Bird
Raised Fist0
DSA C++programming~5 mins

Tabulation Bottom Up DP in DSA C++ - Cheat Sheet & Quick Revision

Choose your learning style10 modes available
Recall & Review
beginner
What is Tabulation in Dynamic Programming?
Tabulation is a bottom-up approach in dynamic programming where we solve smaller subproblems first and store their results in a table (usually an array) to build up solutions to bigger problems.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
How does Tabulation differ from Memoization?
Tabulation solves problems iteratively from the smallest subproblem up, filling a table. Memoization solves problems top-down using recursion and stores results to avoid repeated work.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
Why is Tabulation often preferred over Memoization?
Tabulation avoids recursion overhead, uses iteration, and often has better space and time efficiency because it fills the table in a controlled order without stack calls.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
In Tabulation, what does the table usually represent?
The table stores the results of subproblems, where each entry corresponds to a solution for a smaller input or state, allowing reuse to build the final answer.
Click to reveal answer
beginner
Give a simple example problem solved by Tabulation.
The Fibonacci sequence can be solved by Tabulation by filling an array from the base cases (fib(0)=0, fib(1)=1) up to fib(n), each entry as sum of two previous entries.
Click to reveal answer
What is the main idea behind Tabulation in DP?
ASolve smaller problems first and build up
BUse recursion and store results
CRandomly guess answers
DDivide problem into unrelated parts
Which approach uses iteration instead of recursion?
ABrute force
BMemoization
CBacktracking
DTabulation
In Tabulation, what do we store in the table?
ARandom values
BFunction pointers
CResults of subproblems
DInput values
Which is a benefit of Tabulation over Memoization?
AAvoids recursion overhead
BUses recursion stack
CSlower execution
DMore memory usage
What is the base case in Tabulation for Fibonacci numbers?
Afib(0)=1, fib(1)=1
Bfib(0)=0, fib(1)=1
Cfib(0)=1, fib(1)=0
Dfib(0)=0, fib(1)=0
Explain how Tabulation solves a problem using bottom-up dynamic programming.
Think about filling a table from the base cases upwards.
You got /4 concepts.
    Describe the difference between Memoization and Tabulation in dynamic programming.
    Focus on the direction and method of solving subproblems.
    You got /4 concepts.

      Practice

      (1/5)
      1. What is the main idea behind Tabulation Bottom Up DP in dynamic programming?
      easy
      A. Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem
      B. Solve the problem by recursion without storing results
      C. Use random guesses to find the solution
      D. Start solving from the largest problem and break it down

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand bottom-up approach

        Tabulation means filling a table starting from the smallest subproblems, so we solve all smaller parts first.
      2. Step 2: Compare with other methods

        Unlike recursion without memory, bottom-up avoids repeated work by storing results in a table.
      3. Final Answer:

        Build a table from the smallest subproblems up to the main problem -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Bottom-up DP = Build table from small to big [OK]
      Hint: Think: solve small parts first, then bigger ones [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Confusing bottom-up with recursion without memoization
      • Thinking it starts from the largest problem
      • Ignoring the use of a table to store results
      2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a DP table for Fibonacci numbers using tabulation in C++?
      easy
      A. int dp[]; dp[1] = 1;
      B. int dp[100] = {0}; dp[1] = 1;
      C. int dp[100]; dp[0] = 1;
      D. int dp[100] = {1}; dp[2] = 1;

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Check array initialization

        int dp[100] = {0}; dp[1] = 1; initializes dp with zeros and sets dp[1] = 1, which is correct for Fibonacci base cases.
      2. Step 2: Identify errors in other options

        int dp[]; dp[1] = 1; has no size for dp array, invalid in C++. int dp[100]; dp[0] = 1; sets dp[0] = 1 which is incorrect base case. int dp[100] = {1}; dp[2] = 1; initializes dp with 1 at dp[0], which is wrong.
      3. Final Answer:

        int dp[100] = {0}; dp[1] = 1; -> Option B
      4. Quick Check:

        Correct base initialization = int dp[100] = {0}; dp[1] = 1; [OK]
      Hint: Initialize dp array with zeros and set base cases explicitly [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Not specifying array size
      • Wrong base case initialization
      • Assuming default values without initialization
      3. What will be the output of the following C++ code using bottom-up DP to find the 5th Fibonacci number?
      int fib(int n) {
        int dp[6] = {0};
        dp[1] = 1;
        for (int i = 2; i <= n; i++) {
          dp[i] = dp[i-1] + dp[i-2];
        }
        return dp[n];
      }
      
      int main() {
        std::cout << fib(5);
        return 0;
      }
      medium
      A. 5
      B. 8
      C. 3
      D. 13

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Trace dp array filling

        dp[0]=0, dp[1]=1; then dp[2]=1, dp[3]=2, dp[4]=3, dp[5]=5 by adding previous two.
      2. Step 2: Return dp[5]

        dp[5] is 5, so output is 5.
      3. Final Answer:

        5 -> Option A
      4. Quick Check:

        Fibonacci(5) = 5 [OK]
      Hint: Remember Fibonacci sequence: 0,1,1,2,3,5... [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Off-by-one errors in indexing
      • Confusing dp[0] and dp[1] values
      • Returning wrong dp index
      4. Identify the error in this bottom-up DP code for computing factorial of n:
      int factorial(int n) {
        int dp[100];
        dp[0] = 1;
        for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
          dp[i] = dp[i-1] * i;
        }
        return dp[n];
      }
      medium
      A. dp array not initialized to zero
      B. Loop should start from i = 0
      C. dp array size might be too small for large n
      D. No error, code is correct

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Check dp array size

        dp array size is fixed at 100, so if n > 99, dp[i] access is out of bounds causing error.
      2. Step 2: Analyze other parts

        Initialization and loop logic are correct; loop starts at 1 and dp[0] = 1 is base case.
      3. Final Answer:

        dp array size might be too small for large n -> Option C
      4. Quick Check:

        Array size must fit n [OK]
      Hint: Ensure dp array size >= n to avoid overflow [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Assuming dp size is always enough
      • Starting loop at wrong index
      • Ignoring base case initialization
      5. Given the problem to find the minimum number of coins to make amount 11 using coins {1, 3, 5}, which bottom-up DP table entry dp[11] will hold after running this code?
      int coins[] = {1, 3, 5};
      int n = 11;
      int dp[12];
      dp[0] = 0;
      for (int i = 1; i <= n; i++) {
        dp[i] = 1000; // large number
        for (int c : coins) {
          if (i - c >= 0) {
            dp[i] = std::min(dp[i], dp[i-c] + 1);
          }
        }
      }
      std::cout << dp[n];
      hard
      A. 6
      B. 5
      C. 4
      D. 3

      Solution

      1. Step 1: Understand DP logic for coin change

        dp[i] stores minimum coins for amount i. For 11, check coins 1,3,5 and pick minimum.
      2. Step 2: Calculate dp values up to 11

        dp[0]=0; dp[1]=1; dp[2]=2; dp[3]=1; dp[4]=2; dp[5]=1; dp[6]=2; dp[7]=3; dp[8]=2; dp[9]=3; dp[10]=2; dp[11]=3 (e.g., 5+5+1 or 3+3+5)
      3. Final Answer:

        3 -> Option D
      4. Quick Check:

        Minimum coins for 11 = 3 [OK]
      Hint: Build dp from 0 to n, pick min coins at each step [OK]
      Common Mistakes:
      • Not initializing dp[0] = 0
      • Using max int instead of large number
      • Forgetting to check i - coin >= 0
      Recommended

      Ready to prove it?

      Pass the test and this pattern moves unknown strong while earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.

      10 questions~5 mineasy hard