 mins

Next Greater Element Using Stack in DSA C# - Practice Problems & Challenges

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Challenge - 5 Problems
🎖️
Next Greater Element Master
Get all challenges correct to earn this badge!
Test your skills under time pressure!
❓ Predict Output
intermediate
2:00remaining
Output of Next Greater Element for a given array
What is the output of the following C# code that finds the next greater element for each item in the array?
DSA C#
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Program {
    static void Main() {
        int[] arr = {4, 5, 2, 25};
        int[] result = NextGreaterElement(arr);
        foreach (int val in result) {
            Console.Write(val + " ");
        }
    }

    static int[] NextGreaterElement(int[] nums) {
        int n = nums.Length;
        int[] res = new int[n];
        Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>();

        for (int i = n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
            while (stack.Count > 0 && stack.Peek() <= nums[i]) {
                stack.Pop();
            }
            res[i] = stack.Count == 0 ? -1 : stack.Peek();
            stack.Push(nums[i]);
        }
        return res;
    }
}
A5 25 25 -1
B25 25 25 -1
C25 -1 25 -1
D5 25 -1 -1
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Trace the stack operations from right to left and note the next greater element for each position.
🧠 Conceptual
intermediate
1:30remaining
Understanding the role of stack in Next Greater Element
Why do we use a stack to solve the Next Greater Element problem efficiently?
ABecause stack stores all elements so we can access them randomly anytime.
BBecause stack helps keep track of elements in decreasing order to find the next greater element quickly.
CBecause stack sorts the array automatically to find greater elements.
DBecause stack reverses the array to process elements from left to right.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Think about how the stack helps us remember candidates for the next greater element while scanning from right to left.
🔧 Debug
advanced
2:00remaining
Identify the error in Next Greater Element implementation
What error will the following code produce when trying to find the next greater element?
DSA C#
int[] NextGreaterElement(int[] nums) {
    int n = nums.Length;
    int[] res = new int[n];
    Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>();

    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        while (stack.Count > 0 && stack.Peek() <= nums[i]) {
            stack.Pop();
        }
        res[i] = stack.Count == 0 ? -1 : stack.Peek();
        stack.Push(nums[i]);
    }
    return res;
}
AThe output will be incorrect because the loop processes from left to right instead of right to left.
BThe code will cause an infinite loop due to missing increment in the for loop.
CThe code will throw a NullReferenceException at stack.Peek().
DThe code will compile but return an array of all -1 values.
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Consider the direction of traversal needed for the stack approach to work correctly.
❓ Predict Output
advanced
2:30remaining
Next Greater Element output for circular array
What is the output of the following code that finds the next greater element in a circular array?
DSA C#
using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;

class Program {
    static void Main() {
        int[] arr = {1, 2, 1};
        int[] result = NextGreaterElementCircular(arr);
        foreach (int val in result) {
            Console.Write(val + " ");
        }
    }

    static int[] NextGreaterElementCircular(int[] nums) {
        int n = nums.Length;
        int[] res = new int[n];
        Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>();

        for (int i = 2 * n - 1; i >= 0; i--) {
            while (stack.Count > 0 && stack.Peek() <= nums[i % n]) {
                stack.Pop();
            }
            res[i % n] = stack.Count == 0 ? -1 : stack.Peek();
            stack.Push(nums[i % n]);
        }
        return res;
    }
}
A2 -1 -1
B2 2 -1
C-1 2 -1
D2 -1 2
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Remember the array is circular, so after the last element, it wraps around to the first.
🚀 Application
expert
1:30remaining
Number of elements with no next greater element
Given the array [13, 7, 6, 12], how many elements have no next greater element to their right?
A3
B1
C2
D0
Attempts:
2 left
💡 Hint
Find the next greater element for each item and count how many are -1.

Practice

(1/5)
1. What does the Next Greater Element problem using a stack find for each element in an array?
easy
A. The first greater element to the right of each element
B. The first smaller element to the left of each element
C. The sum of all elements greater than the current element
D. The index of the maximum element in the array

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand the problem goal

    The Next Greater Element problem asks to find, for each element, the first element to its right that is greater than it.
  2. Step 2: Identify the role of the stack

    A stack helps track elements for which we haven't found a greater element yet, allowing efficient lookup of the next greater element.
  3. Final Answer:

    The first greater element to the right of each element -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Next Greater Element = first greater right element [OK]
Hint: Next Greater Element means first bigger number on right [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Confusing next greater with next smaller element
  • Thinking it finds the maximum element overall
  • Assuming it finds elements to the left instead of right
2. Which of the following C# code snippets correctly initializes a stack to solve the Next Greater Element problem?
easy
A. int[] stack = new int[10];
B. Stack stack = new Stack();
C. List<int> stack = new List<int>();
D. Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>();

Solution

  1. Step 1: Identify correct stack initialization syntax in C#

    Using generic Stack<int> with new Stack<int>() is the modern and type-safe way to create a stack of integers.
  2. Step 2: Compare other options

    Stack stack = new Stack(); uses non-generic Stack (older style), C uses List which is not a stack, D uses array which is fixed size and not a stack.
  3. Final Answer:

    Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>(); -> Option D
  4. Quick Check:

    Generic Stack<int> initialization is correct [OK]
Hint: Use generic Stack<int> for integer stacks in C# [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using non-generic Stack without type safety
  • Using List instead of Stack for LIFO behavior
  • Using fixed-size arrays instead of dynamic stack
3. What is the output of the Next Greater Element algorithm for the input array [4, 5, 2, 25]?
medium
A. [5, 25, 25, -1]
B. [5, -1, 25, -1]
C. [25, 25, 25, -1]
D. [-1, -1, -1, -1]

Solution

  1. Step 1: Process each element to find next greater

    For 4, next greater is 5; for 5, next greater is 25; for 2, next greater is 25; for 25, no greater element, so -1.
  2. Step 2: Form the output array

    Output array is [5, 25, 25, -1].
  3. Final Answer:

    [5, 25, 25, -1] -> Option A
  4. Quick Check:

    Next Greater Elements = [5, 25, 25, -1] [OK]
Hint: Check each element's right side for first bigger number [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Assigning -1 too early for elements with greater elements later
  • Confusing next greater with next smaller
  • Misreading the input array order
4. Identify the error in the following C# code snippet for Next Greater Element:
int[] arr = {2, 7, 3, 5, 4, 6, 8};
Stack<int> stack = new Stack<int>();
int[] result = new int[arr.Length];
for (int i = 0; i < arr.Length; i++) {
  while (stack.Count > 0 && arr[stack.Peek()] < arr[i]) {
    result[stack.Pop()] = arr[i];
  }
  stack.Push(i);
}
while (stack.Count > 0) {
  result[stack.Pop()] = 0;
}
medium
A. Using arr[i] instead of arr[stack.Peek()] in while condition
B. Assigning 0 instead of -1 for elements with no greater element
C. Pushing values instead of indices onto the stack
D. Not initializing the result array

Solution

  1. Step 1: Check how no greater elements are marked

    The code assigns 0 to elements with no next greater element, but conventionally -1 is used to indicate none.
  2. Step 2: Verify other parts of the code

    Indices are pushed, arr[stack.Peek()] is correctly used, and result array is initialized, so no errors there.
  3. Final Answer:

    Assigning 0 instead of -1 for elements with no greater element -> Option B
  4. Quick Check:

    No greater element marked as -1, not 0 [OK]
Hint: Use -1 to mark no next greater element, not 0 [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Using 0 instead of -1 for no greater element
  • Pushing values instead of indices on stack
  • Incorrect while loop condition
5. Given the array [13, 7, 6, 12], how would you modify the Next Greater Element algorithm to find the next greater element to the left instead of the right?
hard
A. Traverse the array from right to left and use a stack to track elements, popping greater ones.
B. Traverse the array from right to left and use a stack to track elements, popping smaller ones.
C. Traverse the array from left to right and use a stack to track elements, popping smaller ones.
D. Traverse the array from left to right and use a queue instead of a stack.

Solution

  1. Step 1: Understand direction change for next greater to left

    To find next greater element on the left, we must scan from left to right, checking elements before current.
  2. Step 2: Use stack to track candidates and pop smaller elements

    We push elements and pop smaller ones to find the nearest greater on the left efficiently.
  3. Final Answer:

    Traverse the array from left to right and use a stack to track elements, popping smaller ones. -> Option C
  4. Quick Check:

    Next greater left = left to right traversal with stack [OK]
Hint: For next greater left, scan left to right popping smaller elements [OK]
Common Mistakes:
  • Scanning right to left for next greater left
  • Using queue instead of stack
  • Popping greater elements instead of smaller
Recommended

Ready to prove it?

Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

10 questions~5 mineasy hard