What is the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) in an array?
The Longest Increasing Subsequence is the longest sequence of elements in the array such that each element is strictly greater than the previous one, and the elements are in the same order as in the original array but not necessarily contiguous.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What is the time complexity of the classic dynamic programming approach to find LIS?
The classic dynamic programming approach to find LIS has a time complexity of O(n²), where n is the number of elements in the array.
Click to reveal answer
advanced
What data structure helps optimize LIS calculation to O(n log n)?
A binary search technique on a temporary array (often called 'tails') helps optimize LIS calculation to O(n log n) by maintaining the smallest possible tail element for increasing subsequences of different lengths.
Click to reveal answer
advanced
In LIS, why do we use binary search on the 'tails' array?
We use binary search on the 'tails' array to quickly find the position where the current element can replace an existing tail element or extend the sequence, ensuring the tails array remains sorted and minimal for subsequence lengths.
Click to reveal answer
intermediate
What does the 'tails' array represent in the O(n log n) LIS algorithm?
The 'tails' array stores the smallest possible last element of an increasing subsequence of a given length. For example, tails[i] is the smallest tail of all increasing subsequences of length i+1 found so far.
Click to reveal answer
What is the output length of LIS for the array [10, 9, 2, 5, 3, 7, 101, 18]?
A6
B4
C5
D3
✗ Incorrect
The longest increasing subsequence is [2, 3, 7, 101], which has length 4.
Which approach has better time complexity for LIS: classic DP or binary search optimization?
AClassic DP with O(n²)
BNeither can solve LIS
CBoth have same complexity
DBinary search optimization with O(n log n)
✗ Incorrect
Binary search optimization reduces the time complexity to O(n log n), which is better than the classic DP approach of O(n²).
In the O(n log n) LIS algorithm, what does replacing an element in the 'tails' array signify?
AImproving the potential for longer subsequences
BStarting a new subsequence
CExtending the LIS length
DNo effect on LIS
✗ Incorrect
Replacing an element in 'tails' means we found a smaller tail for a subsequence of that length, improving chances to build longer subsequences later.
Which of these sequences is NOT strictly increasing?
A[10, 20, 30]
B[1, 3, 5, 7]
C[2, 2, 3, 4]
D[5, 6, 8, 9]
✗ Incorrect
Sequence [2, 2, 3, 4] is not strictly increasing because 2 is repeated consecutively.
What is the minimum length of LIS in any non-empty array?
A1
B2
C0
DDepends on array size
✗ Incorrect
The minimum length of LIS is 1 because any single element is an increasing subsequence by itself.
Explain the difference between the classic dynamic programming approach and the binary search optimized approach for finding the Longest Increasing Subsequence.
Think about how the 'tails' array helps reduce comparisons.
You got /5 concepts.
Describe how the 'tails' array is updated during the O(n log n) LIS algorithm when processing each element.
Focus on how binary search helps maintain the tails array.
You got /5 concepts.
Practice
(1/5)
1. What does the Longest Increasing Subsequence (LIS) problem ask for in a given sequence of numbers?
easy
A. The longest subsequence where numbers are equal
B. The longest subsequence where each number is larger than the previous one
C. The longest subsequence where each number is smaller than the previous one
D. The shortest subsequence with increasing numbers
Solution
Step 1: Understand the problem definition
The LIS problem looks for a subsequence where every next number is bigger than the one before it.
Step 2: Compare options with the definition
The longest subsequence where each number is larger than the previous one matches the definition exactly, others describe different or incorrect sequences.
Final Answer:
The longest subsequence where each number is larger than the previous one -> Option B
Quick Check:
LIS means increasing subsequence = The longest subsequence where each number is larger than the previous one [OK]
Hint: LIS means strictly increasing numbers in order [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Confusing increasing with decreasing subsequence
Thinking LIS means contiguous subarray
Assuming equal numbers count as increasing
2. Which of the following is the correct way to declare a vector for storing LIS lengths in C++?
easy
A. std::vector<int> lis(n, 1);
B. vector<int> lis(n);
C. std::vector lis(n, 0);
D. vector lis<int>(n, 1);
Solution
Step 1: Check correct vector declaration syntax
In C++, std::vector<int> lis(n, 1); creates a vector of size n with all values initialized to 1.
Step 2: Validate each option
std::vector<int> lis(n, 1); uses correct syntax and initialization. vector<int> lis(n); misses initialization, C misses template argument, D has wrong template syntax.
Final Answer:
std::vector<int> lis(n, 1); -> Option A
Quick Check:
Correct vector syntax with initialization = std::vector<int> lis(n, 1); [OK]
Hint: Use std::vector<int> name(size, initial_value) [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Omitting std:: or using wrong template syntax
Not initializing vector values
Using wrong brackets or missing template argument
3. What is the output of the following C++ code snippet?
std::vector<int> arr = {10, 22, 9, 33, 21, 50, 41, 60};
int n = arr.size();
std::vector<int> lis(n, 1);
for (int i = 1; i < n; i++) {
for (int j = 0; j < i; j++) {
if (arr[i] > arr[j] && lis[i] < lis[j] + 1) {
lis[i] = lis[j] + 1;
}
}
}
int max_lis = 0;
for (int i = 0; i < n; i++) {
if (lis[i] > max_lis) max_lis = lis[i];
}
std::cout << max_lis << std::endl;
The code updates lis[i] without checking if lis[j] + 1 is greater, causing wrong LIS values.
Step 2: Identify missing condition
Adding 'if (lis[i] < lis[j] + 1)' before update fixes the bug.
Final Answer:
Missing check if lis[i] < lis[j] + 1 before updating -> Option A
Quick Check:
Update only if new LIS is longer [OK]
Hint: Always check if new LIS length is greater before update [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Updating lis[i] blindly overwrites correct values
Confusing loop indices
Incorrect use of max_element function
5. Given the sequence {5, 7, 4, 8, 6, 9}, what is the length of the Longest Increasing Subsequence if you must also ensure the subsequence elements are at even indices only (0-based)?
medium
A. 4
B. 3
C. 2
D. 1
Solution
Step 1: Identify even indices (0-based)
Positions 0, 2, 4 have values 5, 4, 6.
Step 2: Compute LIS on {5, 4, 6}
Possible increasing subsequences: {5, 6} or {4, 6}, both length 2. No length 3 possible (5 > 4).
Final Answer:
2 -> Option C
Quick Check:
LIS length on even indices only = 2 [OK]
Hint: Filter even indices first, then find LIS [OK]
Common Mistakes:
Ignoring index restriction
Using full sequence instead of filtered
Assuming contiguous subsequence
Recommended
Ready to prove it?
Pass the test and this pattern moves unknownstrongwhile earning +1 Grip toward your certificate.