Merge Sort as Divide and Conquer in DSA C++ - Practice Problems & Challenges

Challenge - 5 Problems

❓ Predict Output

intermediate

Output of Merge Sort on a small array

What is the output of the following C++ code after performing merge sort on the array?

DSA C++

void merge(int arr[], int l, int m, int r) {
    int n1 = m - l + 1;
    int n2 = r - m;
    int L[n1], R[n2];
    for (int i = 0; i < n1; i++)
        L[i] = arr[l + i];
    for (int j = 0; j < n2; j++)
        R[j] = arr[m + 1 + j];
    int i = 0, j = 0, k = l;
    while (i < n1 && j < n2) {
        if (L[i] <= R[j]) {
            arr[k] = L[i];
            i++;
        } else {
            arr[k] = R[j];
            j++;
        }
        k++;
    }
    while (i < n1) {
        arr[k] = L[i];
        i++;
        k++;
    }
    while (j < n2) {
        arr[k] = R[j];
        j++;
        k++;
    }
}

void mergeSort(int arr[], int l, int r) {
    if (l < r) {
        int m = l + (r - l) / 2;
        mergeSort(arr, l, m);
        mergeSort(arr, m + 1, r);
        merge(arr, l, m, r);
    }
}

int main() {
    int arr[] = {5, 2, 9, 1, 5};
    int n = 5;
    mergeSort(arr, 0, n - 1);
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
        std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
    }
    return 0;
}

A 1 2 5 5 9

B 1 5 2 5 9

C 9 5 5 2 1

D 5 2 9 1 5

💡 Hint

Remember that merge sort sorts the array in ascending order by dividing and merging.

Merge sort divides the array into halves recursively and merges them in sorted order. The final sorted array is 1 2 5 5 9.

🧠 Conceptual

intermediate

Understanding the Divide Step in Merge Sort

In merge sort, what is the main purpose of the divide step?

A To swap elements to sort the array in place

B To split the array into two halves until each subarray has one element

C To merge two sorted arrays into one sorted array

D To find the maximum element in the array

💡 Hint

Think about how merge sort breaks down the problem before sorting.

The divide step breaks the array into smaller parts until each part has only one element, which is trivially sorted.

🔧 Debug

advanced

Identify the bug in the merge function

What error will occur when running this merge function on an array if the mergeSort calls are correct?

DSA C++

void merge(int arr[], int l, int m, int r) {
    int n1 = m - l + 1;
    int n2 = r - m;
    int L[n1], R[n2];
    for (int i = 0; i < n1; i++)
        L[i] = arr[l + i];
    for (int j = 0; j < n2; j++)
        R[j] = arr[m + 1 + j];
    int i = 0, j = 0, k = l;
    while (i < n1 && j < n2) {
        if (L[i] <= R[j]) {
            arr[k] = L[i];
            i++;
        } else {
            arr[k] = R[j];
            j++;
        }
        k++;
    }
    while (i < n1) {
        arr[k] = L[i];
        i++;
        k++;
    }
    while (j < n2) {
        arr[k] = R[j];
        j++;
        k++;
    }
}

A Array index out of bounds error due to incorrect loop condition in copying L array

B No error, the function works correctly

C Infinite loop in the while merging step

D Segmentation fault due to uninitialized pointers

💡 Hint

Check the loop conditions when copying elements to temporary arrays.

The loop copying elements to L uses i <= n1 which goes out of bounds since valid indices are 0 to n1-1.

❓ Predict Output

advanced

Output after partial merge sort calls

Given the array {8, 3, 7, 4} and the following calls, what is the state of the array after these calls?

DSA C++

int arr[] = {8, 3, 7, 4};
mergeSort(arr, 0, 1);
mergeSort(arr, 2, 3);

A 3 8 7 4

B 8 3 4 7

C 3 8 4 7

D 4 7 8 3

💡 Hint

Each mergeSort call sorts only the specified subarray.

The first call sorts indices 0 and 1: {8,3} → {3,8}. The second call sorts indices 2 and 3: {7,4} → {4,7}. The array becomes {3,8,4,7}.

🧠 Conceptual

expert

Time Complexity of Merge Sort

What is the time complexity of merge sort and why?

A O(n) because it sorts the array in a single pass

B O(n^2) because each element is compared with every other element

C O(log n) because it only divides the array without merging

D O(n log n) because the array is divided into halves log n times and merging takes O(n) each time

💡 Hint

Think about how many times the array is split and how much work merging takes.

Merge sort divides the array into halves log n times and merging each level takes O(n), so total is O(n log n).

Practice

1. What is the main idea behind the Merge Sort algorithm?

easy

A. Select a pivot and partition the array around it

B. Sort the array by repeatedly swapping adjacent elements

C. Divide the array into halves, sort each half, then merge them

D. Insert elements one by one into a sorted list

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand the divide and conquer approach

   Merge Sort splits the array into two halves recursively until single elements remain.

2. Step 2: Merge sorted halves

   After splitting, it merges the halves back in sorted order to form the sorted array.

3. Final Answer:

   Divide the array into halves, sort each half, then merge them -> Option C

4. Quick Check:

   Merge Sort = Divide, sort halves, merge [OK]

Hint: Remember: split, sort halves, then merge [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing Merge Sort with Bubble Sort
• Thinking Merge Sort uses a pivot like Quick Sort
• Believing Merge Sort sorts in place without merging

2. Which of the following is the correct base case condition in a typical Merge Sort implementation in C++?

easy

A. if (start > end) return;

B. if (start < end) return;

C. if (start == end + 1) return;

D. if (start >= end) return;

Solution

1. Step 1: Identify when to stop recursion

   The base case is when the subarray has one or zero elements, meaning start index is greater or equal to end index.

2. Step 2: Match condition to code

   The condition if (start >= end) return; correctly stops recursion when the subarray cannot be divided further.

3. Final Answer:

   if (start >= end) return; -> Option D

4. Quick Check:

   Base case = start >= end [OK]

Hint: Stop recursion when start is not less than end [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using start > end misses single element subarray
• Using start == end + 1 is incorrect indexing
• Using start < end returns too early

3. What will be the output of the following C++ code snippet using Merge Sort on array {4, 1, 3, 2}?

void merge(int arr[], int l, int m, int r) {
    int n1 = m - l + 1, n2 = r - m;
    int L[n1], R[n2];
    for (int i = 0; i < n1; i++) L[i] = arr[l + i];
    for (int j = 0; j < n2; j++) R[j] = arr[m + 1 + j];
    int i = 0, j = 0, k = l;
    while (i < n1 && j < n2) {
        if (L[i] <= R[j]) arr[k++] = L[i++];
        else arr[k++] = R[j++];
    }
    while (i < n1) arr[k++] = L[i++];
    while (j < n2) arr[k++] = R[j++];
}

void mergeSort(int arr[], int l, int r) {
    if (l >= r) return;
    int m = l + (r - l) / 2;
    mergeSort(arr, l, m);
    mergeSort(arr, m + 1, r);
    merge(arr, l, m, r);
}

int main() {
    int arr[] = {4, 1, 3, 2};
    int n = 4;
    mergeSort(arr, 0, n - 1);
    for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) std::cout << arr[i] << " ";
    return 0;
}

medium

A. 1 2 3 4

B. 4 3 2 1

C. 1 3 2 4

D. 2 1 3 4

Solution

1. Step 1: Trace recursive splitting and merging

   The array splits into [4,1] and [3,2], then further into single elements. Each pair is merged sorted: [1,4] and [2,3].

2. Step 2: Final merge

   Merging [1,4] and [2,3] results in [1,2,3,4]. The output prints this sorted array.

3. Final Answer:

   1 2 3 4 -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Sorted array = 1 2 3 4 [OK]

Hint: Merge Sort always outputs sorted array [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Confusing merge order causing wrong output
• Forgetting to merge after recursive calls
• Printing array before sorting completes

4. Identify the bug in this Merge Sort merge function snippet:

void merge(int arr[], int l, int m, int r) {
    int n1 = m - l + 1, n2 = r - m;
    int L[n1], R[n2];
    for (int i = 0; i <= n1; i++) L[i] = arr[l + i];
    for (int j = 0; j < n2; j++) R[j] = arr[m + 1 + j];
    int i = 0, j = 0, k = l;
    while (i < n1 && j < n2) {
        if (L[i] <= R[j]) arr[k++] = L[i++];
        else arr[k++] = R[j++];
    }
    while (i < n1) arr[k++] = L[i++];
    while (j < n2) arr[k++] = R[j++];
}

medium

A. The loop 'for (int i = 0; i <= n1; i++)' causes out-of-bounds access

B. The merge condition should be 'L[i] < R[j]' instead of '<='

C. The arrays L and R should be dynamically allocated

D. The indices i and j should start from 1, not 0

Solution

1. Step 1: Check loop bounds for copying left array

   The loop uses 'i <= n1', which runs one extra iteration causing out-of-bounds access since valid indices are 0 to n1-1.

2. Step 2: Correct loop condition

   The loop should be 'i < n1' to copy exactly n1 elements without overflow.

3. Final Answer:

   The loop 'for (int i = 0; i <= n1; i++)' causes out-of-bounds access -> Option A

4. Quick Check:

   Loop bounds must be less than array size [OK]

Hint: Check array loops use < not <= for indexing [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Using <= instead of < in loops
• Starting indices at 1 instead of 0
• Ignoring dynamic allocation but it's not mandatory here

5. Given an array {5, 3, 8, 6, 2, 7, 4, 1}, how many total merge operations will be performed during a full Merge Sort?

hard

A. 15

B. 7

C. 8

D. 4

Solution

1. Step 1: Understand merge operations in Merge Sort

   Merge Sort splits the array until single elements, then merges pairs stepwise. For n=8 elements, merges happen at each level combining subarrays.

2. Step 2: Calculate total merges

   Number of merges = n - 1 = 8 - 1 = 7 merges in total to combine all elements into one sorted array.

3. Final Answer:

   7 -> Option B

4. Quick Check:

   Total merges = n - 1 = 7 [OK]

Hint: Total merges in Merge Sort = array size minus one [OK]

Common Mistakes:

• Counting merges as number of elements
• Confusing merges with recursive calls
• Assuming merges double at each level